A computational model for ranking cloud service providers using hypergraph based techniques

Future Generation Computer Systems

Volumn 68, Issue , 2017, Pages 14-30

  Somu, Nivethitha ^a   Kirthivasan, Kannan ^a   V S , Shankar Sriram ^a  

^a SASTRA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Cloud service ranking; Helly property; Hypergraph; Minimum distance algorithm; Service Measurement Index (SMI)

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS;

CLOUD SERVICES; HELLY PROPERTIES; HYPERGRAPH; MINIMUM DISTANCE; SERVICE MEASUREMENTS;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 84988841912     PISSN: 0167739X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2016.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. [1] Krautheim, Frank John, Building trust into utility cloud computing. (Ph.D. diss.), 2010, University of Maryland.
2. [2] Njeh, Felix N., Cloud computing: An evaluation of the cloud computing adoption and use model. (Ph.D. diss.), 2014, Bowie State University.
3. [3] Mell, Peter, Grance, Tim, The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. 2011.
4. [4] Buyya, R., Yeo, C., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., Brandic, I., Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 25:6 (2009), 599–616.
5. [5] Firdhous, Mohamed, Ghazali, Osman, Hassan, Suhaidi, Applying bees algorithm for trust management in cloud computing. Bio-Inspired Models of Networks, Information, and Computing Systems, 2012, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 224–229.
6. [6] Marudhadevi, D., Neelaya Dhatchayani, V., Shankar Sriram, V.S., A trust evaluation model for cloud computing using service level agreement. Comput. J., 2014, 1–8.
7. [7] Thampi, Sabu M., Bhargava, Bharat, Atrey, Pradeep K., (eds.) Managing Trust in Cyberspace, 2013, CRC Press.
8. [8] Zeleny, Milan, Cochrane, James L., Multiple Criteria Decision Making. 1973, University of South Carolina Press.
9. [9] CSMIC Consortium, Service Measurement Index Version 1.0, Carnegie Mellon University Silicon Valley Moffett Field, CA USA, 2011, pp. 1–8.
10. [10] C. Binnig, D. Kossmann, T. Kraska, S. Loesing, How is the weather tomorrow?: towards a benchmark for the cloud, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Testing Database Systems, RI, USA, 2009.
11. [11] Costa, P.M.A.C., Evaluating cloud services using multicriteria decision analysis. (Dissertation), 2013.
12. [12] Sidhu, Jagpreet, Singh, Sarbjeet, Compliance based trustworthiness calculation mechanism in cloud environment. Procedia Comput. Sci. 37 (2014), 439–446.
13. [13] Dhatchayani, V.Neelaya, Shankar Sriram, V.S., Trust aware identity management for cloud computing. Int. J. Inf. Comm. Technol. 6:3–4 (2014), 369–380.
14. [14] Robert John Hennan, John G. Roane, Security monitoring tool for computer network. US Patent 7,904,456, issued March 8, 2011.
15. [15] Barth, Wolfgang., Nagios: System and Network Monitoring. 2008, No Starch Press.
16. [16] Qu, Lie, Wang, Yan, Orgun, Mehmet A., Liu, Ling, Bouguettaya, Athman, Cloud service selection based on contextual subjective assessment and objective assessment. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2014, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1483–1484.
17. [17] Singh, Sushil, Chand, Deepak, Trust evaluation in cloud based on friends and third party's recommendations. Engineering and Computational Sciences (RAECS), 2014 Recent Advances in, 2014.
18. [18] IEEE Standards Association and Others, IEEE STD 1061–1998, IEEE standard for a software quality metrics methodology, 1998.
19. [19] X.Y. Ang Li, Srikanth Kandula, Ming Zhang, CloudCmp: Comparing Public Cloud Providers, Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, 2011, pp. 1–14.
20. [20] X.Y. , Srikanth Kandula, Ming Zhang, CloudCmp:Shopping for a Cloud Made Easy, 2nd USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing 2010, pp. 1–7.
21. [21] CloudHarmony, 2009, http://www.cloudharmony.com.
22. [22] Z. Rehman, O.K. Hussain, S. Parvin, F.K. Hussain, A Framework for User Feedback Based Cloud Service Monitoring, Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems 2012, pp. 257–262.
