The accuracy of ultrashort echo time MRI sequences for medical additive manufacturing

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2016, Pages

  Van Eijnatten, Maureen ^a   Rijkhorst, Erik Jan ^a   Hofman, Mark ^a   Forouzanfar, Tymour ^a   Wolff, Jan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dimensional measurement accuracy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Printing, threedimensional; Tomography, X ray computed

Indexed keywords

CADAVER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME FACTOR; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

CADAVER; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MANDIBLE; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84989225403     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150424     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ramasamy M, Giri, Raja R, Subramonian, Karthik, Narendrakumar R. Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013; 5: S98-102. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4103/0975-7406.113306
2. Voss JO, Varjas V, Raguse JD, Thieme N, Richards RG, Kamer L. Computed tomography-based virtual fracture reduction techniques in bimandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44: 177-85. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.11.010
3. Yu H, Wang X, Zhang S, Zhang L, Xin P, Shen SG. Navigationguided en bloc resection and defect reconstruction of craniomaxillary bony tumours. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42: 1409-13. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.05.011
4. Schepers RH, Kraeima J, Vissink A, Lahoda LU, Roodenburg JL, Reintsema H, et al. Accuracy of secondary maxillofacial reconstruction with prefabricated fibula grafts using 3D planning and guided reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg Jan 2016. Epub ahead of print. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.12.008
5. Li Y, Jiang Y, Ye B, Hu J, Chen Q, Zhu S. Treatment of dentofacial deformities secondary to osteochondroma of the mandibular condyle using virtual surgical planning and 3-dimensional printed surgical templates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74: 349-68. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.06.169
6. Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 2015; 219: 521-9. doi: Http://dx. doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914
7. Mazzoni S, Bianchi A, Schiariti G, Badiali G, Marchetti C. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing cutting guides and customized titanium plates are useful in upper maxilla waferless repositioning. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73: 701-7. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.10.028
8. Kontio R. Update on mandibular reconstruction: Computer-aided design, imaging, stem cells and future applications. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 22: 307-15. doi: Http://dx.doi. org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000065
9. Aguiar MF, Marques AP, Carvalho AC, Cavalcanti MG. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography for implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 362-5. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1600-0501.2007.01490.x
10. Huotilainen E, Jaanimets R, Valášek J, Marcián P, Salmi M, Tuomi J, et al. Inaccuracies in additive manufactured medical skull models caused by the DICOM to STL conversion process. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42: E259-65. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.10.001
11. Huotilainen E, Paloheimo M, Salmi M, Paloheimo KS, Björkstrand R, Tuomi J, et al. Imaging requirements for medical applications of additive manufacturing. Acta Radiol 2014; 55: 78-85. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0284185113494198
12. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor HU, et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: Review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010; 5: 335-41. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11548-010-0476-x
13. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 267-71. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028
14. Lorenzoni DC, Bolognese AM, Garib DG, Guedes FR, Sant'anna EF. Cone-beam computed tomography and radiographs in dentistry: Aspects elated to radiation dose. Int J Dent 2012; 2012: 813768. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/813768
15. Nauer CB, Rieke A, Zubler C, Candreia C, Arnold A, Senn P. Low-dose temporal bone CT in infants and young children: Effective dose and image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1375-80. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2524
16. Ono K, Hiraoka T, Ono A, Komatsu E, Shigenaga T, Takaki H, et al. Low-dose CT scan screening for lung cancer: Comparison of images and radiation doses between low-dose CT and follow-up standard diagnostic CT. Springerplus 2013; 2: 393. doi: Http://dx. doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-393
17. Lutz J, Jager V, Hempel MJ, Srivastav S, Reiser M, Jäger L. Delineation of temporal bone anatomy: Feasibility of low-dose 64-row CT in regard to image quality. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2638-45. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0578-1
18. Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA, Shailam R, Liu B, Toth TL, et al. Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 2009; 252: 200-8. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ radiol.2521081554
19. Imamura H, Sato H, Matsuura T, Ishikawa M, Zeze R. A comparative study of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of mandibular canals and cross-sectional areas in diagnosis prior to dental implant treatment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6: 75-81
20. Kawai T, Asaumi R, Kagawa T, Inadomi D, Yuasa K, Yosue T. The observation of the incisive branches of mandibular canal-the comparison between MRI vs. CBCT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 456. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12458-434
21. Horch RA, Nyman JS, Gochberg DF, Dortch RD, Does MD. Characterization of 1H NMR signal in human cortical bone for magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 680-7. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22459
22. Keereman V, Fierens Y, Broux T, De Deene Y, Lonneux M, Vandenberghe S. MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/ MRI using ultrashort echo time sequences. J Nucl Med 2010; 51: 812-18. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.065425
23. Aitken AP, Giese D, Tsoumpas C, Schleyer P, Kozerke S, Prieto C, et al. Improved UTE-based attenuation correction for cranial PET-MR using dynamic magnetic field monitoring. Med Phys 2014; 41: 012302. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4837315
24. Huisman M, Lam MK, Bartels LW, Nijenhuis RJ, Moonen CT, Knuttel FM, et al. Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases. J Ther Ultrasound 2014; 2: 16. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/2050-5736-2-16
25. Liao H, Inomata T, Sakuma I, Dohi T. 3-D augmented reality for MRI-guided surgery using integral videography autostereoscopic image overlay. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010; 57: 1476-86. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2010.2040278
26. Metcalfe P, Liney GP, Holloway L,Walker A, BartonM, Delaney GP, et al. The potential for an enhanced role for MRI in radiation-therapy treatment planning. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2013; 12: 429-46
27. Schendel SA, Jacobson R. Three-dimensional imaging and computer simulation for office-based surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 2107-14. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. joms.2009.04.111
28. Giannatsis J, Dedoussis V. Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: A review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2009; 40: 116-27. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170- 007-1308-1
29. Koivisto J. The use of MOSFET dosimeters and anthropomorphic phantoms in low dose dental CBCT applications. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki; 2015
30. Implications of commission recommendations that doses be kept as low as readily achievable. ICRP publication 22. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1973
31. White D, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB. Accuracy of MRI vs CT imaging with particular reference to patient specific templates for total knee replacement surgery. Int J Med Robot 2008; 4: 224-31. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcs.201
32. Lee YS, Seon JK, Shin VI, Kim GH, Jeon M. Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model. Biomed Eng Online 2008; 7: 6. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-7-6
33. Van den Broeck J, Vereecke E, Wirix-Speetjens R, Vander Sloten J. Segmentation accuracy of long bones. Med Eng Phys 2014; 36: 949-53. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.03.016
34. Apajalahti S, Kelppe J, Kontio R, Hagström J. Imaging characteristics of ameloblastomas and diagnostic value of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in a series of 26 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015; 120: E118-30. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.05.002
35. Schmutz B, Rahmel B, McNamara Z, Coulthard A, Schuetz M, Lynham A. Magnetic resonance imaging: An accurate, radiationfree, alternative to computed tomography for the primary imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction of the bony orbit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72: 611-18