Sharing of clinical data in a maternity setting: How do paper hand-held records and electronic health records compare for completeness?

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Hawley, Glenda ^a   Jackson, Claire ^a   Hepworth, Julie ^c   Wilkinson, Shelley A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b MATER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Best practice variable; Electronic health record (EHR); General practitioner (GP); Maternity; Paper hand held record (PHR); Shared care

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; STANDARDS;

AUSTRALIA; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN;

EID: 84988674497     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0650-x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hamilton SG: Obstetric record card for use in general practice. Practitioner 1956, 176(1051):79-81. PubMed PMID: 13280547. Pubmed Central PMCID: Source: CLML. 5629:32688. English.
2. Hawley G, Janamian T, Jackson C, Wilkinson SA: In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014, 14(52):1-12
3. O'Sullivan TA, Billing NA, Stokes D: Just what the doctor ordered: Moving forward with electronic records (viewpoint). Nutr Diet 2011, 68:179-184.
4. National E-Health Transitory Authority (2011) NEHTA Strategic Plan Refresh 2011/2012. In: Government C, editor. p 1-112
5. Commonwealth of Australia: Building a 21st Century Primary Health Care System: Australia's First National Primary Health Care Strategy. Canberra: Department of Health and Aging; 2009.
6. Batterham R, Southern D, Appleby N, Elsworth G, Fabris S, Dunt D, Young D: Construction of a GP integration model. Soc Sci Med 2002, 54:1225-1241.
7. Homer C, Oats J, Hunt J, Clarke M: on behalf of the Expert Advisory Committe and Working Group for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women's Antenatal Care. Australia: Clinical Practice Guidelines-Antenatal Care-first trimester consultation draft. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Australia; 2011
8. Homer C, Oats J, Hunt J, Clarke M on behalf of the Expert Advisory Committee and Working Group for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women's Antenatal Care. Clinical Practice Guidelines Antenatal Care-Module 1. Australia: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2013
9. Mater Health Services and South East Alliance of General Practice. Mater Mothers' Hospital GP Maternity Shared Care Guideline. Mater Health Services. Available from http://materonline.org.au/whats-on/professionaldevelopment/gp-maternity-shared-care-alignment [cited 2014 June 10]
10. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): Quality standard for antenatal care [internet]. United Kingdom: Available from http://www.nice. org.uk/guidance/qs22 [cited 2014 June 04]
11. National Guidance on Collaborative Maternity Care (NHMRC). National Guidance on Collaborative Maternity Care. 2010; Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra: Available from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/-files-nhmrc/publications/attachments/CP124.pdf [cited 2014 June10]
12. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Antenatal Care [internet]. United Kingdom: Available from http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62/resources/guidance-antenatal-care-pdf [cited 2014 June 04]
13. Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) [internet]. ADIPS Consensus Guidelines For the Testing and Diagnosis Of Gestational Diabetes In Australia: Available from http://adips.org/information-for-health-careproviders-approved.asp [cited 2014 June 10]
14. New South Wales Department of Health [report]. The NSW Framework for Maternity Services. 2000; NSW Health, Sydney, Australia: Available from http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au/pubs/2000/pdf/maternity-framework.pdf [cited 2014 June 10].
15. Mikkelsen G, Aasly J: Concordance of information in parallel electronic and paper based patient records. Int J Med Inform 2001, 63(3):123-131. PubMed PMID: 11502428. Epub 2001/08/15. eng.
16. Williams D, Fuller J, Stevens L: Validity of routinely collected hospital admissions data on diabetes. Diabet Med 1989, 6(4):320-324.
17. Lau RWH, Williams L, Ware J, Brook R: Psychosocial problems in chronically ill children: physician concern, parent satisfaction and the validity of medical records. J Community Health 1982, 7(4):250-261.
18. Roshanov PS, Gerstein HC, Hunt DL, Sebaldt RJ, Haynes BR: Impact of a computerized system for evidence-based diabetes care on completeness of records: a before-after study. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 2012, 12:63. PubMed PMID: 22769425. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3461491. Epub 2012/07/10.eng.
19. Thoroddsen A, Sigurjonsdottir G, Ehnfors M, Ehrenberg A: Accuracy, completeness and comprehensiveness of information on pressure ulcers recorded in the patient record. Scand J Caring Sci 2012. PubMed PMID: 22630335. Epub 2012/05/29. Eng
20. Cleary R, Beard RW, Coles J, Devlin HB, Hopkins A, Roberts S, Schumacher D, Wickings HI: The quality of routinely collected maternity data. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 1994, 101(12):1042-1047.
21. Murray J, Saxena S, Modi N, Majeed A, Aylin P, Bottle A: Quality of routine hospital birth records and the feasibility of their use for creating birth cohorts. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012. PubMed PMID: 22967908. Epub 2012/09/13. Eng.
22. David R: The Quality and Completeness of Birthweight and Gestational Age Data in Computerized Birth Files. Am J Public Health 1980, 70(9):964-973.
23. Sullivan F, Wyatt JC: ABC of Health Informatics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.