Non Additive Robust Ordinal Regression for urban and territorial planning: an application for siting an urban waste landfill

Annals of Operations Research

Volumn 245, Issue 1-2, 2016, Pages 427-456

  Angilella, Silvia ^a   Bottero, Marta ^b   Corrente, Salvatore ^a   Ferretti, Valentina ^b   Greco, Salvatore ^a,c   Lami, Isabella M ^b  

^a University of Catania and CESifo Research Network   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Choquet integral; Indirect preference information; NAROR; Urban and territorial planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922442245     PISSN: 02545330     EISSN: 15729338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-015-1787-7     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Angilella, S., Corrente, S., & Greco, S. (2015). Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 172–182.
2. Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral. In R. Purshouse et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of EMO 2013, EMO 2013. LNCS 7811, pp. 475–489.
3. Angilella, S., Greco, S., Lamantia, F., & Matarazzo, B. (2004). Assessing non-additive utility for multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(3), 734–744.
4. Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2010a). Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1), 277–288.
5. Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2010b). The most representative utility function for non-additive robust ordinal regression. In E. Hullermeier, R. Kruse, and F. Hoffmann (Eds.) Proceedings of IPMU 2010, IPMU 2010 (pp. 220–257), LNAI 6178. Springer, Heidelberg.
6. ATO-R (Associazione d’Ambito Torinese per il Governo dei Rifiuti) (2007). Discarica per rifiuti non pericolosi del pinerolese. http://www.atorifiutitorinese.it/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=80&Itemid=96
7. Bobbio, L. (2011). Conflitti territoriali: sei interpretazioni. Tema, 4(4), 79–88.
8. Bottero, M., Ferretti, V., & Mondini, G. (2013). A Choquet integral—based approach for assessing the sustainability of a new waste incinerator. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 3(2/3), 157–177.
9. Brans, J. P., & Vincke, Ph. (1985). A preference ranking organisation method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science, 31(6), 647–656.
10. Chateauneuf, A., & Jaffray, J. Y. (1989). Some characterizations of lower probabilities and other monotone capacities through the use of Möbius inversion. Mathematical Social Sciences, 17, 263–283.
11. Choquet, G. (1953). Theory of capacities. Annales Institute Fourier, 5(54), 131–295.
12. Corrente, S., Figueira, J. R., & Greco, S. (2014a). Dealing with interaction between bipolar multiple criteria preferences in PROMETHEE method. Annals of Operations Research, 217(1), 137–164.
13. Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2012). Multiple criteria hierarchy process in robust ordinal regression. Decision Support Systems, 53(3), 660–674.
14. Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2013a). Multiple criteria hierarchy process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Omega, 41(5), 820–846.
15. Corrente, S., Greco, S., Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2013b). Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking. Machine Learning, 93(2–3), 381–422.
16. Corrente, S., Greco, S., Kadziński, M., Słowiński, R. (2014b). Robust ordinal regression. Wiley Encycolpedia of Operations Research and Management Science, 1–10.
17. Dente, B. (2014). Understanding policy decisions. Berlin: Springer.
18. Ferretti, V., & Pomarico, S. (2013). Ecological land suitability analysis through spatial indicators: An application of the Analytic Network Process technique and Ordered Weighted Average approach. Ecological Indicators, 34, 507–519.
19. Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (Eds.). (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Berlin: Springer.
20. Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Roy, B. (2009). ELECTRE methods with interaction between criteria: An extension of the concordance index. European Journal of Operational Research, 199, 478–495.
21. Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2010). Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(2), 460–486.
22. Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Identifying the “most representative” value function among all compatible value functions in the GRIP. In Proceedings of the 68th EURO Working Group on MCDA, Chania, October 2008.
23. Foster, S. S. D. (1987). Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In W. van Duijvenbooden, & H. G. van Waegeningh (Eds.) TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague. Vulnerability of soil and ground- water to pollutants, Proceedings and Information, vol. 38, pp. 69–86.
24. Giove, S., Rosato, P., & Breil, M. (2011). An application of multicriteria decision making to built heritage. The redevelopment of Venice Arsenale. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 17(3–4), 85–99.
25. Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A. (2013). Introduction to environmental impact assessment. London: Routledge.
26. Grabisch, M. (1996). The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 89(3), 445–456.
27. Grabisch, M. (1997). k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 92, 167–189.
28. Grabisch, M., & Labreuche, C. (2010). A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. Annals of Operations Research, 175(1), 247–286.
29. Grabisch, M., Kojadinovic, I., & Meyer, P. (2008). A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 766–785.
30. GKMS: Robust ordinal regression for outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 214(1), 118–135.
31. S -GROUP. Decision Support Systems, 52, 549–561.
32. Greco, S., Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2011b). Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria sorting. Computers & Operations Research, 38, 1620–1637.
33. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (2001). Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 1–47.
34. Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 191(2), 416–436.
35. Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2014). Robust ordinal regression for value functions handling interacting criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(3), 711–730.
36. Kadziński, M., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2011). Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria ranking and choice. European Journal of Operational Research, 217(3), 541–553.
37. Kadziński, M., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2012a). Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression. Omega, 40(4), 488–501.
38. Kadziński, M., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2012b). Selection of a representative set of parameters for robust ordinal regression outranking methods. Computers & Operations Research, 39(11), 2500–2519.
39. Kadziński, M., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Selection of a representative value function for robust ordinal regression in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(3), 429–462.
40. Kadziński, M., & Tervonen, T. (2013). Robust multi-criteria ranking with additive value models and holistic pair-wise preference statements. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(1), 169–180.
41. Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
42. Lahdelma, R., Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, P. (1998). SMAA-Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 106, 137–143.
43. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. New York: Wiley.
44. Marichal, J. L., & Roubens, M. (2000). Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(3), 641–650.
45. Mousseau, V., Figueira, J. R., Dias, L., Gomes da Silva, C., & Climaco, J. (2003). Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 72–93.
46. Munda, G. (2005). Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy, 23(1), 86–94.
47. Murofushi, S., & Soneda, T. (1993). Techniques for reading fuzzy measures (III): Interaction index. In 9th fuzzy systems symposium, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 693–696.
48. Rosenhead, J., & Mingers, J. (Eds.). (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic word Revised. Chichester: Wiley.
49. Rota, G. C. (1964). On the foundations of combinatorial theory I. Theory of Möbius functions. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, 2, 340–368.
50. Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritère à la décision: méthodes et cas. Paris: Economica.
51. Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO Journal on Decision Process, 1, 69–97.
52. Singh, R. S., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecologial Indicators, 15, 281–299.
53. Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
54. Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. In A. W. Tucker & H. W. Kuhn (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
55. Tervonen, T., & Figueira, J. R. (2008). A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 15(1–2), 1–14.
56. Wakker, P. P. (1989). Additive representations of preferences: A new foundation of decision analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.