Capturing change in science, technology, and innovation: Improving indicators to inform policy

Capturing Change in Science, Technology, and Innovation: Improving Indicators to Inform Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-254

  Litan, Robert E ^a   Wyckoff, Andrew W ^b   Fealing, Kaye Husbands ^c  

^a Bloomberg Government   (United States)

^b OECD   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84988517257     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/18606     Document Type: Book

References (298)

1. Abowd, J.M., J. Haltiwanger, and J. Lane. (2004). Integrated longitudinal employer-employee data for the United States. The American Economic Review 94(2):224-229.
2. Abramovitz, M. (1956). Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. The American Economic Review 46:5-23.
3. Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, L. Bursztyn, and D. Hemous. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Association 102(1):131-166.
4. Adams, J., and Z. Griliches. (1996). Measuring science: An exploration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93(12):12644-12670.
5. Agarwal, A. (2012). Reinventing Education. Presented at the Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable meeting, October 10, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
6. Aizcorbe, A.M., C.E. Moylan, and C.A. Robbins. (2009). Toward better measurement of innovation and intangibles. Survey of Current Business 89(1):10-23. Available: http://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2009/01%20January/0109_innovation.pdf [September 2012].
7. Aizcorbe, A.M., E. Liebman, D. Cutler, and A. Rosen. (2012). Household consumption expenditures for medical care: An alternate presentation. Survey of Current Business 92(6):35-48. Available: http://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2012/06%20June/0612_healthcare.pdf [September 2012].
8. Alexopoulos, M., and J. Cohen. (2011). Volumes of evidence: Examining technical change in the last century through a new lens. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'Économique 44(2):413-450.
9. Anderson, G. (2011). Federal Technology Transfer Data 1987-2009. Available: http://www.nist.gov/tpo/publications/upload/Tech_Trans_Data_ Source:2011_10_4.pdf [January 2013].
10. Arundel, A., K.R. O'Brien, and A. Torugsa. (2010). Errors in the Interpretation of "Innovation": Preliminary Results from a 2007 Innovation Survey in Australia. Presented at working group meeting on statistics on science, technology, and innovation, November 22-23, Luxemburg. Available: http://eprints.utas.edu.au/10813/ [July 2013].
11. Atkinson, R.C. (1990). Supply and demand for scientists and engineers: A national crisis in the making. Science 248(4954):425-432. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/248/4954/425.abstract [December 2011].
12. Audretsch, D.B., E.E. Lehmann, and S. Warning. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy 34(7):1113-1122. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733305001071 [December 2012].
13. Auriol, L. (2010). Careers of Doctorate Holders: Employment and Mobility Patterns. Paris, France: OECD. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kmh8phxvvf5-en [January 2013].
14. Baldwin, J.R., W. Gu, A. Lafrance, and R. Macdonald. (2008). Investment in Intangible Assets in Canada: R&D, Innovation, Brand, and Mining, Oil, and Gas Exploration Expenditures. The Canadian Productivity Review Series, Catalogue No.15-206-X-No. 026. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Statistics Canada Economic Analysis Division.
15. Barnes, P. (2010). Investments in Intangible Assets and Australia's Productivity Growth: Sectoral Estimates. Productivity Commission staff Working Paper. Available: http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/99907/intangible-investment-sectoral-estimates.pdf [November 2012].
16. Barnes, P., and A. McClure. (2009). Investments in Intangible Assets and Australia's Productivity Growth. Productivity Commission staff Working Paper. Available: http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/86496/intangible-investment.pdf [November 2012].
17. Barro, R., and X. Sala-I-Martin. (1997). Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth. Journal of Economic Growth 2(1):1-27.
18. Becker, R. (2010). International branch campuses: New trends and directions. International Higher Education 58(Winter):2-3.
19. Belleflamme, P., P. Picard, and J.-F. Thisse. (2000). An economic theory of regional clusters. Journal of Urban Economics 48(1):158-184.
20. Bernanke, B. (2011). Promoting Research and Development: The Government's Role. Presented at the Conference on New Building Blocks for Jobs and Economic Growth, May 16, Washington, DC.
21. Bjelland, M., B. Fallick, J. Haltiwanger, and E. McEntarfer. (2011). Employer-to-employer flows in the United States: Estimates using linked employer-employee data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 29(4):493-505.
