Capturing the varying effects of driving forces over time for the simulation of urban growth by using survival analysis and cellular automata

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 152, Issue , 2016, Pages 59-71

  Chen, Yimin ^a   Li, Xia ^a   Liu, Xiaoping ^a   Ai, Bin ^a   Li, Shaoying ^b  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GUANGZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Patch based simulation; SA Patch CA; Strategy; Survival analysis; Urban growth simulation

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; CALIBRATION; CELLULAR AUTOMATA; DECISION MAKING; LAND USE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; ROBOTS;

CALIBRATION METHOD; GROWTH SIMULATION; PATCH BASED; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; SIMULATION PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION STRATEGIES; STRATEGY; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

URBAN GROWTH;

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FUTURE PROSPECT; LAND USE CHANGE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TIME DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

CHINA; GUANGDONG; SHENZHEN;

EID: 84989324584     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aljoufie M., Zuidgeest M., Brussel M., van Vliet J., van Maarseveen M. A cellular automata-based land use and transport interaction model applied to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 112:89-99.
2. Allison P.D. Survival analysis using SAS: a practical guide 2012, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
3. An L., Brown D.G. Survival analysis in land change science: integrating with GIScience to address temporal complexities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2008, 98(2):323-344.
4. An L., Brown D.G., Nassauer J.I., Low B. Variations in development of exurban residential landscapes: timing, location, and driving forces. Journal of Land Use Science 2011, 6(1):13-32.
5. Barreira-González P., Gómez-Delgado M., Aguilera-Benavente F. From raster to vector cellular automata models: a new approach to simulate urban growth with the help of graph theory. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 2015, 54:119-131.
6. Basse R.M., Omrani H., Charif O., Gerber P., Bódis K. Land use changes modelling using advanced methods: cellular automata and artificial neural networks. The spatial and explicit representation of land cover dynamics at the cross-border region scale. Applied Geography 2014, 53:160-171.
7. Brown D.G., Page S., Riolo R., Zellner M., Rand W. Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2005, 19(2):153-174.
8. Chen Y., Li X., Wang S., Liu X., Ai B. Simulating urban form and energy consumption in the pearl river delta under different development strategies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2013, 103(6):1567-1585.
9. Chen Y.M., Li X., Liu X.P., Ai B. Modeling urban land-use dynamics in a fast developing city using the modified logistic cellular automaton with a patch-based simulation strategy. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2014, 28(2):234-255.
10. Clarke K., Gaydos L. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 1998, 12(7):699-714.
11. Clarke K.C. Why simulate cities?. GeoJournal 2014, 79(2):129-136.
12. Cox D.R. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1972, 187-220.
13. Dietzel C., Herold M., Hemphill J.J., Clarke K.C. Spatio-temporal dynamics in California's Central Valley: empirical links to urban theory. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2005, 19(2):175-195.
14. Dietzel C., Oguz H., Hemphill J., Clarke K., Gazulis N. Diffusion and coalescence of the Houston metropolitan area: evidence supporting a new urban theory. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2005, 32(2):231-246.
15. Fragkias M., Seto K. Evolving rank-size distributions of intra-metropolitan urban clusters in South China. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2009, 33(3):189-199.
16. Güneralp B., Seto K.C. Environmental impacts of urban growth from an integrated dynamic perspective: a case study of Shenzhen, South China. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18(4):720-735.
17. García A.M., Santé I., Boullón M., Crecente R. A comparative analysis of cellular automata models for simulation of small urban areas in Galicia, NW, Spain, Computers. Environment and Urban Systems 2012, 36(4):291-301.
18. Greenberg J.A., Kefauver S.C., Stimson H.C., Yeaton C.J., Ustin S.L. Survival analysis of a neotropical rainforest using multitemporal satellite imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 96(2):202-211.
19. He C., Zhao Y., Tian J., Shi P. Modeling the urban landscape dynamics in a megalopolitan cluster area by incorporating a gravitational field model with cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 113:78-89.
