Multi-period energy planning model under uncertainty in market prices and demands of energy resources: A case study of Korea power system

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Volumn 114, Issue , 2016, Pages 341-358

  Choi, Go Bong ^a   Lee, Seok Goo ^a   Lee, Jong Min ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Disposal of waste; Energy planning; Learning curve; Mixed integer linear programming; Price and demand forecasting

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; COSTS; ENERGY RESOURCES; FORECASTING; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

DEMAND FORECASTING; ENERGY PLANNING; LEARNING CURVES; MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORKS; MIXED INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAM; MIXED INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE; WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES;

WASTE DISPOSAL;

EID: 84988600957     PISSN: 02638762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.08.033     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. 2 capture from power plants: part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 1:1 (2007), 37–46.
2. Alexandre Kossoy, P.G., State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2012. Tech. Rep. 2012, Carbon Finance.
3. Amirnekooei, K., Ardehali, M., Sadri, A., Integrated resource planning for Iran: development of reference energy system, forecast, and long-term energy-environment plan. Energy 46:1 (2012), 374–385.
4. Ball, C.A., Torous, W.N., A simplified jump process for common stock returns. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 18:1 (1983), 53–65.
5. Bunn, M., Fetter, S., Holdren, J.P., Van Der Zwaan, B., The Economics of Reprocessing vs. Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel. 2003, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
6. Cheng, R., Xu, Z., Liu, P., Wang, Z., Li, Z., Jones, I., A multi-region optimization planning model for China's power sector. Appl. Energy 137 (2015), 413–426.
7. Cho, K.-S., Chang-Ho, R., Assessment technique of capacity credit for renewable energy sources. Assessment technique of capacity credit for renewable energy sources Proceeding of the KIEE Annual Summer Conference, 2006.
8. Cong, R.-G., An optimization model for renewable energy generation and its application in China: a perspective of maximum utilization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 17 (2013), 94–103.
9. Deng, J.-L., Introduction to grey system theory. J. Grey Syst. 1:1 (1989), 1–24.
10. Fishbone, L.G., Abilock, H., MARKAL, a linear-programming model for energy-systems analysis – technical description of the BNL version. Int. J. Energy Res. 5:4 (1981), 353–375.
11. Green Energy Technology Insight. Tech. Rep. 01. 2013, Korea Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning.
12. Ghoshray, A., Johnson, B., Trends in world energy prices. Energy Econ. 32:5 (2010), 1147–1156.
13. Guo, Z., Song, X., Ye, J., A Verhulst model on time series error corrected for port throughput forecasting. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 6 (2005), 881–891.
14. Hearing, J.O., Interim Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Tech. Rep. 1994.
15. Henning, H.-M., Palzer, A., A comprehensive model for the German electricity and heat sector in a future energy system with a dominant contribution from renewable energy technologies – part I: methodology. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30 (2014), 1003–1018.
16. Hobbs, B.F., Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 83:1 (1995), 1–20.
17. Hong, S., Bradshaw, C.J., Brook, B.W., Evaluating options for sustainable energy mixes in South Korea using scenario analysis. Energy 52 (2013), 237–244.
18. 2 transport strategy for the offshore CCS in Korea. Energy Procedia 37 (2013), 3242–3249.
19. K.E.E. Institute, Korea Energy Statistics Information System. 2015 online http://www.kesis.net/flexapp/KesisFlexApp.jsp (accessed 21.12.15.
20. K.E.M. Corporation, Korea New Renewable Energy Center. 2015 online http://www.knrec.or.kr/knrec/index.asp (accessed 21.12.15).
21. K.N.O. Corporation, Petroleum Stockpilling. 2015 online http://www.knoc.co.kr/ (accessed 21.12.15).
22. K.P. Exchange, The 3rd Basic Plan for Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand. 2006.
23. K.P. Exchange, Electric Power Statistics Information System. 2015 online https://epsis.kpx.or.kr/ (accessed 21.12.15).
24. Kayacan, E., Ulutas, B., Kaynak, O., Grey system theory-based models in time series prediction. Expert Syst. Appl. 37:2 (2010), 1784–1789.
25. Kim, S., Koo, J., Lee, C.J., Yoon, E.S., Optimization of Korean energy planning for sustainability considering uncertainties in learning rates and external factors. Energy 44:1 (2012), 126–134.
26. Kinnaman, T.C., The economic impact of shale gas extraction: a review of existing studies. Ecol. Econ. 70:7 (2011), 1243–1249.
27. Koltsaklis, N.E., Georgiadis, M.C., A multi-period, multi-regional generation expansion planning model incorporating unit commitment constraints. Appl. Energy 158 (2015), 310–331.