22. Blei, D.M., A.Y. Ng, and M.I. Jordan. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3:993-1022. Available: http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~blei/papers/BleiNgJordan2003.pdf [January 2012].
23. Borjas, G.J. (2005). The labor-market impact of high-skill immigration. American Economic Review 95(2):56-60.
24. Bornmann, L., and W. Marx. (2013). How good is research really? EMBO Reports 14(3):226-230.
25. Borousch, M. (2010, October). NSF Releases New Statistics on Business Innovation. InfoBrief NSF 11-300. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf11300/ [December 2012].
26. Boyd, D., and K. Crawford. (2011). Six Provocations for Big Data. A decade in Internet time: Symposium on the dynamics of the Internet and society. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926431 [December 2011].
27. Braunerhjelm, P., and M. Henrekson. (2013). Entrepreneurship, institutions, and economic dynamism: Lessons from a comparison of the United States and Sweden. Industrial and Corporate Change 22(1):107-130.
28. Bresnahan, T.F., and M. Trajtenberg. (1995). General purpose technologies "engines of growth." Journal of Econometrics, Annals of Econometrics 65(1):83-108.
29. Brooks, T.C., S. Carli, S., Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Mele, S., and H. Weiler. (2011). Authormagic in INSPIRE in author disambiguation in scholarly communication. Proceedings of the ACM Web Science 11:1-2. Koblenz, Germany. Available: http://www.websci11.org/fileadmin/websci/Posters/158_paper.pdf [December 2011].
30. Burrelli, J. (2010, July). Foreign Science and Engineering Students in the United States. InfoBrief NSF 10-324. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf10324/nsf10324.pdf [December 2011].
31. Card, D. (2009). How Immigration Affects U.S. Cities. In Making Cities Work: Prospects and Policies for Urban America, R.P. Inman, ed., pp. 158-200. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Carson, C.S., B.T. Grimm, and C.E. Moylan. (1994). A satellite account for research and development. Survey of Current Business 74(11):37-71.
33. Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, eds. (2008). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
34. Clark, G.L., M.S. Gertler, and M.P. Feldman, eds. (2003). The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Available: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxp:obooks:9780199250837 [December 2012].
35. Coates, J.F. (1985). Foresight in federal government policy making. Futures Research Quarterly 1(2):29-53.
36. The Conference Board. (2012). Global Business Cycle Indicators. Available: http://www.conference-board.org/data/bcicountry.cfm?cid=1 [December 2012].
37. Cooke, P., and O. Memedovic. (2003). Strategies for Regional Innovation Systems: Learning Transfer and Applications. Policy papers. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
38. Cornell University, INSEAD, and World Intellectual Property Organization. (2013). The Global Innovation Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation, S. Dutta and B. Lanvin eds. Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization.
39. Corrado, C.A., C. Hulten, and D. Sichel. (2005). Measuring capital and technology: An expanded framework. In Measuring Capital in the New Economy, C. Corrado, J. Haltiwanger, and D. Sichel, eds., pp. 11-46. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40. Corrado, C.A., C. Hulten, and D. Sichel. (2006). Intangible Capital and Economic Growth. Finance and Economics Discussion Series No. 24. Washington, DC: Division of Research and Statistics and Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve Board.
41. Corrado, C.A., J. Haskel, C. Jona-Lasinio, and M. Iommi. (2012). Intangible Capital and Growth in Advanced Economies: Measurement Methods and Comparative Results. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6733. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2114913 [September 2012].
42. Crépon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairesse. (1998). Research and development, innovation, and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7(2):115-158.
43. Dahlman, C.J. (2012). The Changing Geography of Innovation: The Rise of the BICs-Challenges and Opportunities. Policy brief, No.6. Available: http://www.growthdialogue.org/sites/default/files/publication/documents/GD_Policy_Brief_No._6_5-23-12.pdf [July 2013].
44. David, P.A. (1990). The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. The American Economic Review 80(2):355-361.
45. David, P. A. (2010). Introductory comments on innovation incentives, institutions, and economic growth. In The Rate and Direction Inventive Activity Revisited, J. Lerner and S. Stern, eds. University of Chicago Press (forthcoming).
46. David, P.A., D. Foray, and B. Hall. (2011). Measuring Smart Specialisation: The Concept and the Need for Indicators. Available: http://cemi.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/cemi/files/users/178044/public/Measuring%20smart%20specialisation.doc [April 2014].
