The changing uses of accuracy in science communication

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 760-774

  Hansen, Anders ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

accuracy; balance; impartiality; media and science; media representations; public understanding of science; science communication; science journalism

Indexed keywords

BLOGGING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MASS MEDIUM; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLISHING; SCIENCE; SOCIAL MEDIA; STANDARDS;

BLOGGING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; JOURNALISM; MASS MEDIA; PUBLIC OPINION; SCIENCE; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84988640239     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662516636303     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Allan S, Ewart J, (2015) Citizen science/citizen journalism: New forms of environmental reporting. In: Hansen A, Cox R, (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. London; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 186–196.
2. BBC Trust (2011) Review of impartiality and accuracy of the BBC’s coverage of science. With an independent assessment by Professor Steve Jones and content research from Imperial College London, July. London: BBC Trust.
3. Beder S, (2002) Global Spin: The Corporate Assault on Environmentalism, Revised edn. Totnes: Green Books.
4. Beder S, (2004) Moulding and manipulating the news. In: White R, (ed.) Controversies in Environmental Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 204–220.
5. Borman SC, (1978) Communication accuracy in magazine science reporting. Journalism Quarterly 55: 345–346.
6. Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM, (2004) Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 14(2): 125–136.
7. Boykoff MT, McNatt MM, Goodman MK, (2015) Communicating in the anthropocene: The cultural politics of climate change news coverage around the world. In: Hansen A, Cox R, (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. London; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 221–231.
8. Brechman JM, Lee CJ, Cappella JN, (2009) Lost in translation? A comparison of cancer-genetics reporting in the press release and its subsequent coverage in the press. Science Communication 30(4): 453–474.
9. Brechman JM, Lee CJ, Cappella JN, (2011) Distorting genetic research about cancer: From bench science to press release to published news. Journal of Communication 61(3): 496–513.
10. Charnley MV, (1936) Preliminary notes on a study of newspaper accuracy. Journalism Quarterly 13: 394–401.
11. Corbett JB, Durfee JL, (2004) Testing public (Un) certainty of science – Media representations of global warming. Science Communication 26(2): 129–151.
12. Cronholm M, Sandell R, (1981) Scientific-information – A review of research. Journal of Communication 31(2): 85–96.
13. Dearing JW, (1995) Newspaper coverage of maverick science: Creating controversy through balancing. Public Understanding of Science 4: 341–361.
14. de Semir V, Ribas C, Revuelta G, (1998) Press releases of science journal articles and subsequent newspaper stories on the same topic. Journal of the American Medical Association 280(3): 294–295.
15. Dixon GN, Clarke CE, (2013) Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication 35(3): 358–382.
16. Dornan C, (1990) Some problems in conceptualizing the issue of ‘science and the media’. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7(1): 48–71.
17. Dunwoody S, (1979) News-gathering behaviors of specialty reporters: A two-level comparison of mass media decision-making. Newspaper Research Journal 1(1): 29–41.
18. Dunwoody S, (2008) Science journalism. In: Bucchi M, Trench B, (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge, pp. 15–26.
19. Dunwoody S, (2014) Science journalism: Prospects in the digital age. In: Bucchi M, Trench B, (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, pp. 27–39.
20. Dunwoody S, Peters HP, (1992) Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks: A survey of research in the United States and Germany. Public Understanding of Science 1(2): 199–230.
21. Dunwoody S, Ryan M, (1983) Public information persons as mediators between scientists and science writers. Journalism Quarterly 60: 647–656.
22. Dunwoody S, Stocking SH, (1985) Social scientists and journalists: Confronting the stereotypes. In: Rubinstein E, Brown J, (eds) The Media, Social Science, and Social Policy for Children. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, pp. 167–187.
23. Endreny PM, (1985) News values and science values: The editor’s role in shaping news about the social sciences. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University, New York, NY.
24. Esser F, Hanitzsch T, (2012) On the why and how of comparative inquiry in communication studies. In: Esser F, Hanitzsch T, (eds) The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. London: Routledge, pp. 3–23.
25. Friedman SM, (1986) The journalist’s world. In: Friedman SM, Dunwoody S, Rogers CL, (eds) Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News. New York, NY: The Free Press, pp. 17–41.
26. Friedman SM, (2011) Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima: An analysis of traditional and new media coverage of nuclear accidents and radiation. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67(5): 55–65.
27. Friedman SM, (2015) The changing face of environmental journalism in the United States. In: Hansen A, Cox R, (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. London; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 144–157.
28. Friedman SM, Dunwoody S, Rogers CL, (eds) (1999) Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Gieryn TF, (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30. Gregory J, Miller S, (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
31. Hallin DC, Briggs CL, (2015) Transcending the medical/media opposition in research on news coverage of health and medicine. Media Culture & Society 37(1): 85–100.
32. Hansen A, (1994) Journalistic practices and science reporting in the British press. Public Understanding of Science 3(2): 111–134.
