Institutional Repositories, Open Access and Copyright: What Are the Practices and Implications?

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 279-294

  Dawson, Patricia H ^a   Yang, Sharon Q ^a  

^a RIDER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Copyright; Institutional Repositories; Open Access

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SERVICES; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES; NUMBER OF FACTORS; OPEN ACCESS; SCHOLARLY WORKS;

COPYRIGHTS;

LICENSING;

EID: 84988661169     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: 15411109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0194262X.2016.1224994     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. A.Abrizah, 2009. The cautious faculty:Their awareness and attitudes towards institutional repositories. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 14 (2):17–37.
2. ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee. 2015. Environmental scan 2015. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/EnvironmentalScan15.pdf.
3. N.Anderson, and G.Hodges. 2015. Repository registries:Characteristics, issues and futures. http://www.cendi.gov/publications/pub1_CENDI-2014-1.pdf.
4. A.Clobridge, 2014. All about open access repositories. Online Searcher 38 (5):38–41.
5. P.Davis, 2015. Citation boost or bad data? Academia.edu research under scrutiny. The Scholarly Kitchen. http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2015/05/18/.
6. Dutta, G., and Paul, D. 2014. Awareness on institutional repositories-related issues by faculty of University of Calcutta. DESIDOC. Journal of Library & Information Technology. 34 (4):293–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.34.5138.
7. J.Dryden, 2012. Cavalier or careful? How users approach the rights management practices of archival repositories. Journal of Archival Organization 10 (3/4):191–206. doi:10.1080/15332748.2012.787847.
8. J.Dryden, 2014. Just let it go? Controlling reuse of online holdings. Archivaria 77:43–71.
9. G.Dutta, and D.Paul. 2014. Awareness on institutional repositories-related issues by faculty of university of Calcutta. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 34 (4):293–97. doi:10.14429/djlit.
10. Fondren Library. 2015. Rice author open access fees. http://libguides.rice.edu/AuthorFees.
11. V.-E.García-Vera, R.Roig-Vila, P.G.Ferrández, and P.Marti. 2015. How can directories of open access repositories improve the reuse of learning objects in building engineering? International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning 25 (3):274–92. doi:10.1504/IJCEELL.2015.072664.
12. D.R.Hansen, 2012. Understanding and making use of academic authors’ open access rights. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 1 (2):1–10. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1050.
13. Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. 2015. Open access policies. https://osc.hul.harvard.edu/policies/.
14. K.Jihyun, 2011. Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. Journal of Academic Librarianship 37 (3):246–54. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017.
15. S.Konkiel, and D.Scherer. 2013. New opportunities for repositories in the age of altmetrics. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 39 (4):22–26. doi:10.1002/bult.2013.1720390408.
16. A.Koulouris, and S.Kapidakis. 2005. Access and reproduction policies of university digital collections. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 37 (1):25–33. doi:10.1177/0961000605052157.
17. M.Laakso, and B.-C.Bjork. 2012. Anatomy of open access publishing:A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine 10 (125):1–9. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-124.
18. R.Mounce, 2013. Open access and altmetrics:Distinct but complementary. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology 39 (4):14–17. doi:10.1002/bult.2013.1720390406.
19. Neugebauer, T., and Murray, A. 2013. The critical role of institutional services in open access advocacy. International Journal of Digital Curation. 8 (1):84–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.238.
20. Y.Niyazov, C.Vogel, R.Price, B.Lund, D.Judd, A.Akil, J.Schwartzman, and M.Shron. 2015. Open access meets discoverability:Citations to articles posted to Academia.edu. PLos ONE 11(2):e0148257. https://www.academia.edu/12297791/.
21. OpenDOAR. 2014. Policies tool. http://www.opendoar.org/tools/en/policies.php.
22. S.Peroni, A.Dutton, T.Gray, and D.Shotton. 2015. Setting our bibliographic references free:Towards open citation data. Records Management Journal 71 (2):253–77.
23. Pickett, K. M., and Knapp, M. M. 2014. A global snapshot of the state of digital collections in the health sciences, 2013. Journal of the Medical Library Association 102 (2):121–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.013.
24. Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR). 2016. About the registry. http://roar.eprints.org/information.html.
25. M.Schlosser, 2009. Unless otherwise indicated:A survey of copyright statements on digital library collections. College and Research Libraries 70 (4):371–85. doi:10.5860/crl.70.4.371.
26. Schimmer, R., Geschuhn, K. K., and Vogler, A. 2015. Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access. doi:10.17617/1.3. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0026-C274-7.
27. P.Shukla, and A.M.Khan. 2014. Implications of institutional repositories on contributors’ professional and publishing practices:A survey. International Information & Library Review 46 (3/4):125–36. doi:10.1080/10572317.2014.970061.
28. J.Willinsky, 2010. Open access and academic reputation. Annals of Library and Information Studies 57:296–302. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/10242/4/ALIS%2057%283%29%20296-302.pdf.
29. Z.L.Yang, and Y.Li. 2015. University faculty awareness and attitudes towards open access publishing and the institutional repository:A case study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 3 (1):eP1210. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1210.