47. Davis, T., and D.M. Hart. (2010). International cooperation to manage high-skill migration: The case of India-U.S. relations. Review of Policy Research 27(4):509-526.
48. Defoort, C. (2008). Long-term trends in international migration: An analysis of the six main receiving countries. Population-E 63(2):285-318.
49. Delbecque, V., and A. Bounfour. (2011). Intangible Investment: Contribution to Growth and Innovation Policy Issues. The European chair on intellectual capital management Working Paper Series, No. 2011-1A. Available: http://survey.peterboswell.net/media/504/delbeque_bonfour_2010.pdf [November 2012].
50. Department of Business Innovation and Skills. (2011). Innovation and Research Strategy for Growth. Available: http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/innovation/docs/e/11-1386-economics-innovation-andresearch-strategy-for-growth.pdf [May 2012].
51. Deutsche Bank Research. (2011). International Division of Labour in R&D: Research Follows Production. Available: http://www.dbresearch.de/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000269346.pdf [December 2011].
52. Dunn, A., E. Liebman, and A. Shapiro. (2012). Developing a Framework for Decomposing Medical-Care Expenditure Growth: Exploring Issues of Representativeness. Bureau of Economic Analysis Working Paper No.086. Available: http://www.bea.gov/papers/pdf/OverTimeRepresent.pdf [December 2012].
53. The Economist. (2010a). Data, Data Everywhere. Available: http://www.economist.com/node/15557443 [December 2011].
54. The Economist. (2010b). All Too Much. Monstrous Amounts of Data. Available: http://www.economist.com/node/15557421 [December 2012].
55. The Economist. (2011). Where the Geeks Go. Available: http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/09/big-data [December 2011].
56. The Economist. (2012). A Pixelated Portrait of Labor. LinkedIn Offers a New Way to Look at Employment. Available: http://www.economist.com/node/21549948 [December 2012].
57. Edelman, B., M. Ostrovsky, and M. Schwarz. (2007). Internet advertising and the generalized second-prize auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review 97(1):242-259.
58. Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, and R.R. Nelson, eds., pp. 181-208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. EMC Corporation. (2011). New Global Study: Only One-Third of Companies Making Effective Use of Data. Available: http://www.emc.com/about/news/press/2011/20111205-02.htm?pid=home-datascientist pr-120511 [December 2011].
60. European Commission. (2009). System of National Accounts 2008. United Nations, New York. Available: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/national account/docs/SNA2008.pdf [March 2012].
61. European Commission. (2010). Community Innovation Statistics. Available: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/microdata/cis [December 2012].
62. European Union. (2013). Innovation Union Scoreboard, 2013. European Commission. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius-2013_en.pdf [July 2013].
63. Eurostat. (2003). Quality Assessment of Administrative Data for Statistical Purposes. Presented at working group "Assessment of Quality in Statistics," sixth meeting, Luxembourg, October 2-3.
64. Eurostat. (2010). Sixth Community Innovation Survey: More than Half of EU27 Enterprises are Innovative. One in nine innovative enterprises cooperate with European partners. News release 166/2010, November 10. Available: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/9-10112010-AP/EN/9-10112010-AP-EN.PDF [May 2012].
65. Eurostat. (2012). The Community Innovation Survey 2012 (CIS 2012): The Harmonized Survey Questionnaire. Luxemburg: Eurostat.
66. Eurostat. (2013). Eurostat 2010 Statistics. Available: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/themes [December 2011].
67. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. (2012). Connecting Outcomes Measures in Entrepreneurship, Technology, and Science (COMETS). Available: http://www.kauffman.org/comets/ [December 2012].
68. Falck, O., and S. Heblich. (2008). Modern location factors in dynamic regions. European Planning Studies 16(10):1385-1403.
69. Federal Statistics. (2007). List of Statistical Agencies. Available: http://www.fedstats.gov/agencies/agencies.html [January 2013].
70. Feldman, M. (2013a). Patent Dataverse Network. Available: http://maryannfeldman.web.unc.edu/data-sources/rd-and-innovation/patentdataverse-network/ [January 2013].
71. Feldman, M. (2013b). STAR METRICS. Available: http://maryannfeldman.web.unc.edu/data-sources/business-creation-development/star-metrics/ [December 2012].
