Intra-household bargaining for school trip accompaniment of children: A group decision approach

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 94, Issue , 2016, Pages 222-234

  Ermagun, Alireza ^a   Levinson, David ^a,b  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Escorting children; Group decision; Policy; School trips; Travel behavior

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ELASTICITY; PUBLIC POLICY;

ESCORTING CHILDREN; GROUP DECISION; GROUP DECISION-MAKING MODELS; INTRA-HOUSEHOLD INTERACTION; METROPOLITAN AREA; MODEL MISSPECIFICATION; SCHOOL TRIPS; TRAVEL BEHAVIORS;

STUDENTS;

BARGAINING; DECISION MAKING; METROPOLITAN AREA; STUDENT; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

MINNEAPOLIS; MINNESOTA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84988688693     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barker, J., ‘Manic Mums’ and ‘Distant Dads’? Gendered geographies of care and the journey to school. Health & Place 17:2 (2011), 413–421.
2. Bhat, C.R., Pendyala, R.M., Modeling intra-household interactions and group decision making. Transportation 32:5 (2005), 443–448.
3. Bradley, M., Vovsha, P., A model for joint choice of daily activity pattern types of household members. Transportation 32:5 (2005), 545–571.
4. Carver, A., Timperio, A., Crawford, D., Parental chauffeurs: what drives their transport choice?. J. Transp. Geogr. 26 (2013), 72–77.
5. Deka, D., An explanation of the relationship between adults’ work trip mode and children's school trip mode through the Heckman approach. J. Transp. Geogr. 31 (2013), 54–63.
6. DiGuiseppi, C., Roberts, I., Li, L., Allen, D., Determinants of car travel on daily journeys to school: cross sectional survey of primary school children. BMJ 316:7142 (1998), 1426–1428.
7. Elias, W., Katoshevski-Cavari, R., The role of socio-economic and environmental characteristics in school-commuting behavior: a comparative study of Jewish and Arab children in Israel. Transp. Policy 32 (2014), 79–87.
8. Ermagun, A., Samimi, A., How are children accompanied to school?. J. Urb. Plan. Dev., 2016, 04016002.
9. Ermagun, A., Levinson, D., Public transit, active travel, and the journey to school: a cross-nested logit analysis. Transportmetrica A: Transport Sci., 2016, 1–14, 10.1080/23249935.2016.1207723.
10. Ermagun, A., Samimi, A., Promoting active transportation modes in school trips. Transp. Policy 37 (2015), 203–211.
11. Ermagun, A., Rashidi, T.H., Lari, Z.A., Mode choice for school trips: long-term planning and impact of modal specification on policy assessments. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2513 (2015), 97–105.
12. Ermagun, A., Hossein Rashidi, T., Samimi, A., A joint model for mode choice and escort decisions of school trips. Transportmetrica A: Transport Sci. 11:3 (2015), 270–289.
13. Fortin, B., Lacroix, G., 1993. A test of the neoclassical and collective models of household labour supply.
14. Fyhri, A., Hjorthol, R., Mackett, R.L., Fotel, T.N., Kyttä, M., Children's active travel and independent mobility in four countries: development, social contributing trends and measures. Transp. Policy 18:5 (2011), 703–710.
15. Gliebe, J.P., Koppelman, F.S., Modeling household activity–travel interactions as parallel constrained choices. Transportation 32:5 (2005), 449–471.
16. Gupta, S., Vovsha, P., Livshits, V., Maneva, P., Jeon, K., Incorporation of escorting children to school in modeling individual daily activity patterns of household members. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2429 (2014), 20–29.
17. He, S.Y., Will you escort your child to school? The effect of spatial and temporal constraints of parental employment. Appl. Geogr. 42 (2013), 116–123.
18. Hillman, M., Adams, J., Whitelegg, J., 1990. One false move. Policy Studies Institute < www.psi.org.uk/publications/publication.asp>.
19. Ho, C., Mulley, C., Intra-household interactions in transport research: a review. Transport Rev. 35:1 (2015), 33–55.
20. Ho, C., Mulley, C., Intra-household interactions in tour-based mode choice: the role of social, temporal, spatial and resource constraints. Transp. Policy 38 (2015), 52–63.
