The effects of video recording on office workers’ conduct, and the validity of video data for the study of naturally-occurring interactions

Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Tuncer, Sylvaine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Embodied interactions; Encounters in offices; Iterative production of informed consent; Jokes; Moral assessments; Orientations to the cameras

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989170251     PISSN: 14385627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Clayman, Steven (2013). Agency in response. The role of prefatory address terms. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 290-302.
2. Deppermann, Arnulf (2013). Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 1-7.
3. Drew, Paul (1989). Recalling someone from the past. In Derek Roger & Peter Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp.96-115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
4. Drew, Paul (1998). Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 295-325.
5. Fele, Giolo (2008). The collaborative production of responses and dispatching on the radio: Video analysis in a medical emergency call center. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), Art. 40, http: //nbn-resolving.de/urn: nbn: de: 0114-fqs0803408[Accessed: July 30, 2016].
6. Glenn, Philip (2010). Laughter in interaction. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Goffman, Erving (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
8. Goffman, Erving (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25, 1-29.
9. Gordon, Cynthia (2012). Beyond the observer’s paradox: The audio-recorder as a resource for the display of identity. Qualitative Research, 13(3), 299-317.
10. Greiffenhagen, Christian (2008). Video analysis of mathematical practice? Different attempts to “open up” mathematics for sociological investigation. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 32, http: //nbn-resolving.de/urn: nbn: de: 0114-fqs0803323[Accessed: July 30, 2016].
11. Haddington, Pentti; Mondada, Lorenza & Nevile, Maurice (Eds.) (2013). Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion. Berlin: De Gruyter.
12. Hazel, Spencer (2016). The paradox from within: Research participants doing-being-observed. Qualitative Research, 16(4), 446-467.
13. Heath, Christian (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Heritage, John C. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In John Maxwell Atkinson & John C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.299-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Hindmarsh, Jonathan & Heath, Christian (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1855-1878.
16. Holt, Elizabeth (2010). The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1513-1525.
17. Hutchby, Ian (2001). The moral status of technology: Being recorded, being heard, and the construction of children’s concern about family relationships. In Ian Hutchby & Jo Moran-Ellis (Eds.), Children, technology and culture (pp.104-122). London: Routledge Falmer.
18. Hutchby, Ian; O’Reilly, Michelle & Parker, Nicola (2012). Ethics in praxis: Negotiating the presence and functions of a video camera in family therapy. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 675-690.
19. Jefferson, Gail (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.13-31). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
20. Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
21. Laurier, Eric & Philo, Chris (2006). Natural problems of naturalistic video data. In Hubert Knoblauch, Jürgen Raab, Hans-Georg Soeffner & Bernt Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis methodology and methods, qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology (pp.183-192). Bern: Peter Lang Publishing Group.
22. Levinson, Stephen (2013). Action formation and ascription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.103-130), Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell.
23. Lomax, Helen, & Casey, Neil (1998). Recording social life: Reflexivity and video methodology. Sociological Research Online, 3(2), http: //www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/3/2/1.html[Accessed: June 26, 2013].
24. Mazeland, Harry (2007). Parenthetical sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), 1816-1869.
25. Monahan, Torin & Fisher, Jill A. (2010). Benefits of observer effects: Lessons from the field. Qualitative Research, 10(3), 357-376.
26. Mondada, Lorenza (2006). Video recording as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In Hubert Knoblauch, Jürgen Raab, Hans-Georg Soeffner & Bernt Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis methodology and methods, qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology (pp.51-68), Bern: Peter Lang Publishing Group.
27. Mondada, Lorenza (2008). Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 39, http: //nbn-resolving.de/urn: nbn: de: 0114-fqs0803390[Accessed: July 30, 2016].
28. Mondada, Lorenza (2014). Conventions for multimodal transcription. Available from https: //franz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/franz/user_upload/redaktion/Mondada_conv_multimodality.pdf [Accessed: June 10, 2016].
29. Orwell, George (1949). 1984. London: Secker & Warburg.
30. Potter, Jonathan & Hepburn, Alexa (2010). Putting aspirations into words: “Laugh particles”, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1543-1555.
31. Raymond, Geoffrey (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939-967.
32. Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Blackwell.
33. Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3-4), 104-152.
34. Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp.101-134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (2001). Getting serious: Joke serious “no”. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1947-1955.
36. Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (2005). On complainability. Social Problems, 52(3), 449-476.
37. Schegloff, Emmanuel A. & Sacks, Harvey (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289-327.
38. Sparrman, Anna (2005). Video recording as interaction: Participant observation of children’s everyday life. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(3), 241-255.
39. Speer, Susan A. & Hutchby, Ian (2003). From ethics to analytics: Aspects of participants’ orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices. Sociology, 39, 315-337.
40. Speer, Susan & Stokoe, Elizabeth (2014). Ethics in action: Consent-gaining interactions and implications for research practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 54-73.
41. Stokoe, Elizabeth (2009). “For the benefit of the tape”: Formulating embodied-conduct in designedly uni-modal recorded police-suspect interrogations. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1887-1904.
42. Streeck, Jürgen; Goodwin, Charles & LeBaron, Curtis D. (Eds.) (2011). Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.