72. Feser, E.J., and E.M. Bergman. (2000). National industry cluster templates: A framework for applied regional cluster analysis. Regional Studies 34(1):1-19. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400050005844#preview [January 2013].
73. Finin, T., W. Murnane, A. Karandikar, N. Keller, J. Martineau, and M. Dredze. (2010). Annotating Named Entities in Twitter Data with Crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the NAACLHLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk, CSLDAMT, pp. 80-88, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for Computational Linguistics. Available: http://www.cs.jhu.edu/~mdredze/publications/amt_ner.pdf [December 2011].
74. Franzoni, C., G. Scellato, and P. Stephan. (2012). Foreign-born scientists: Mobility patterns for 16 countries. Nature Biotechnology 30(12):1250-1253.
75. Fraumeni, B., and S. Okubo. (2005). R&D in the National Income and Product Accounts: A first look at its effect on GDP. In Measuring Capital in the New Economy, C. Corrado, J. Haltiwanger, and D. Sichel, eds., pp. 275-316. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
76. Freeman, C. (1995). The "National System of Innovation" in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1):5-24.
77. Freeman, P., and W. Aspray. (1999). The Supply of Information Technology Workers in the United States. Washington, DC: Computing Research Association. Available: http://archive.cra.org/reports/wits/it_worker_shortage_book.pdf [December, 2011].
78. Fukao, K., S. Hamagata, T. Miyagawa, and K. Tonogi. (2007). Intangible Investment in Japan: Measurement and Contribution to Economic Growth. Discussion Paper No.07-E-034. Tokyo, Japan: Research Institute of Economy, Trade, and Industry.
79. Fukao, K., T. Miyagawa, K. Mukai, Y. Shinoda, and K. Tonogi, K. (2009). Intangible investment in Japan: Measurement and contribution to economic growth. Review of Income and Wealth 55(3):717-736.
80. Fukao, K., S. Hisa, and T. Miyagawa. (2012). The Measurement of Intangible Investment by Industry and Its Role in Productivity Improvements in Japan. Paper presented at the Workshop on Intangible Investment, Innovation, and Productivity at the National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP), Tokyo, Japan.
81. Furman, J.L., M.E. Porter, and S. Stern. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy 31(6):899-933.
82. Gantz, J.F., C. Chute, A. Manfrediz, S. Minton, D. Reinsel, W. Schlichting, and A. Toncheva. (2008). The Diverse and Exploding Digital Universe. An Updated Forecast of Worldwide Information Growth Through 2011. IDC White Paper. Available: http://www.emc.com/collateral/analystreports/diverse-exploding-digital-universe.pdf [December 2011].
83. Gault, F. (2010). Innovation Strategies for a Global Economy: Development, Implementation, Measurement, and Management. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
84. Gertler, M.S., P. Oinas, M. Storper, and P. Scranton. (1995). Discussion of regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, by AnnaLee Saxenian. Economic Geography 71(2):199-207.
85. Gil, V., and J. Haskel. (2008). Industry-level Expenditure on Intangible Assets in the UK. Working Paper. Available: http://www.ralfmartin.me.uk/pub/CoInvest/CoinvestGilHaspaper/Intang_Report_for_DTI_Nov08-1.pdf [July 2011].
86. Gillick, D. (2012). Predicting Movie Ratings: The Math That Won the Netflix Prize. Available: http://www.science20.com/random_walk/predicting_movie_ratings_math_won_netflix_prize [January 2012].
87. Godin, B. (2008). The Making of Statistical Standards: The OECD and the Frascati Manual, 1962-2002. Working Paper No. 39. Available: http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_39.pdf [January 2013].
88. The Government of Abu Dhabi. (2008). The Abu Dhabi Economic Vision 2030. Available: http://www.tdic.ae/en/media/get/20110814_economicvision-2030-executive-summary-mandate2propertypdf.pdf [January 2013].
89. Griliches, Z. (1958). Research cost and social returns: Hybrid corn and related innovations. Journal of Political Economy 66(5):419-431.
90. Griliches, Z. (1974). Errors in variables and other unobservables. Econometrica 42(6):971-998.
91. Griliches, Z. (1986). Economic data issues. In Handbook of Econometrics, Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator, eds., pp. 1465-1514. Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier.
92. Griliches, Z. (1998). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. In R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pp. 17-45. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
93. Grimes, S. (2011). Unstructured Data and the 80 Percent Rule. Available: http://clarabridge.com/default.aspx?tabid=137&ModuleID=635&Artic leID=551 [December 2012].
