Anomalous momentum dependence of the quasiparticle scattering rate in overdoped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 16, 2002, Pages 167002/1-167002/4

  Bogdanov, P V ^a   Lanzara, A ^a,b   Zhou, X J ^a   Yang, W L ^b   Eisaki, H ^a   Hussain, Z ^b   Shen, Z X ^a  

^a SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84988768629     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.167002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Z.-X. Shen and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1771 (1997).
2. A. Ino, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4137 (2000).
3. J. C. Campuzano et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3709 (1999).
4. C. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4245 (1998).
5. N. P. Armitage et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 147003 (2001).
6. B. Wells et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 964 (1995).
7. F. Ronning et al., Science 282, 2067 (1998).
8. D. L. Feng et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5550 (2001).
9. Y. D. Chuang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 117002 (2001).
10. P. V. Bogdanov et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 180505 (2001).
11. A. A. Kordyuk et al., cond-mat/0110379.
12. A. Lanzara et al., Nature (London) 412, 510 (2001).
13. H. Y. Kee et al., cond-mat/0100478.
14. M. Eschrig et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3261 (2000).
15. Ar. Abanov et al., cond-mat/0112126.
16. P. D. Johnson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 177007 (2001).
17. A. D. Gromko et al., cond-mat/0202329.
18. O. K. Andersen et al., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 12, 1573 (1995).
19. Here one does not see the double structure (sometimes called "peak-dip-hump" structure) expected from coupling with collective modes such as phonons [12]. Two factors contribute. First, the effect is weaker in over-doped samples [12]. Second, the effect is strong only when the quasiparticle has an energy comparable to that of a phonon, not at the Fermi energy as in this case, [S. LaShell et al., Phys. Rev. B 61, 271 (2000)].
20. A. Fedorov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2179 (1999).
21. Y = 0 mirror plane. It means that data from the second quadrant was taken with an angular acceptance function rotated 90° with respect to the band structure. The fact that the results from the two quadrants are the same implies that the effect of angular acceptance in the data is small.
22. J. Rossat-Mignod et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 235C, 59 (1994).
23. H. F. Fong et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 316 (1995).
24. P. Dai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5425 (1996).
25. H. F. Fong et al., Nature (London) 398, 588 (1999).
26. J. P. Carbotte et al., Nature (London) 401, 354 (1999).