28. Koltsaklis, N.E., Dagoumas, A.S., Kopanos, G.M., Pistikopoulos, E.N., Georgiadis, M.C., A spatial multi-period long-term energy planning model: a case study of the Greek power system. Appl. Energy 115 (2014), 456–482.
29. Koltsaklis, N.E., Liu, P., Georgiadis, M.C., An integrated stochastic multi-regional long-term energy planning model incorporating autonomous power systems and demand response. Energy 82 (2015), 865–888.
30. Koo, J., Park, K., Shin, D., Yoon, E.S., Economic evaluation of renewable energy systems under varying scenarios and its implications to Korea's renewable energy plan. Appl. Energy 88:6 (2011), 2254–2260.
31. Koo, J., Han, K., Yoon, E.S., Integration of CCS, emissions trading and volatilities of fuel prices into sustainable energy planning, and its robust optimization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15:1 (2011), 665–672.
32. Kydes, A.S., Rabinowitz, J., Overview and special features of the time-stepped energy system optimization model (TESOM). Resour. Energy 3:1 (1981), 65–92.
33. Liu, L., Wan, J., A study of Shanghai fuel oil futures price volatility based on high frequency data: long-range dependence, modeling and forecasting. Econ. Model. 29:6 (2012), 2245–2253.
34. McDonald, A., Schrattenholzer, L., Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29:4 (2001), 255–261.
35. McDowall, W., Anandarajah, G., Dodds, P.E., Tomei, J., Implications of sustainability constraints on UK bioenergy development: assessing optimistic and precautionary approaches with UK MARKAL. Energy Policy 47 (2012), 424–436.
36. Metz, B., Davidson, O., De Coninck, H., Loos, M., Meyer, L., et al. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. 2005.
37. 2 emission consideration. J. Environ. Manag., 2010, 1063–1070.
38. 2 reduction target. Renew. Energy 35:11 (2010), 2562–2570.
39. Paltsev, S., Jacoby, H.D., Reilly, J.M., Ejaz, Q.J., Morris, J., O'Sullivan, F., Rausch, S., Winchester, N., Kragha, O., The future of US natural gas production, use, and trade. Energy Policy 39:9 (2011), 5309–5321.
40. Park, N.-B., Yun, S.-J., Jeon, E.-C., An analysis of long-term scenarios for the transition to renewable energy in the Korean electricity sector. Energy Policy 52 (2013), 288–296.
41. Pindyck, R.S., The long-run evolution of energy prices. Energy J., 1999, 1–27.
42. Presno, M.J., Landajo, M., Fernández, P., Non-renewable resource prices: a robust evaluation from the stationarity perspective. Resour. Energy Econ. 36:2 (2014), 394–416.
43. 2 capture and storage. Energy Policy 35:9 (2007), 4444–4454.
44. Söderholm, P., Sundqvist, T., Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies. Renew. Energy 32:15 (2007), 2559–2578.
45. Sampaio, H.C., Dias, R.A., Balestieri, J.A.P., Sustainable urban energy planning: the case study of a tropical city. Appl. Energy 104 (2013), 924–935.
46. Sarica, K., Tyner, W.E., Analysis of US renewable fuels policies using a modified MARKAL model. Renew. Energy 50 (2013), 701–709.
47. Shafiee, S., Topal, E., A long-term view of worldwide fossil fuel prices. Appl. Energy 87:3 (2010), 988–1000.
48. Suganthi, L., Samuel, A.A., Energy models for demand forecasting – a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16:2 (2012), 1223–1240.
49. Thangavelu, S.R., Khambadkone, A.M., Karimi, I.A., Long-term optimal energy mix planning towards high energy security and low GHG emission. Appl. Energy 154 (2015), 959–969.
50. U.E.I. Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2013. 2013.
51. U.E.I. Administration, Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2014. 2014.
52. Viana, A., Pedroso, J.P., A new MILP-based approach for unit commitment in power production planning. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 44:1 (2013), 997–1005.
53. Walmsley, M.R., Walmsley, T.G., Atkins, M.J., Achieving 33% renewable electricity generation by 2020 in California. Energy, 2015.
54. Winkler, H., Hughes, A., Haw, M., Technology learning for renewable energy: implications for South Africa's long-term mitigation scenarios. Energy Policy 37:11 (2009), 4987–4996.
55. Yongson, S., Sunhee, B., Bongwhan, H., Jusung, L., Kwangin, K., Current situation and utilization-rate as both solar and wind power plant in Korea. Proceeding of the KIEE Annual Fall Conference, 2011.
56. Zahid, U., Lee, U., An, J., Lim, Y., Han, C., Economic analysis for the transport and storage of captured carbon dioxide in South Korea. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 33:3 (2014), 978–992.
57. Zhang, X., Ruoshui, W., Molin, H., Martinot, E., A study of the role played by renewable energies in China's sustainable energy supply. Energy 35:11 (2010), 4392–4399.
58. Zhang, D., Liu, P., Ma, L., Zheng, L., A multi-period optimization model for planning of China's power sector with consideration of carbon dioxide mitigation the importance of continuous and stable carbon mitigation policy. Energy Policy 58 (2013), 319–328.