Illocutions, implicata, and what a conversation requires

Pragmatics and Cognition

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 65-91

  Green, Mitchell S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989403375     PISSN: 09290907     EISSN: 15699943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/pc.7.1.05gre     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Attardo, S. 1997. “Competition and cooperation: Beyond Gricean pragmatics”. Pragmatics & Cognition 5: 19-49.
2. Bach, K. 1994. “Conversational impliciture”. Mind and Language 9: 124-162.
3. Barwise, J. 1989. The Situation in Logic. Palo Alto, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
4. Bell, M. 1975. “Questioning”. The Philosophical Quarterly 25: 193-212.
5. Berg, J. 1991. “The relevant relevance”. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 411-425.
6. Brandom, R. 1983. “Asserting”. Nous 17: 637-650.
7. Brandom, R. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Carston, R. 1988. “Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics”. In R. Kempson (ed) Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155-181.
9. Clark, H. H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Clark, H.H. and Schaefer, F. 1989. “Contributing to discourse”. Cognitive Science 13: 259-294.
11. Dascal, M. 1979. “Conversational relevance”. In A. Margalit (ed), Meaning and Use. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 153-174.
12. Dascal, M. 1992. “On the pragmatic structure of conversation”. In H. Parret and J. Verschueren (eds), (On) Searle on Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 35-56.
13. Fogelin, R. 1967. Evidence and Meaning. New York: Humanities Press.
14. Green, M. S. 1995. “Quantity, volubility, and some varieties of discourse”. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 83-112.
15. Green, M. S. 1997. “On the autonomy of linguistic meaning”. Mind 106: 217-244.
16. Green, M.S. 1998. “Direct reference and implicature”. Philosophical Studies 91: 61-90.
17. Green, M. S. Ms. “The status of supposition”.
18. Green, M. S. and Hitchcock, C. 1994. “Reflections on reflection: van Fraassen on belief’. Synthese 98: 297-324.
19. Grice, H. P. 1967, “Logic and Conversation”, repr. in Grice (1989).
20. Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Hamblin, C.L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.
22. Hamblin, C.L. 1971. “Mathematical models of dialogue”. Theoria 27: 130-55.
23. Hamish, R. 1976. “Logical form and implicature”. In T. Bever, J. Katz and D. Langendoen (eds), An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability. New York: Crowell, 313-391.
24. Hirschberg, J. 1985. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Pennsylvania.
25. Holdcroft, D. 1987. “Conversational relevance”. In J. Verschueren and M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds), The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected Papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 477-495.
26. Horn, L. 1984. “Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature”. In D. Schiffrin (ed), Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, Georgetown: Georgetown Univeristy Press, 11-42.
27. Horn, L. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Kaplan, D. 1989. “Demonstratives”. In J. Almog et al. (eds), Themes from David Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 481-614.
29. Kasher, A. 1980. “Three kinds of linguistic commitment”. In C. Rohrer (ed), Time, Tense and Quantifiers. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 207-223.
30. Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Levinson, S. 1992. “Activity types and language use”. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66-100.
32. Lewis, D. 1979. “Scorekeeping in a language game”. In D. Lewis, Philosophical Papers, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 233-249.
33. Mackenzie, J. 1985. “No logic before Friday”. Synthese 63: 329-331.
34. Manor, R. 1981. “Dialogues and the logics of questions and answers”. Linguistische Berichte 73: 1-28.
35. Pelczar, M., and Rainsbury, J. 1998. “The indexical character of names”. Synthese. 114: 243-317
36. Pendlebury, M. 1986. “Against the power of force: Remarks on the meaning of mood”. Mind 95: 361-372.
37. Richard, M. 1990. Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Schober, M. and Clark, H.H. 1989. “Understanding by addressees and overhearers”. Cognitive Psychology 21: 211-232.
39. Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Searle, J. 1992. “Conversation”. In H. Parret and J. Verschueren (eds), (On) Searle on Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 7-30.
41. Searle, J. and Vanderveken, D. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Stalnaker, R. 1973. “Presuppositions”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447-457.
43. Stalnaker, R. 1974. “Pragmatic presuppositions”. In M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds), Semantics and Philosophy. New York: NYU Press, 197-213.
44. Thomason, R. 1990. “Accommodation, meaning and implicature: Interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics”. In Cohen et al. (eds), 325-364.
45. Walton, D. 1985. “New directions in the logic of dialogue”. Synthese 63: 259-274.
46. Walton, D. and Krabbe, E. 1995. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.