94. Groves, R.M. (2011a). A Possible Data Future for the Observational Social Sciences. Paper presented at the COSSA 30th anniversary meeting, Washington, DC. Available: http://www.cossa.org/annualmtg/2011/Robert-Groves.pdf [December 2011].
95. Groves, R.M. (2011b). Data futures for the observational social sciences. COSSA Update, 30(20B), 13-14. Available: http://www.cossa.org/volume30/Update_Volume_30_Issue_20-B.pdf [December 2011].
96. Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, Jr., M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. (2009). Survey Methodology (Second Edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Available: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470465468.html [December 2012].
97. Haak, L.L., D. Baker, D.K. Ginther, G.J. Gordon, M.A. Probus, N. Kannankutty, and B.A. Weinberg. (2012). Standards and infrastructure for innovation data exchange. Science 338(6104):196-197. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/338/6104/196.summary [January 2013].
98. Hall, B.H. (2011). Innovation and Productivity. NBER Working Paper No.17178. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
99. Hall, B.H., and A.B. Jaffe. (2012). Measuring Science, Technology, and Innovation: A Review. Report commissioned for the Panel on Developing Science, Technology, and Innovation Indicators for the Future, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC.
100. Hall, B.H., J. Mairesse, and P. Mohnen. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, B.H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, eds., pp. 1032-1080. Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier.
101. Hill, C.T. (2007). The post-scientific society. Issues in Science and Technology Fall:78-88. Available: http://www.issues.org/24.1/c_hill.html [September 2011].
102. Hollanders, H. (2013). Measuring regional innovation: A European perspective. In Global Innovation Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation, S. Dutta and B. Lanvin, eds., pp. 79-86. Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization.
103. Horrigan, M.W. (2012). Big Data and Official Statistics. Presented at National Association for Business Economics Annual Meeting, New York.
104. Horrigan, M.W. (2013). Big Data: A Perspective from the BLS. Amstat News. Available: http://magazine.amstat.org/blog/2013/01/01/scipolicy-jan2013/ [January 2013].
105. Huang, N., and E. Diewert. (2011). Estimation of R&D depreciation rates: A suggested methodology and preliminary application. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'Économique 44(2):387-412.
106. Hulten, C.R., and J.X. Hao. (2012). The Role of Intangible Capital in the Transformation and Growth of the Chinese Economy. Working Paper No.w18405, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
107. Hunt, J., and M. Gauthier-Loiselle. (2010). How much does immigration boost innovation? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2(2):31-56.
108. Hunter, P. (2013). Brain drain, brain gain, or brain sharing? New studies of the migration routes of scientists show that international mobility benefits all parties including countries that are net exporters of researchers. EMBO Reports 14(4). Available: http://embor.embopress.org/content/14/4/315 [April 2014].
109. International Monetary Fund. (2011). Sixth Edition of the IMF's Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual. Available: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2007/bopman6.htm [December 2011].
110. Jackson, S.A. (2001). The Quiet Crisis: Falling Short in Producing American Scientific and Technical Talent. BEST, San Diego, CA. Available: http://www.rpi.edu/homepage/quietcrisis/Quiet_Crisis.pdf [December 2011].
111. Jalava, J., P. Aulin-Ahmavaara, and A. Alanen. (2007). Intangible Capital in the Finnish Business Sector, 1975-2005. Discussion Paper No.1103. Helsinki, Finland: The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
112. Jankowski, J. (2012). Business Use of Intellectual Property Protection Documented in NSF Survey. InfoBrief NSF 12-307. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf12307/nsf12307.pdf [March 2012].
113. Jaumotte, F., and N. Pain. (2005). From Ideas to Development: The Determinants of R&D and Patenting. Economics Department Working Paper No. 457. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://search.oecd.org/officialdocuments/displaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=ECO/WKP(2005)44 [March 2012].
114. Jenkins, T., B. Dahlby, A. Gupta, M. Leroux, D. Naylor, and N. Robinson. (2011). Innovation Canada: A Call to Action. Review of Federal Support to Research and Development-Expert Panel Report. Available: http://rd-review.ca/eic/site/033.nsf/eng/h_00287.html [January 2013].
115. Jorgenson, D.W., and F. Gollop. (1992). Productivity growth in U.S. agriculture: A postwar perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(3):745-750.
