Habitus, Consciousness, Agency and the Problem of Intention How We Carry and are Carried by Political Discourses

Folia Linguistica

Volumn 35, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 97-130

  Scollon, Suzanne ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989372908     PISSN: 01654004     EISSN: 16147308     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/flin.2001.35.1-2.97     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aheame, Jeremy. 1995. Michel de Certeau: Interpretation and its Other Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
2. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities London: Verso.
3. Audi, Robert. 1993. Action, intention, and reason Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
4. Bakhtin, M.M. 1984 (Originally published in 1929). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (Caryl Emerson ed. and tr.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5. Bateson, Gregory. 1979. Mind and nature: a necessary unity New York: E.P. Dutton.
6. Bateson, Gregory and Mary Catherine Bateson. 1987. Angels Fear: Toward an Epistemology of the Sacred New York: Macmillan.
7. Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal nationalism London, Thousand Oaks, Delhi: Sage.
8. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1972. Esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique. Librairie Droz.
9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. “Vive la crise! for heterodoxy in social science Theory and Society 17 (5), 773-788.
11. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The logic of practice Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Practical reason: on the theory of action Stanford: Stanford University Press.
13. de Saint-Georges, Ingrid. In progress. Social actors' orientation towards the future: anticipatory discourse in a mediated discourse perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University Department of Linguistics.
14. Dunne, Michele Durocher. 2000. Democracy in contemporary Egyptian political discourse. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University Arabic Language, Literature, and Linguistics.
15. Eagleton, Terry. 1991. Ideology: an introduction London and New York: Verso.
16. Erickson, Frederick and Jeffrey Shultz. 1982. The Counselor as Gatekeeper: Social Interaction in Interviews New York: Academic Press.
17. Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language London and New York: Longman.
19. Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical discourse analysis” In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage, 258-284.
20. Gee, James Paul. 1999. An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method London and New York: Routledge.
21. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York:Doubleday.
22. Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and conversation” In: P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts (Syntax and semantics, volume 3). New York: Academic Press, 113-128.
23. Hanks, William F. 1987. “Discourse genres in a theory of practice” American Ethnologist 14:668-692.
24. Hymes, Dell. 1974. “Why linguistics needs the sociologist” In: Foundations in sociolinguistics; an ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 69-82.
25. Illich, Ivan. 1981. Shadow Work Boston and London: Marion Boyars.
26. Jones, Rodney Hale. 2001. Mediated action and sexual risk: Discourses of AIDS and sexuality in the People's Republic of China PhD Dissertation. Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University.
27. Lave, Jean. 1988. Cognition in practice Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Reddy, Michael J., 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language In: Andrew Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Cambride: Cambridge University Press.
30. Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and discrimination: rhetorics of racism and antisemitism London: Routledge.
31. Schiflrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to discourse Cambridge, Massachusetts and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
32. Scollon, Ron. 1998. Mediated discourse as social interaction: A study of news discourse New York: Longman.
33. Scollon, Ron. 2000. “Hidden dialogicality: when infelicity becomes fear of infringement” In: Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill and Frances Rock (eds.), Dialogue analysis VII: working with dialogue. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 425-443.
34. Scollon, Ron. 2001a. Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice London: Routledge.
35. Scollon, Ron. 2001b. “Action and text: Toward an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (interaction” In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
36. Scollon, Ron and Suzanne Wong Scollon. 1995 (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
37. Scollon, Suzanne. 1997. “Metaphors of self and communication” Multilingua, 16 (l):1-38.
38. Scollon, Suzanne. 1998. “Identity through the embodiment of authoritative gesture: The practice of taijiquan in Hong Kong” In: D Ray Heisey and Wenxiang Gong (eds.) Communication and culture: China and the world entering the 21st century. Amsterdam: Rodopi Editions. 181-204.
39. Scollon, Suzanne. 2002. “Threat or Business as Usual? A Multimodal, Intertextual Analysis of a Political Statement” In: Dedaic, Mirjana and Daniel Nelson, (eds.), At war with words. Mouton de Gruyter.
40. Scollon, Suzanne. In press. “Political and Somatic Alignment: Habitus, Ideology and Social Practice” In: Ruth Wodak and Gilbert Weiss (eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, Palgrave.
41. Scollon, Suzanne. In preparation. Anticipating crisis: habitus, agency, intention and changing nexus of practice
42. Scollon, Suzanne and Ron Scollon. 2000. The Construction of Agency and Action in Anticipatory Discourse: Positioning Ourselves Against Neo-liberalism. Paper presented at III Conference for Sociocultural Research, UNICAMP, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 16 to 20 July.
43. Scollon, Suzanne and Yuling Pan. In press. “Saa Taaigik: A metaphor for conflict management” In: David Li, ed, Discourses in search of members.
44. Searle, John. 1983. Intentionality: an essay in the philosophy of mind Cambridge University Press.
45. Segal, Jerome M. 1991. Agency and alienation: a theory of human presence Savage, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
46. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Tolstoy, L.N. 1978. War and Peace. Translated by Rosemary Edmonds. Penguin.
48. Tulviste, Peeter. 1994. “History taught at school versus history discovered at home: The case of Estonia” European Journal of Psychology of Education, IX (1):121-126.
49. Tulviste, Peeter and James V. Wertsch. 1994. “Official and unofficial histories: The case of Estonia” Journal of Narrative and Life History 4 (4): 311-329.
50. Watzlawick, P, Bevin, J. and Jackson, D. 1967. The pragmatics of human communication New York: Norton.
51. Wertsch, James V 1997. “Narrative tools of history and identity” Culture and Psychology 3 (1): 5-20.
52. Wile, Douglas. 1996. Lost t'ai-chi classics from the late Ch'ing dynasty Albany: State University of New York Press.
53. Wodak, Ruth. 1999. “Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century” Research on language and social interaction 32:1&2, 185-193.
54. Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl and Karin Liebhart. 1999. Tr Angelika Hirsch and Richard Mitten. The Discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh University Press.
55. Zhao, Suisheng, ed. 1999. Across the Taiwan Strait: Mainland China, Taiwan and the 19951996 Crisis. New York and London: Routledge