The functions of actually in a corpus of intercultural conversations

International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 257-280

  Cheng, Winnie ^a   Warren, Martin ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989368506     PISSN: 13846655     EISSN: 15699811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.6.2.04che     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aijmer, K. 1986. “Why is actually so popular in spoken English”. English in Speech and writing: A Symposium, G. Tottie, and I. Backlund (eds.), 119-129. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
2. Bolt, P. 1994. “The International Corpus of English project—the Hong Kong experience”. In U. Fries, G. Tottie, and P. Schneider (eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Zurich 1993, 15-24. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
3. Bolton, K. 1992. “Sociolinguistics today: Asia and the West”. In K. Bolton and H. Kwok (eds.), Sociolinguistics today: International perspectives, 5-66. London: Routledge.
4. Brown, P. and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cheng, W. and M. Warren. 1999. “Facilitating a description of intercultural conversations: the Hong Kong Corpus of Conversational English”. ICAME Journal 23: 5-20.
6. Crystal, D. and D. Davy. 1975. Advanced Conversational English. London: Longman.
7. Edmondson, W. and J. House. 1981. Let’s talk and talk about it. A pedagogical grammar of English. Munich: Urban and Schwarzenberg.
8. Fraser, B. 1990. “An approach to discourse markers”. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 383-395.
9. Goffman, E. 1955. “On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction”. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18: 213-231.
10. Hoey, M. 1998. “The hidden lexical clues of textual organisation: A preliminary investigation into an unusual text from a corpus perspective”. Teaching and Learning Corpora 98, Supplement: 1-10.
11. Holker, K. 1991. “Französisch: Partikelforschung. Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik”. V(1): 77-88. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
12. Holmes, J. 1990. “Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech”. Language and Communication 10(3): 185-205.
13. Hopper, P. and E. C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Ilson, R. 1985. “Usage problems in British and American English”. In S. Greenbaum (ed.), The English language today. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
15. Jucker, A. 1993. “The discourse marker well: A relevance-theoretical account”. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 435-452.
16. Krishnamurthy, R. 1987. “The process of compilation”. In Looking Up, John Sinclair (ed.), 62-85. London: Collins.
17. Lenk, U. 1998. Marking discourse coherence; functions of discourse markers in spoken English. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
18. Leung, M. C. M. 1996. The use of the discourse markers “you know”, “well” and “so” in Hong Kong English and British. Unpublished M. Phil. Thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
19. Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Mao, L-M.-R. 1995. “Understanding self and face through compliment responses”. In Language and Culture in Multilingual Societies: Viewpoints and Visions, M. Tickoo (ed.), 209-226. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
21. Ostman, J-O. 1981. You Know: A Discourse-functional Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Ostman, J-O. 1982. “The symbiotic relationship between pragmatic particles and impromptu speech”. In Impromptu speech: a symposium, N. E. Enkvist (ed.) Abo: Abo Akademi.
23. Partington, A. 1993. “Corpus evidence of language learning”. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, M. Baker, G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), 193-212. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
24. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman: London.
25. Schiffrin, D. 1985. “Conversational coherence: The role of well”. Language 61(3): 640-667.
26. Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Schourup, L. 1985. Common discourse particles in English conversation: like, well, y’know. New York: Garland.
28. Schwenter, S. and E. C. Traugott. 2000. “Invoking scalarity: The development of in fact”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1): 7-25.
29. Sinclair, J. (ed.). 1987. Looking Up: An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing. London and Glasgow: Collins ELT.
30. Sinclair, J. et al. 1995. Collins COBUILD English Dictionary. London: HarperCollins Publishers.
31. Sinclair, J. and D. Brazil. 1982. Teacher Talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Stenstrom, A.-B. 1986. “What does really really do? Strategies in speech and writing”. In English in Speech and Writing: A Symposium, G. Tottie, and I. Backlund (eds.). Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm, 149-164.
33. Stenstrom, A.-B. 1994. An Introduction to Spoken English. London: Longman.
34. Svartvik, J. 1980. Well in conversation. In Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, S. Greenbaum et al. (eds.). London: Longman, 167-177.
35. Tognini-Bonelli, E. 1993. “Interpretative nodes in discourse—actual and actually". In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, M. Baker, G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), 193-212. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
36. Watts, R. 1988. “A relevance-theoretic approach to commentary pragmatic markers: the case of actually, really and basically". Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38(1-4): 235-260.