116. Jorgenson, D.W., and Z. Griliches. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. Review of Economic Studies 34(3):249-283.
117. Jovanovic, B., and P.L. Rousseau. (2005). General purpose technologies. In Handbook of Economic Growth, P. Aghion and S. Durlauf, eds., pp. 1181-1224. Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier.
118. Kerr, W.R. (2008). Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion. The Review of Economics and Statistics 90(3):518-537.
119. Khan, M., and H. Dernis. (2006). Global Overview of Innovative Activities from the Patent Indicators Perspective. STI Working Paper No. 2006/3. Available: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5l9pscs8bmzp.pdf?expires=1360364065&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=672CE85DB36737CC5198BE447F1C3A93 [March 2012].
120. Lai, R., A. D'Mour, A., Yu, Y. Sun, V. Torvik, and L. Fleming. (2011). Disambiguation and Co-authorship Networks of the U.S. Patent Inventor Database. Available: http://scienceofsciencepolicy.net/system/files/usptodisamb8_18_2011.pdf [November 2011].
121. Lane, J., and L. Schwarz. (2012). Creating New Administrative Data to Describe the Scientific Workforce: The STAR METRICS Program. IZA Discussion Paper No. I6600. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor. Available: http://ftp.iza.org/dp6600.pdf [November 2012].
122. Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
123. Lev-Ram, M. (2011). Data Scientist: The New Hot Gig in Tech. CNN Money. Available: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/06/data-scientist-thehot-new-gig-in-tech/ [December 2011].
124. Lewin, T. (2012). Introduction for masses knocks down campus walls. The New York Times, March, 4. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/education/moocs-large-courses-open-to-all-topplecampus-walls.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 [November 2012].
125. Library of Congress. (2012). MARC Standards. Available: http://www.loc.gov/marc [January 2012].
126. Link, A.N., and J.T. Scott (2003). U.S. science parks: The diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(9):1323-1356.
127. Lipsey, R.G., K.I. Carlaw, and C.T. Bekar. (2005). Economic Transformations: General Purpose Technologies and Long-Term Economic Growth. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Available: http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199290895.do [March 2012].
128. Litan, R.E. (2010). In Defense of Much, But Not All, Financial Innovation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Available: http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2010/02/17-financial-innovation-litan [January 2013].
129. Lohr, S. (2009). For today's graduate, just one word: Statistics. The New York Times. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/06/technology/06stats.html?_r=1& [December 2012].
130. Lonmo, C. (2005). Innovation in Selected Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services: Results from the Survey of Innovation 2003. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada. Available: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/88f0006x/88f0006x2005013-eng.pdf [January 2013].
131. Lowell, B.L., and H. Salzman. (2007). Into the Eye of the Storm: Assessing the Evidence on Science and Engineering Education, Quality, and Workforce Demand. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Available: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411562_Salzman_Science.pdf [December 2011].
132. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From userproducer interaction to the national innovation systems. In Technology and Economic Theory, G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R.R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete, eds., pp. 349-370. London, Pinter Publishers.
133. Lundvall, B.-Å. ed. (1992). National System of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
134. Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). National innovation systems: Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation 14(1):95-119.
135. MADAR Research and Development. (2006). United Arab Emirates Knowledge Economy 2006. Available: http://www.madarresearch.com/default.aspx [January 2013].
136. Mairesse, J., and P. Mohnen. (2010). Using Innovations Surveys for Econometric Analysis. NBER Working Paper No. 15857. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
137. Maiya, A.S., and T.Y. Berger-Wolf. (2011). Benefits of Bias: Towards Better Characterization of Network Sampling. Available: http://arun.maiya.net/papers/maiya_etal-netbias.pdf [December 2011].
138. Mandel, M. (2012). Beyond Goods and Services: The (Unmeasured) Rise of the Data-Driven Economy. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute. Available: http://www.progressivepolicy.org/2012/10/beyondgoods-and-services-the-unmeasured-rise-of-the-data-driven-economy/ [January 2013].
139. Mandel, M., and J. Scherer (2012). The Geography of the App Economy. Available: http://southmountaineconomics.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/the_geography_of_the_app_economy-f.pdf [November 2012].
140. Manyika, J., M. Chui, B. Brown, J. Bughin, R. Dobbs, C. Roxburgh, and A.H. Byers. (2011). Big Data: The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity. Available: http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/mgi/research/technology_and_innovation/big_data_the_next_frontier_for_innovation [December 2011].
