New insights from molecular characterization of the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Brazil;Novos pontos de vista sobre a caracterização molecular em carrapatos Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, no Brasil

Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 317-326

  Csordas, Bárbara Guimarães ^a   Garcia, Marcos Valério ^b,e   Cunha, Rodrigo Casquero ^c   Giachetto, Poliana Fernanda ^d   Blecha, Isabella Maiumi Zaidan ^a   Andreotti, Renato ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MATO GROSSO DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^d EMBRAPA INFORMÁTICA AGROPECUÁRIA   (Brazil)

^e Bolsista DCR Fundect MS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Brazil; Cattle tick; COX I gene; ITS 2 gene; Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; BRAZIL; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; RHIPICEPHALUS;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BRAZIL; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; PHYLOGENY; RHIPICEPHALUS;

EID: 84988598786     PISSN: 0103846X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1984-29612016053     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25(17): 3389-3402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. PMid:9254694.
2. Andreotti R, Guerrero FD, Soares MA, Barros JC, Miller RJ, Léon AP. Acaricide resistance of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2011; 20(2): 127-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612011000200007. PMid:21722487.
3. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16(1): 37-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036. PMid:10331250.
4. Barré N, Uilenberg G. Spread of parasites transported with their hosts: case study of two species of cattle tick. Rev Sci Tech 2010; 29(1): 149-160, 135-147. PMid:20617654.
5. Barros-Battesti DM, Arzua M, Bechara GH. Carrapatos de importância médico-veterinária da região neotropical: Um guia ilustrado para identificação de espécies. São Paulo: Instituto Butantan, 2006. 223 p.
6. Barrett RDH, Hebert PDN. Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Can J Zool 2005; 83(3): 481-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z05-024.
7. Busch JD, Stone NE, Nottingham R, Araya-Anchetta A, Lewis J, Hochhalter C, et al. Widespread movement of invasive cattle fever ticks (Rhipicephalus microplus) in southern Texas leads to shared local infestations on cattle and deer. Parasit Vectors 2014; 7(1): 188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-188. PMid:24742041.
8. Burger TD, Shao R, Barker SC. Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial genome sequences indicates that the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, contains a cryptic species. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2014; 76: 241-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.03.017. PMid:24685498.
9. Campbell BC, Steffen-Campbell JD, Werren JH. Phylogeny of the Nasonia species complex (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) inferred from an internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) and 28S rDNA sequences. Insect Mol Biol 1993; 2(4): 225-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.1994.tb00142.x. PMid:9087560.
10. Cruickshank RH. Molecular markers for the phylogenetics of mites and ticks. Syst Appl Acarol 2002; 7(1): 3-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.11158/saa.7.1.1.
11. Dantas-Torres F. Climate change, biodiversity, ticks and tick-borne diseases: the butterfly effect. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2015; 4(3): 452-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.07.001. PMid:26835253.
12. de la Fuente J, Estrada-Peña A, Venzal JM, Kocan KM, Sonenshine DE. Overview: ticks as vectors of pathogens that cause disease in humans and animals. Front Biosci 2008; 13(13): 6938-6946. http://dx.doi.org/10.2741/3200. PMid:18508706.
13. Estrada-Peña A, Bouattour A, Camicas JL, Guglielmone A, Horak I, Jongejan F, et al. The known distribution and ecological preferences of the tick subgenus Boophilus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Africa and Latin America. Exp Appl Acarol 2006; 38(2-3): 219-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-006-0003-5. PMid:16596355.
14. Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 1998; 8(3): 186-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.8.3.186. PMid:9521922.
15. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998; 8(3): 175-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.8.3.175. PMid:9521921.
16. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 2010; 10(3): 564-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x. PMid:21565059.
17. Grisi L, Leite RC, Martins JR, Barros AT, Andreotti R, Cançado PH, et al. Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2014; 23(2): 150-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612014042. PMid:25054492.
18. Guerrero FD, Andreotti R, Bendele KG, Cunha RC, Miller RJ, Yeater K, et al. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus aquaporin as an effective vaccine antigen to protect against cattle tick infestations. Parasit Vectors 2014; 7: 475. PMid:25306139.
19. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 2003; 270(1512): 313-321.
20. Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2004; 2(10): e312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312. PMid:15455034.
21. Hoogstral H. Theobald Smith: his scientific work and impact. Bull Entomol Soc Am 1986; 32(1): 22-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/besa/32.1.22.
22. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MRBAYES: bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001; 17(8): 754-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. PMid:11524383.
23. Ibelli AM, Ribeiro AR, Giglioti R, Regitano LC, Alencar MM, Chagas ACS, et al. Resistance of cattle of various genetic groups to the tick Rhipicephalus microplus and the relationship with coat traits. Vet Parasitol 2012; 186(3-4): 425-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.019. PMid:22115946.
24. Kanduma EG, Mwacharo JM, Sunter JD, Nzuki I, Mwaura S, Kinyanjui PW, et al. Micro-and minisatellite-expressed sequence tag (EST) markers discriminate between populations of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2012; 3(3): 128-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.05.001. PMid:22789728.
25. Labruna MB, Naranjo V, Mangold AJ, Thompson C, Estrada-Peña A, Guglielmone AA, et al. Allopatric speciation in ticks: genetic and reproductive divergence between geographic strains of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. BMC Evol Biol 2009; 9(1): 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-46. PMid:19243585.
26. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009; 25(11): 1451-1452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187. PMid:19346325.
27. Low VL, Tay ST, Kho KL, Koh FX, Tan TK, Lim YAL, et al. Molecular characterisation of the tick Rhipicephalus microplus in Malaysia: new insights into the cryptic diversity and distinct genetic assemblages throughout the world. Parasit Vectors 2015; 8(1): 341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0956-5. PMid:26104478.
28. Lv J, Wu S, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Feng C, Yuan X, et al. Assessment of four DNA fragments (COI, 16S rDNA, ITS2, 12S rDNA) for species identification of the Ixodida (Acari: Ixodida). Parasit Vectors 2014; 7(1): 93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-93. PMid:24589289.
29. Peter RJ, Van den Bossche P, Penzhorn BL, Sharp B. Tick, fly, and mosquito Control-Lessons from the past, solutions for the future. Vet Parasitol 2005; 132(3-4): 205-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.07.004. PMid:16099104.
30. Rodríguez-Vivas RI, Rivas AL, Chowell G, Fragoso SH, Rosario CR, García Z, et al. Spatial distribution of acaricide profiles (Boophilus microplus strains susceptible or resistant to acaricides) in southeastern Mexico. Vet Parasitol 2007; 146(1-2): 158-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.01.016. PMid:17349747.
31. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MRBAYES 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003; 19(12): 1572-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. PMid:12912839.
32. Song S, Shao R, Atwell R, Barker S, Vankan D. Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships in Ixodes holocyclus and Ixodes cornuatus (Acari: Ixodidae) inferred from COX1 and ITS2 sequences. Int J Parasitol 2011; 41(8): 871-880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.03.008. PMid:21540032.
33. Tree Bio. FigTree [online]. London; 2016 [cited 2016 Apr 11]. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/
34. Wright S. Evolution in mendelian populations. Genetics 1931; 16(2): 97-159. PMid:17246615.