33. Hansen A, (2009) Science, communication and media. In: Holliman R, Whitelegg E, Scanlon E, Smidt S, Thomas J, (eds) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media. Milton Keynes: Oxford University Press and The Open University, pp. 105–127.
34. Hansen A, (2015) News coverage of the environment: A longitudinal perspective. In: Hansen A, Cox R, (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 209–220.
35. Hansen A, Dickinson R, (1992) Science coverage in the British mass media: Media output and source input. Communications: The European Journal of Communication 17(3): 365–377.
36. Hilgartner S, (1990) The dominant view of popularization – Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science 20(3): 519–539.
37. Hilgartner S, Bosk CL, (1988) The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology 94(1): 53–78.
38. Ingram D, (2000) Green Screen: Environmentalism and Hollywood Cinema. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
39. Jensen JD, Krakow M, John KK, Liu M, (2013) Against conventional wisdom: When the public, the media, and medical practice collide. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 13: S4.
40. Kirby DA, (2014) Science and technology in film: Themes and representations. In: Bucchi M, Trench B, (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 97–112.
41. Leiserowitz AA, (2005) American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis 25: 1433–1442.
42. Loosen W, Schmidt J-H, (2012) Re-discovering the audience. Information, Communication & Society 15(6): 867–887.
43. Maier SR, (2005) Accuracy matters: A cross-market assessment of newspaper error and credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 82(3): 533–551.
44. Mellor F, (2009) The politics of accuracy in judging global warming films. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 3(2): 134–150.
45. Miller D, Dinan W, (2015) Resisting meaningful action on climate change: Think tanks, ‘merchants of doubt’ and the ‘corporate capture’ of sustainable development. In: Hansen A, Cox R, (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. London; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 86–99.
46. Moore B, Singletary M, (1985) Scientific sources’ perceptions of network news accuracy. Journalism Quarterly 62(4): 816–823.
47. Morgan M, Shanahan J, (2010) The state of cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 54(2): 337–355.
48. Nelkin D, (1987) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
49. Oreskes N, Conway EM, (2010) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. London: Bloomsbury.
50. Painter J, (2011) Poles Apart: The International Reporting of Climate Scepticism. Oxford: University of Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
51. Painter J, (2013) Climate Change in the Media: Reporting Risk and Uncertainty. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
52. Painter J, Ashe T, (2012) Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007–2010. Environmental Research Letters 7: 1–8.
53. Philo G, Happer C, (2013) Communicating Climate Change and Energy Security: New Methods in Understanding Audiences. London: Routledge.
54. Plein LC, (1991) Popularising biotechnology: The influence of issue definition. Science, Technology, & Human Values 16(4): 474–490.
55. Priest S, (2015) Mapping media’s role in environmental thought and action. In: Hansen A, Cox R, (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. London; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 301–311.
56. Rogers CL, (1986) The practitioner in the middle. In: Friedman SM, Dunwoody S, Rogers CL, (eds) Scientists and Journalists. London; New York, NY: The Free Press, pp. 42–54.
57. Saguy AC, Almeling R, (2008) Fat in the fire? Science, the news media, and the ‘Obesity epidemic’. Sociological Forum 23(1): 53–83.
58. Salomone KL, Greenberg MR, Sandman PM, Sachsman DB, (1990) A question of quality: How journalists and news sources evaluate coverage of environmental risk. Journal of Communication 40(4): 117–130.
59. Seale C, (2002) Media and Health. London: SAGE.
60. Seale C, (2010) How the mass media report social statistics: A case study concerning research on end-of-life decisions. Social Science & Medicine 71(5): 861–868.
61. Shehata A, Hopmann DN, (2012) Framing climate change: A study of US and Swedish press coverage of global warming. Journalism Studies 13(2): 175–192.
62. Singer E, (1990) A question of accuracy: How journalists and scientists report research on hazards. Journal of Communication 40(4): 102–116.
63. Singletary M, (1980) Accuracy in News Reporting: A Review of the Research. Washington, DC: American Newspaper Publishers Association, p. 9.
64. Stocking SH, (1999) How journalists deal with scientific uncertainty. In: Friedman SM, Dunwoody S, Rogers CL, (eds) Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 23–42.
65. Tankard JW, Ryan M, (1974) News source perceptions of accuracy of science coverage. Journalism Quarterly 51: 219–225.
66. Tannenbaum PH, (1963) Communication of science information. Science 140: 579–583.
67. The Royal Society (1985) Public Understanding of Science: Report of a Royal Society Ad Hoc Group Endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. London: The Royal Society.
68. Tichenor PJ, Olien CN, Harrison A, Donohue GA, (1970) Mass communication systems and communication accuracy in science news reporting. Journalism Quarterly 47(4): 673–683.
69. Wade S, Schramm W, (1969) The mass media as sources of public affairs, science, and health knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 33: 197–209.
70. Weigold MF, (2001) Communicating science – A review of the literature. Science Communication 23(2): 164–193.
71. Williams A, (2015) Environmental news journalism, public relations and news sources. In: Hansen A, Cox R, (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. London; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 197–205.
72. Wilson KM, (2000) Drought, debate, and uncertainty: Measuring reporters’ knowledge and ignorance about climate change. Public Understanding of Science 9(1): 1–13.