141. Marrano, M.G., J. Haskel, and G. Wallis. (2009). What happened to the knowledge economy? ICT, intangible investment, and Britain's productivity record revisited. Review of Income and Wealth 55(3):686-716.
142. Martin, B.R., and R. Johnston. (1999). Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system: Experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 60(1):37-54.
143. Marx, M., and L. Fleming. (2012). Non-compete agreements: Barriers to entry ... and exit? Innovation 12(1):39-64.
144. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2013). The Billion Prices Project. Available: http://bpp.mit.edu/ [January 2012].
145. Matloff, N. (2003). On the need for reform of the H1-B non-immigrant work visa in computer-related occupations. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 36(4):1-99. Available: http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/Mich.pdf [December 2011].
146. Minh-Tam, L., J. Sweeney, B.M. Russett, and S.W. Zucker. (2012). Structural Inference in Political Datasets. Presented at the 2012 IEEE International Conference, Arlington ,Virginia.
147. Mislove, A., M. Marcon, K.P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. (2007). Measurement and Analysis of Online Social Networks. Available: http://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2007/papers/imc170.pdf [December 2012].
148. Miyagawa, T., and S. Hisa. (2012). Estimates of Intangible Investment by Industry and Productivity Growth in Japan. Paper presented at the 32nd General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Boston, MA.
149. Molitor, N-T., N. Best, C. Jackson, and S. Richardson. (2009). Using Bayesian graphical models to model biases in observational studies and to combine multiple sources of data: Applications to low birth weight and water disinfection by-products. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 72(3):615-637.
150. Mooney, G.M., and D.J. Foley. (2011). Community Colleges: Playing an Important Role in the Education of Science, Engineering, and Health Graduates. InfoBrief NSF 11-317. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf11317/nsf11317.pdf [December 2012].
151. Moris, F. (2009). R&D exports and imports: New data and methodological issues. In International Flows of Invisibles: Trade in Services and Intangibles in the Era of Globalization, M. Reinsdorf and M. Slaughter, eds., pp. 175-202. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
152. Moris, F., and N. Kannankutty, N. (2010). New Employment Statistics from the 2008 Business R&D and Innovation Survey. InfoBrief NSF 10-326. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf10326/ [December 2011].
153. Mowery, D.C. (1992). The U.S. national innovation system: Origins and prospects for change. Research Policy 21(2):125-144.
154. Mowery, D.C. (2010). Handbook of the economics of innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 2:1219-1256.
155. Muller, E., and A. Zenker. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: The role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy 30(9):1501-1516.
156. Myers, R.E., III, and J.T. Fouts. (2004). A cluster analysis of high school science classroom environments and attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science Training 29(9):929-937.
157. Nakamura, L. (1999). Intangibles: What Put the 'New' in the New Economy? Available: http://www.phil.frb.org/research-and-data/publications/business-review/1999/july-august/brja99ln.pdf [November 2012].
158. NASSCOM, and Booz & Company. (2010). Global ER&D: Accelerating Innovation with Indian Engineering. Available: http://www.booz.com/media/uploads/NASSCOM_Booz_ESR_Report_2010.pdf [December 2011].
159. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/ [January 2013].
160. National Center for Health Statistics. (2013). Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study (B&B). Available: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/b&b/ [January 2013].
161. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2013a). Industrial Research and Development Information System. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/iris/start.cfm [November 2012].
162. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2013b). NSF Survey of Earned Doctorates: Tabulation Engine. Available: https://ncses.norc.org/NSFTabEngine/#WELCOME [November 2012].
