Simultaneous interpreting across modalities

Interpreting

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 169-185

  Padden, Carol A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989403363     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.5.2.07pad     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aronoff, M., Meir I., Padden, C., & Sandler, W. (2002). Classifier complexes and morphology in two sign languages. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifiers in sign language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Baker-Shenk, C. (1992). The interpreter: Machine, advocate or ally? In J. Plant-Moeller (Ed.), Expanding horizons: Proceedings of the 12th National Convention of the Registry of Interpreters for theDeaf, August 1991 (pp. 120-140). Silver Spring, MD: RID Publications.
3. Berman, R., & Slobin, D. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Brentari, D. (1998). A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
5. Brentari, D., & Padden, C. (2001). Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation (pp.49-85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Emmorey, K. (2002). Perspectives on classifer constructions in sign language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Hawk, S. (2001). To build a scene: The order in which concepts appear in American Sign Language classifier constructions: Paper presented at the 27th Annual Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley.
8. Hoiting, N., & Slobin, D. I. (1993). Reference to movement in speech and sign. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language, Trieste, Italy.
9. Hoiting, N., & Slobin, D.I. (2001). Typological and modality constraints on borrowing: Examples from the Sign Language of the Netherlands (pp. 121-137). In D. Brentari (Ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum & Associates.
10. Isham, W. (1994). Memory for sentence form after simultaneous interpretation: Evidence both for and against deverbalization. In B. Moser-Mercer (Ed.), Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation (pp. 191-211). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
11. Isham, W. (1995). On the relevance of signed languages to research in interpretation. Target, 7(1), 135-149.
12. Isham, W., & Lane, H. (1993). Simultaneous interpretation and the recall of source-language sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(3), 241-264.
13. Kegl, J., Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (1999). Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development (pp. 179-237). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Klima, E., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
15. Liddell, S. (1984). THINK and BELIEVE: Sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language, 60, 372-399.
16. Liddell, S.K. (2000). Indicating verbs and pronouns: Pointing away from agreement. In H. Lane (Ed.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima. (pp. 303-320). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
17. Meir I. & Sandler, W. (in press). Language in space: A window into Israeli sign language. Haifa: The University of Haifa Press.
18. Padden, C. (1988). Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Press.
19. Sandler, W. (1989). Phonological representation of the sign. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris Publications.
20. Senghas, A. (1995). Children’s Contribution to the Birth of Nicaraguan Sign Language. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
21. Slobin, D.I. (1996a). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In S.C. Levinson (Ed.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, (pp. 70-96). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22. Slobin, D.I. (1996b). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195-220). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Slobin, D.I. (1997). Mind, code and text. In S. Thompson (Ed.), Essays on language function and language type. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
24. Smith, W. (1990). Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language. In P. Siple (Ed.), Theoretical issues in sign language research (pp.21128) (Vol. 1: Linguistics). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25. Supalla, T., & Webb, R. (1995). The grammar of International Sign: A new look at pidgin languages. In J. S. Reilly (Ed.), Language, gesture, and space. (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Wilbur, R. B. (1990). Why syllables: What the notion means for ASL research. In P. Siple (Ed.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, (pp.81-108). Vol. 1: Linguistics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
27. Wilbur, R. B., & Petersen, L. (1998). Modality interactions of speech and signing in simultaneous communication. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 41(1), 200-212.
28. Wilcox, S. (1992). The phonetics offingerspelling. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.