Multi-label class assignment in land-use modelling

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1023-1041

  Omrani, Hichem ^a   Abdallah, Fahed ^b   Charif, Omar ^c   Longford, Nicholas T ^d  

^a LUXEMBOURG INSTITUTE OF SOCIO ECONOMIC RESEARCH LISER   (Luxembourg)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^d Statistics Research and Consulting SNTL   (Spain)

Author keywords

geographic information systems; land use modelling; machine learning; multi label

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; GIS; LAND USE CHANGE; LEARNING; MODELING;

BELGIUM; LUXEMBOURG [BELGIUM];

EID: 84933679301     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2015.1008004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. R.M.Basse,, et al., 2014. Land use changes modelling using advanced methods: cellular automata and artificial neural networks. The spatial and explicit representation of land cover dynamics at the cross-border region scale. Applied Geography, 53, 160–171. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.016
2. M.Batty,, 2011. Modeling and simulation in geographic information science: integrated models and grand challenges. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 10–17. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.003
3. J.M.Bernardo, and A.F.Smith,, 2009. Bayesian theory. Vol. 405. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
4. M.R.Boutell,, et al., 2004. Learning multi-label scene classification. Pattern Recognition, 37, 1757–1771. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2004.03.009
5. O.Charif,, et al., 2012. Cellular automata model based on machine learning methods for simulating land use change. In: O. Rose, ed. Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 9–12 December, Berlin. IEEE, 1–12.
6. H.Couclelis,, 2005. “Where has the future gone?” Rethinking the role of integrated land-use models in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1353–1371. doi:10.1068/a3785
7. J.R.Eastman,, L.A.Solórzano,, and M.E.V.Fossen,, 2005. Transition potential modeling for land-cover change. In: D.Maguire, M.Batty, and M.Goodchild, eds. GIS, spatial analysis and modeling. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press, 357–385.
8. R.E.Fan, and C.J.Lin,, 2007. A study on threshold selection for multi-label classification. Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University, 1–23.
9. S.Ferrier, and A.Guisan,, 2006. Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 393–404. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01149.x
10. G.Grekousis,, P.Manetos,, and Y.N.Photis,, 2013. Modeling urban evolution using neural networks, fuzzy logic and GIS: the case of the Athens metropolitan area. Cities, 30, 193–203. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.03.006
11. R.J.Hijmans,, et al., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965–1978. doi:10.1002/joc.1276
12. B.Huang,, C.Xie,, and R.Tay,, 2010. Support vector machines for urban growth modeling. Geoinformatica, 14, 83–99. doi:10.1007/s10707-009-0077-4
13. X.Jiang,, M.Lin,, and J.Zhao,, 2011. Woodland cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and artificial neural networks classification algorithms. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), Vol. 2, 28–29 March, Shenzhen. IEEE, 312–315.
14. J.Jones,, J.Miller,, and M.White,, 2011. Multi-label classification for multi-species distribution modeling. In: L. Getoor and T. Scheffer, eds. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning, New York, NY, 1–4.
15. K.Kok,, et al., 2001. A method and application of multi-scale validation in spatial land use models. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85, 223–238. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00186-4
16. H.Lin,, et al., 2005. Modeling urban sprawl and land use change in a coastal area – a neural network approach. In: Proceedings of the 2005 annual meeting, 24–27July, Providence, RI.
17. J.F.Mas,, et al., 2004. Modelling deforestation using GIS and artificial neural networks. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19, 461–471. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00161-0
18. X.Niu,, C.Shao,, and X.Wang,, 2006. A survey of digital vector map watermarking. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 2, 1301–1316.
19. H.Omrani,, et al., 2012. Simulation of land use changes using cellular automata and artificial neural network. Technical report, CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper.
20. B.Pijanowski,, et al., 2002. Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: a land transformation model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26, 553–575. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00015-1
21. B.C.Pijanowski,, et al., 2014. A big data urban growth simulation at a national scale: configuring the GIS and neural network based Land Transformation Model to run in a High Performance Computing (HPC) environment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 51, 250–268. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.015
22. R.G.PontiusJr. and M.L.Cheuk,, 2006. A generalized cross-tabulation matrix to compare soft-classified maps at multiple resolutions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20, 1–30. doi:10.1080/13658810500391024
23. R.G.PontiusJr., J.D.Cornell,, and C.A.Hall,, 2001. Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: application and validation for Costa Rica. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85, 191–203. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00183-9
24. F.Sangermano,, J.R.Eastman,, and H.Zhu,, 2010. Similarity weighted instance-based learning for the generation of transition potentials in land use change modeling. Transactions in GIS, 14, 569–580. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01226.x
25. E.Spyromitros,, G.Tsoumakas,, and I.Vlahavas,, 2008. An empirical study of lazy multilabel classification algorithms. In: J. Darzentas et al., eds. Proceedings of the artificial intelligence: theories, models and applications, 2–4 October, Syros. Berlin: Springer, 401–406.
26. A.Tayyebi,, et al., 2013. Hierarchical modeling of urban growth across the conterminous USA: developing meso-scale quantity drivers for the Land Transformation Model. Journal of Land Use Science, 8, 422–442. doi:10.1080/1747423X.2012.675364
27. A.Tayyebi, and B.C.Pijanowski,, 2014. Modeling multiple land use changes using ANN, CART and MARS: comparing tradeoffs in goodness of fit and explanatory power of data mining tools. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 28, 102–116. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2013.11.008
28. A.Tayyebi,, et al., 2014. Comparing three global parametric and local non-parametric models to simulate land use change in diverse areas of the world. Environmental Modelling & Software, 59, 202–221. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.022
29. A.Tayyebi,, B.C.Pijanowski,, and A.H.Tayyebi,, 2011. An urban growth boundary model using neural networks, GIS and radial parameterization: an application to Tehran, Iran. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 35–44. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.007
30. C.Tomas,, et al., 2012. Development of an activity-based cellular automata land-use model: the case of Flanders, Belgium. In: R. Seppelt et al., eds. Proceedings of the international Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), 1–5 July, Leipzig, 2000–2007.
31. G.Tsoumakas, and I.Katakis,, 2007. Multi-label classification: an overview. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM), 3, 1–13. doi:10.4018/jdwm.2007070101
32. P.H.Verburg,, B.Eickhout,, and H.Van Meijl,, 2008. A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use. The Annals of Regional Science, 42, 57–77. doi:10.1007/s00168-007-0136-4
33. P.H.Verburg,, et al., 2004. Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B, 31, 125–150. doi:10.1068/b307
34. R.White, and G.Engelen,, 2000. High-resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24, 383–400. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00012-0
35. R.White,, I.Uljee,, and G.Engelen,, 2012. Integrated modelling of population, employment and land-use change with a multiple activity-based variable grid cellular automaton. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26, 1251–1280. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.635146
36. X.Wu,, et al., 2008. Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowledge and Information Systems, 14, 1–37. doi:10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2
37. Q.Yang,, X.Li,, and X.Shi,, 2008. Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines. Computers & Geosciences, 34, 592–602. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2007.08.003
38. Q.Yang,, et al., 2012. Multi-label classification models for sustainable flood retention basins. Environmental Modelling & Software, 32, 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.001
39. Y.Yang,, 1999. An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Information Retrieval, 1, 69–90. doi:10.1023/A:1009982220290
40. M.L.Zhang, and K.Zhang,, 2010. Multi-label learning by exploiting label dependency. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 999–1008.
41. M.L.Zhang, and Z.H.Zhou,, 2007. ML-KNN: a lazy learning approach to multi-label learning. Pattern Recognition, 40, 2038–2048. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2006.12.019