21. Kyttä, M., The extent of children's independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 24:2 (2004), 179–198.
22. Lam, W.W., Loo, B.P., Determinants of children's independent mobility in Hong Kong. Asian Transport Stud. 3:2 (2014), 250–268.
23. Larsen, K., Gilliland, J., Hess, P., Tucker, P., Irwin, J., He, M., The influence of the physical environment and sociodemographic characteristics on children's mode of travel to and from school. Am. J. Public Health, 99(3), 2009, 520.
24. Lin, J.-J., Chang, H.-T., Built environment effects on children's school travel in Taipai: independence and travel mode. Urban Stud. 47:4 (2010), 867–889.
25. McDonald, N.C., Aalborg, A.E., Why parents drive children to school: implications for safe routes to school programs. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 75:3 (2009), 331–342.
26. McDonald, N.C., Household interactions and children's school travel: the effect of parental work patterns on walking and biking to school. J. Transp. Geogr. 16:5 (2008), 324–331.
27. McDonald, N.C., Travel and the social environment: evidence from Alameda County, California. Transport. Res. Part D: Transport Environ. 12:1 (2007), 53–63.
28. McMillan, T.E., The relative influence of urban form on a child's travel mode to school. Transport. Res. Part A: Pol. Pract. 41:1 (2007), 69–79.
29. Meister, K., Frick, M., Axhausen, K.W., A GA-based household scheduler. Transportation 32:5 (2005), 473–494.
30. Mitra, R., Faulkner, G.E., Buliung, R.N., Stone, M.R., 2014. Do parental perceptions of the neighbourhood environment influence children's independent mobility? Evidence from Toronto, Canada. Urban Studies, p. 0042098013519140.
31. Motte-Baumvol, B., Bonin, O., Belton-Chevallier, L., Who escort children: mum or dad? Exploring gender differences in escorting mobility among parisian dual-earner couples. Transportation, 2015, 1–19.
32. Samimi, A., Ermagun, A., Students’ tendency to walk to school: case study of Tehran. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 139:2 (2012), 144–152.
33. Schwanen, T., Ettema, D., Coping with unreliable transportation when collecting children: examining parents’ behavior with cumulative prospect theory. Transport. Res. Part A: Pol. Pract. 43:5 (2009), 511–525.
34. Srinivasan, S., Bhat, C.R., Modeling household interactions in daily in-home and out-of-home maintenance activity participation. Transportation 32:5 (2005), 523–544.
35. Susilo, Y.O., Liu, C., The influence of parents’ travel patterns, perceptions and residential self-selectivity to their children travel mode shares. Transportation, 2015, 1–22.
36. Susilo, Y.O., Waygood, E.O.D., A long term analysis of the mechanisms underlying children's activity-travel engagements in the Osaka metropolitan area. J. Transp. Geogr. 20:1 (2012), 41–50.
37. Timmermans, H.J., Zhang, J., Modeling household activity travel behavior: examples of state of the art modeling approaches and research agenda. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 43:2 (2009), 187–190.
38. Train, K.E., Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2009, Cambridge University Press.
39. Vovsha, P., Petersen, E., Escorting children to school: statistical analysis and applied modeling approach. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 1921 (2005), 131–140.
40. Yarlagadda, A.K., Srinivasan, S., Modeling children's school travel mode and parental escort decisions. Transportation 35:2 (2008), 201–218.
41. Zhang, J., Fujiwara, A., Representing household time allocation behavior by endogenously incorporating diverse intra-household interactions: a case study in the context of elderly couples. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 40:1 (2006), 54–74.
42. Zhang, J., Kuwano, M., Lee, B., Fujiwara, A., Modeling household discrete choice behavior incorporating heterogeneous group decision-making mechanisms. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 43:2 (2009), 230–250.
43. Zwerts, E., Allaert, G., Janssens, D., Wets, G., Witlox, F., How children view their travel behaviour: a case study from Flanders (Belgium). J. Transp. Geogr. 18:6 (2010), 702–710.