23. [23] Chunjie LUO1, J., Zhen, LeiWang, LU, Gang, Zhang, Lixin, XU, Cheng-Zhong, Sun, Ninghui, CloudRankD: Benchmarking and Ranking Cloud Computing Systems for Data Processing Applications. Front. Comput. Sci. 6:4 (2012), 347–362.
24. [24] T. Abubakr, Cloud Sleuth, 2011, https://www.cloudsleuth.net.
25. [25] V. Sobel, S. Subramanyam, A. Sucharitakul, J. Nguyen, Cloudstone: Multi-Platform, Multi-Language Benchmark and Measurement Tools for Web 2.0, First Workshop on Cloud Computing and Its Application, Chicago, IL, October 22–23, 2008, pp. 1–6.
26. [26] Chan, H., Ranking and Mapping of Applications to Cloud Computing Services by SVD. 2010, 362–369.
27. [27] Choudhury, P., Sharma, M., Vikas, K., Pranshu, T., Satyanarayana, V., Service ranking systems for cloud vendors. Adv. Mater. Res. 433–440 (2012), 3949–3953.
28. [28] Preeti Gulia, S., Automatic Selection and Ranking of Cloud Providers using Service Level Agreements. Int. J. Comput. Appl., 72(11), 2013.
29. [29] S.C. Tejas Chauhan, M. Vikas Kumar, Bhise, Service level agreement parameter matching in cloud computing, 2011.
30. [30] Cirrocumulus: A Semantic Framework for Application and core Services Portability across Heterogeneous Clouds, project at Kno-e-sis Center at Wright State University, 2010.
31. [31] Qu, L., Wang, Y., Orgun, M., Cloud Service Selection Based on the Aggregation of User Feedback and Quantitative Performance Assessment. 2013, 152–159.
32. [32] Zheng, Z., Wu, X., Zhang, Y., Lyu, M., Wang, J., QoS ranking prediction for cloud services. J. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 24:6 (2012), 1213–1222.
33. [33] Garg, S.K., Versteeg, S., Buyya, R., A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29:4 (2013), 1012–1023.
34. [34] Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S., Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European J. Oper. Res. 169:1 (2006), 1–29.
35. [35] Berge, Claude., Graphs and Hypergraphs Vol. 7. 1973, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
36. [36] Berge, Claude., Hypergraphs: Combinatorics of Finite Sets. Vol. 45. 1984, Elsevier.
37. [37] Dharmarajan, R., Kannan, K., A hypergraph-based algorithm for image restoration from salt and pepper noise. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 64:12 (2010), 1114–1122.
38. [38] Bretto, Alain, Cherifi, Hocine, Aboutajdine, Driss, Hypergraph imaging: an overview. Pattern Recognit. 35:3 (2002), 651–658.
39. [39] Bretto, A., Cherifi, H., A noise cancellation algorithm based on hypergraph modeling. Digital Signal Processing Workshop Proceedings, 1996, IEEE, 5–8.
40. [40] Bretto, Alain, Cherifi, Hocine, Ubéda, Stéphane, An efficient algorithm for Helly property recognition in a linear hypergraph. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 46 (2001), 177–187.
41. [41] Kannan, Kirthivasan, Rajesh Kanna, B., Aravindan, Chandrabose, Root mean square filter for noisy images based on hyper graph model. Image Vis. Comput. 28:9 (2010), 1329–1338.
42. [42] David S. Moore, Chi-Square Tests. No. Mimeograph. purdue univ lafayette ind dept of statistics, 1976.
43. [43] Sivakumar, A., Kannan, K., A novel feature selection technique for number classification problem using PNN—A plausible scheme for boiler flue gas analysis. Sensors Actuators B 139:2 (2009), 280–286.
44. [44] Chen, Yihua, Gupta, Maya R., Em demystified: An Expectation-Maximization Tutorial. 2010, University of Washington.
45. [45] A. Li, X. Yang, S. Kandula, M. Zhang, CloudCmp: comparing public cloud providers, in: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Internet Measurement, Melbourne, Australia, 2010.
46. [46] Schad, J., Dittrich, J., Quiane-Ruiz, J., Runtime measurements in the cloud: observing, analyzing, and reducing variance. Proc. VLDB Endow. 3:1–2 (2010), 460–471.
47. [47] A. Iosup, N. Yigitbasi, D. Epema, On the performance variability of production cloud services, in: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing, CA, USA.
48. [48] Karypis, George, et al. Multilevel hypergraph partitioning: applications in VLSI domain. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 7:1 (1999), 69–79.