From matrix clause to pragmatic marker: The history of look-forms

Journal of Historical Pragmatics

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 177-199

  Brinton, Laurel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989397886     PISSN: 15665852     EISSN: 15699854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/jhp.2.2.02bri     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akimoto, Minoji. 2000. The grammaticalization of the verb pray. In: Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach, and Dieter Stein (eds.). Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 67-84.
2. American Dialect Society News Group. http://www.americandialect.org/adslarchive.shtml.
3. Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions (Topics in English Linguistics 19). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. British National Corpus, http://thetis.bl.uk.
5. Brown Corpus, (accessed through the Linguistic Data Consortium http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/).
6. Burchfield, Robert W. 1996. The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. The Canadian Oxford Dictionary. 1998. Katherine Barber (ed.). Toronto, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Dictionary of American Regional English, Vol, III. 1996. Frederic G. Cassidy and Joan Houstan Hall (eds.). Cambridge, MA and London: Belknap Press for Harvard University Press.
9. Erman, Britt, and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas. 1993. Pragmaticalization: The case of ba’ and you know. Studieri modern sprakvetenskap 10, 76-93.
10. Fraser, Bruce. 1988. Types of English discourse markers. ActaLinguisticaHungarica 38, 19-33.
11. Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Keller, Eric, and Sylvia Taba Warner. 1979, 1976. Gambits: Conversational Tools. 1, Openers. 2. Links. Hull, P. Q.: Public Service Commission of Canada, Language Training Branch, English Program Development Unit.
13. Kyto, Merja. 1993. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts. 2nd ed. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
14. Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 01). Revised and expanded version. Munich andNewcastle: Lincom Europa.
15. Lopez-Couso, María José. 1996. On the history of methinks: From impersonal construction to fossilized expression. Folia Linguistica Historica 17, 153-69.
16. Mathews, M.M. 1946. Notes on ‘American Speech,’ April 1945. American Speech 21, 19-22.
17. Middle English Dictionary. 1952-present. Hans Kurathet al. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18. Modern English Collection. University of Virginia Electronic Text Center. http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/modeng/modengO.browse.html.
19. Modern English Collection, University of Michigan. http://www.hti.umich/english/pdmodeng/index.html.
20. Neufeldt, Victoria. 1999. Re: lookit? Online posting. April 16 ADS-L@listserv.uga.edu.
21. Oizumi, Akio (ed.). 1991-1992. A Complete Concordance to the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer (Alpha-Omega, Reihe C, Englische Autoren). Kunihiro Miki (prog.). 10 vols. Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann.
22. Oxford English Dictionary. 1992.2nd ed. on Compact Disc. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Palander-Collin, Minna. 1999. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki LV). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
24. Pickles, John D., and John L. Dawson (eds.). 1987. A Concordance to John Gower’s Confessio Amantis. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
25. Safire, William. 1999. On language. New York Times Sunday Magazine. June 13, p. 18.
26. Schmidt, Alexander. 1971 (1902). Shakespeare Lexicon and Quotation Dictionary. 3rd ed. revised and enlarged by Gregor Sarrazin. New York: Dover (Rpt.).
27. Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Schwenter, Scott A., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2000. Invoking scalarity: The development of in fact. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1, 7-25.
29. Spevack, Martin. 1969. A Complete and Systematic Concordance to the Works of Shakespeare. 9 vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
30. Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1994. An Introduction to Spoken Interaction (Learning About Language). London and New York: Longman.
31. Tabor, Whitney, and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In: Anna Giacalone Ramat and Paul J. Hopper (eds.). The Limits of Grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 37). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 229-72.
32. Thompson, Sarah, and Anthony Mulac. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In: Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.). Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2 (Typological Studies in Language 19). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 313-29.
33. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. In press. Constructions in grammaticalization. In: Brian Joseph and Richard Janda (eds.). Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
34. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995a. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In: Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.). Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 31-54.
35. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995b. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization”. XIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, Aug.
36. Wright, Joseph. 1904. The English Dialect Dictionary. London: Henry Frowde forthe English Dialect Society and New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.