Optimization of Korean energy planning for sustainability considering uncertainties in learning rates and external factors

Energy

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 126-134

  Kim, Seunghyok ^a   Koo, Jamin ^a   Lee, Chang Jun ^b   Yoon, En Sup ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Samsung Corning Precision Materials Co Ltd ^*  (South Korea)

Author keywords

Energy planning; Learning rate; Optimization; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; COSTS; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

COMPLEX TASK; DOMESTIC DEMAND; ENERGY PLANNING; ENERGY SITUATION; ENERGY SYSTEMS; EXTERNAL COSTS; EXTERNAL FACTORS; HIGH COSTS; LEARNING RATES; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; PRODUCTION COST; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS; SOUTH KOREA; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY MANAGEMENT; TOTAL COSTS;

INVESTMENTS;

DECADAL VARIATION; DIFFUSION; ENERGY PLANNING; FUTURE PROSPECT; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 84864353671     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.062     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Lior N. Sustainable energy development: the present (2009) situation and possible paths to the future. Energy 2010, 35:3976-3994.
2. Koo J., Han K., Yoon E.S. Integration of CCS, emissions trading and volatilities of fuel prices into sustainable energy planning, and its robust optimization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011, 15:665-672.
3. Weigt H. Germany's wind energy: the potential for fossil capacity replacement and cost saving. Applied Energy 2009, 86:1857-1863.
4. Banos R., Manzano-Agugliaro F., Montoya F.G., Gil C., Alcayde A., Gomez J. Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011, 15:1753-1766.
5. Korea Energy Management Corporation The policy of renewable energy in Korea. Republic of Korea 2010, [Technical report].
6. Lund H. Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy 2007, 32:912-919.
7. Cormio C., Dicorato M., Minoia A., Trovato M. A regional energy planning methodology including renewable energy sources and environmental constraints. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2003, 7:99-130.
8. Pinto T., Morais H., Oliveira P., Vale Z., Praca I., Ramos C. A new approach for multi-agent coalition formation and management in the scope of electricity markets. Energy 2011, 36:5004-5015.
9. Kydes A., Rabinowitz J. Overview and special features of the time-stepped energy system optimization model. Resources and Energy 1981, 3:65-92.
10. Kanudia A., Loulou R. Robust responses to climate change via stochastic MARKAL: the case of Quebec. European Journal of Operational Research 1998, 106:15-30.
11. Hill D., Sailor V., Fishbone L., Future U.S. Energy technologies: cost and oil-import tradeoffs. Energy 1981, 6:1405-1431.
12. Fishbone L., Abilock H. Markal, a linear-programming model for energy systems analysis: technical description of the BNL version. International Journal of Energy Research 1981, 5:353-375.
13. Cai Y.P., Huang G.H., Yang Z.F., Lin Q.G., Tan Q. Community-scale renewable energy systems planning under uncertainty-an interval chance-constrained programming approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009, 13:721-735.
14. Krukanont P., Tezuka T. Implications of capacity expansion under uncertainty and value of information: the near-term energy planning of Japan. Energy 2007, 32:1809-1824.
15. Viebahn P., Nitsch J., Fischedick M., Esken A., Schuwer D., Supersberger N., et al. Comparison of carbon capture and storage with renewable energy technologies regarding structural, economic, and ecological aspects in Germany. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:121-133.
16. Chatzimouratidis A.I., Pilavachi P.A. Technical, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy 2009, 37:778-787.
17. Kaya T., Kahraman C. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 2010, 35:2517-2527.
18. Krey V., Martinsen D., Wagner H. Effects of stochastic energy prices on long-term energy-economic scenarios. Energy 2007, 32:2340-2349.
19. Streimikiene D. Comparative assessment of future power generation technologies based on carbon price development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010, 14:1283-1292.