20. Hou Q., Li S. Transport infrastructure development and changing spatial accessibility in the Greater Pearl River Delta, China 1990-2020. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19(6):1350-1360.
21. Kocabas V., Dragicevic S. Assessing cellular automata model behaviour using a sensitivity analysis approach. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 2006, 30(6):921-953.
22. Li X., Yeh A.G.O. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2002, 16(4):323-343.
23. Li X., Yeh A.G.O. Data mining of cellular automata's transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2004, 18(8):723-744.
24. Liu X.P., Li X., Liu L., He J., Ai B. A bottom-up approach to discover transition rules of cellular automata using ant intelligence. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2008, 22(11-12):1247-1269.
25. Liu X., Li X., Chen Y., Tan Z., Li S., Ai B. A new landscape index for quantifying urban expansion using multi-temporal remotely sensed data. Landscape Ecology 2010, 25(5):671-682.
26. Liu X.P., Ma L., Li X., Ai B., Li S.Y., He Z.J. Simulating urban growth by integrating landscape expansion index (LEI) and cellular automata. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2014, 28(1):148-163.
27. McGarigal K., Cushman S., Neel M., Ene E. FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps 2012, Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
28. Meentemeyer R.K., Tang W., Dorning M.A., Vogler J.B., Cunniffe N.J., Shoemaker D.A. FUTURES: multilevel simulations of emerging urban-rural landscape structure using a stochastic patch-Growing algorithm. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2013, 103(4):785-807.
29. Moreno N., Ménard A., Marceau D.J. VecGCA: a vector-based geographic cellular automata model allowing geometric transformations of objects. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2008, 35(4):647-665.
30. Moreno N., Wang F., Marceau D.J. Implementation of a dynamic neighborhood in a land-use vector-based cellular automata model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2009, 33(1):44-54.
31. Ng M.K. Shenzhen. Cities 2003, 20(6):429-441.
32. Ng M.K., Xu J. Second metamorphosis? urban restructuring and planning responses in guangzhou and shenzhen in the twenty-first century. Maturing megacities 2014, 29-60. Springer.
33. Omrani H., Abdallah F., Charif O., Longford N.T. Multi-label class assignment in land-use modelling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2015, 29(6):1023-1041.
34. Pontius R., Walker R., Yao-Kumah R., Arima E., Aldrich S., Caldas M., et al. Accuracy assessment for a simulation model of Amazonian deforestation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2007, 97(4):677-695.
35. Samardžić-Petrović M., Dragićević S., Kovačević M., Bajat B. Modeling urban land use changes using support vector machines. Transactions in GIS 2015, (in press).
36. Santé I., García A., Miranda D., Crecente R. Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: a review and analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 96(2):108-122.
37. Seto K.C., Fragkias M., Güneralp B., Reilly M.K. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS 2011, 6(8):e23777.
38. Seto K.C., Woodcock C.E., Song C., Huang X., Lu J., Kaufmann R.K. Monitoring land-use change in the pearl river delta using landsat TM. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2002, 23(10):1985-2004.
39. Shenzhen Municipality, 2010, The Comprehensive Plan of Shenzhen City 2010-2020, (accessed 01.04.16.). http://www.szpl.gov.cn/xxgk/csgh/csztgh/201009/t20100929_60694.htm.
40. Shin H.B. Urban spatial restructuring, event-led development and scalar politics. Urban Studies 2014, 51(14):2961-2978.
41. Stevens D., Dragicevic S., Rothley K. iCity: a GIS-CA modelling tool for urban planning and decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software 2007, 22(6):761-773.
42. Sui D., Zeng H. Modeling the dynamics of landscape structure in Asia's emerging desakota regions: a case study in Shenzhen. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 53(1-4):37-52.
43. Tayyebi A., Pijanowski B.C. Modeling multiple land use changes using ANN, CART and MARS: Comparing tradeoffs in goodness of fit and explanatory power of data mining tools. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2014, 28:102-116.
44. Wang F., Marceau D.J. A patch-based cellular automaton for simulating land-use changes at fine spatial resolution. Transactions in GIS 2013, 17(6):828-846.
45. Wang N., Brown D.G., An L., Yang S., Ligmann-Zielinska A. Comparative performance of logistic regression and survival analysis for detecting spatial predictors of land-use change. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2013, 27(10):1960-1982.
46. Wu F. Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2002, 16(8):795-818.