20. Nguyen H.T., Nabney I.T. Short-term electricity demand and gas price forecasts using wavelet transforms and adaptive models. Energy 2010, 35:3674-3685.
21. Brandt A.R., Plevin R.J., Farrell A.E. Dynamics of the oil transition: modeling capacity, depletion, and emissions. Energy 2010, 35:2852-2860.
22. Kobos P., Erikson J., Drennen T. Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for US renewable energy policy. Energy Policy 2006, 34:1645-1658.
23. Ferioli F., Schoots K., van der Zwaan B. Use and limitations of learning curves for energy technology policy: a component-learning hypothesis. Energy Policy 2009, 37:2525-2535.
24. Xie Y.L., Li Y.P., Huang G.H., Li Y.F. An interval fixed-mix stochastic programming method for greenhouse gas mitigation in energy systems under uncertainty. Energy 2010, 35:4627-4644.
25. Koo J., Park K., Shin D., Yoon E.S. Economic evaluation of renewable energy systems under varying scenarios and its implications to Korea's renewable energy plan. Applied Energy 2011, 88:2254-2260.
26. Douglas J.M. Conceptual design of chemical processes 1988.
27. Soderholm P., Sundqvist T. Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies. Renewable Energy 2007, 32:2559-2578.
28. McDonald A., Schrattenholzer L. Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 2001, 29:255-261.
29. Rout U.K., Blesl M., Fahl U., Remme U., Voß A. Uncertainty in the learning rates of energy technologies: an experiment in a global multi-regional energy system model. Energy Policy 2009, 37:4927-4942.
30. Rubin E.S., Taylor M.R., Yeh S., Hounshell D.A. Learning curves for environmental technology and their importance for climate policy analysis. Energy 2004, 29:1551-1559.
31. Yeh S., Rubin E.S. A centurial history of technological change and learning curves for pulverized coal-fired utility boilers. Energy 2007, 32:1996-2005.
32. Winkler H., Hughes A., Haw M. Technology learning for renewable energy: implications for South Africa's long-term mitigation scenarios. Energy Policy 2009, 37:4987-4996.
33. Wang J., Zhou Z., Botterud A. An evolutionary game approach to analyzing bidding strategies in electricity markets with elastic demand. Energy 2011, 36:3459-3467.
34. U.S.Energy Information Administration Annual energy outlook 2011, U.S. Department of Energy. United States of America; 2010.
35. Korea Energy Management Corporation Statistics on production and distribution of renewable energy in Korea during the year 2008. Republic of Korea 2009.
36. Entriken R. Decomposition and importance sampling for stochastic linear models. Energy 1990, 15:645-659.
37. Spinney P.J., Watkins G.C. Monte Carlo simulation techniques and electric utility resource decisions. Energy Policy 1996, 24:155-163.
38. Yu S., Tao J. Energy efficiency assessment by life cycle simulation of cassava-based fuel ethanol for automotive use in Chinese Guangxi context. Energy 2009, 34:22-31.
39. National Energy Committee of Korea Korean national energy plan, 2008-2030. national energy committee of Korea. Republic of Korea 2008.
40. Kim S.H., Kim T.H., Kim Y., Na I.G. Korean energy demand in the new millennium: outlook and policy implications, 2000-2005. Energy Policy 2001, 29:899-910.
41. Korea Electricity Power Corporation. Statistics of electric power in Korea, Republic of Korea; 2009. [accessed 2.12.11]. http://www.kepco.co.kr.
42. 2 emissions pinch analysis (CEPA) to the Irish electricity generation sector. Energy 2008, 33:1498-1507.
43. Tan R.R., Foo D.C.Y. Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning. Energy 2007, 32:1422-1429.
44. Foo D.C.Y., Tan R.R., Ng D.K.S. Carbon and footprint-constrained energy planning using cascade analysis technique. Energy 2008, 33:1480-1488.
45. Tan R.R., Ng D.K.S., Foo D.C.Y. Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained planning for sustainable power generation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2009, 17:940-944.
46. IEA World energy outlook 2010 2010, France.
47. IEA World energy outlook 2011 2011, France.
48. Korea Energy Management Corporation Statistics on the supply of energy by renewable energy sources during the year 2008 2009.
49. Ma T., Nakamori Y. Modeling technological change in energy systems - from optimization to agent-based modeling. Energy 2009, 34:873-879.
50. Korea Energy Management Corporation Green policies for energy and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions 2010.