163. National Institutes of Health. (2012). STAR METRICS. Available: https://www.starmetrics.nih.gov/ [November 2012].
164. National Research Council. (2005). Measuring Research and Development Expenditures in the U.S. Economy. Panel on Research and Development Statistics at the National Science Foundation. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. L.D. Brown, T.J. Plewes, and M.A. Gerstein, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
165. National Research Council. (2007). Innovation Inducement Prizes at the National Science Foundation. Committee on the Design of an NSF Innovation Prize. Board of Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, and Policy and Global Affairs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
166. National Research Council. (2008). Using the American Community Survey for the National Science Foundation's Science and Engineering Statistics Programs. Panel to Assess the Benefits of the American Community Survey for the National Science Foundation's Engineering Workforce Statistics Programs. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
167. National Research Council. (2010). Data on Federal Research and Development Investments: A Pathway to Modernization. Panel on Modernizing the Infrastructure of the National Science Foundation Federal Funds Survey. Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
168. National Research Council. (2012). Communicating Science and Engineering Data in the Information Age. Panel on Communicating National Science Foundation Science and Engineering Information to Data Users. Committee on National Statistics and Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
169. National Research Council. (2013a). Nonresponse in Social Science Surveys: A Research Agenda. Panel on a Research Agenda for the Future of Social Science Data Collection, Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. R. Tourangeau, and T.J. Plewes, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
170. National Research Council. (2013b). Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency: Fifth Edition. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
171. National Science Board. (2012a). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. NSB 12/01. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/ [December 2012].
172. National Science Board. (2012b). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012 Digest. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/digest12/intro.cfm [December 2012].
173. National Science Board. (2012c). Research and Development, Innovation, and the Science and Engineering Workforce. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2012/nsb1203.pdf [December 2012].
174. National Science Foundation. (2004). University-Industry Cooperative Research Programs in the Mathematical Sciences (UICRP). Available: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsf05504/nsf05504.txt [March 2012].
175. National Science Foundation. (2008). Award Database. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/piSearch.do?SearchType=piSearch&page=1&QueryText=%22text+mining%22+or+%22text+processing%22+or+%22entity+extraction%22+or+%22topic+extraction%22&PIFirstName =&PILastName=&PIInstitution=&PIState=&PIZip=&PICountry=&Restriction=2&Search=Search#results [December 2012].
176. National Science Foundation. (2010a). Discovery in a Research Portfolio: Tools for Structuring, Analyzing, Visualizing, and Interacting with Proposal and Award Portfolios. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/advcomm11_2010/CISE_SBE_ACResearchPortfolioAnalysis_Final Report.pdf [November 2012].
177. National Science Foundation. (2010b). Research and development: National trends and international linkages. In Science and Engineering Indicators: 2010, Ch. 4. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/c4/c4s5.htm [June 2011].
178. National Science Foundation. (2011a). Survey of Earned Doctorates. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvydoctorates/ [November 2012].
179. National Science Foundation. (2011b). Chapter II-Proposal Preparation Instructions. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2diii [December 2011].
180. National Science Foundation. (2012a). Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Request to Congress. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2013/pdf/10-SBE_fy2013.pdf [October 2012].
181. National Science Foundation. (2012b). Appendix: Methodology and statistics. In Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/appmeth/appmeths1.htm [January 2013].
182. National Science Foundation. (2012c). Appendix tables. In Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/appendix.htm [January 2013].
183. National Science Foundation. (2012d). Survey of Doctorate Recipients. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvydoctoratework/ [December 2012].
184. National Science Foundation. (2012e). WebCASPAR. Integrated Science and Engineering Resources Data System. Available: https://webcaspar.nsf.gov/ [December 2012].
185. National Science Foundation. (2013a). Business R&D and Innovation Survey. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvyindustry/about/brdis/ [December 2012].
186. National Science Foundation. (2013b). International Investment and R&D Data Link. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/rdlink/ [December 2012].
187. National Science Foundation. (2013c). National Patterns of R&D Resources: 2010-11 Data Update. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf13318/pdf/nsf13318.pdf [July 2013].
188. National Science Foundation. (2013d). Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/sestat/ [November 2012].
189. Nelson, R.R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1496195 [December 2012].
190. Newby, P.K., and K.L. Tucker. (2008). Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: A review. Nutrition Reviews 62(5):177-203.
191. The New York Times. (2012). The Big Three, at a Glance. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/the-big-three-moocproviders.html?_r=0 [November 2012].
192. Nicholson, S. (2012). LinkedIn Industry Trends: Winners and Losers during the Great Recession. Available: http://blog.linkedin.com/2012/03/08/economic-report/ [December 2012].
193. Nishimura, M., D. Maurer, and X. Gao. (2009). Exploring children's face-space: Multidimensional scaling analysis of the mental representation of facial identity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 103(3):366-376.
194. The Noisy Channel. (2012). Data Science at LinkedIn: My Team. Available: http://thenoisychannel.com/2012/05/17/data-science-at-linkedin-myteam/ [December 2012].
195. OECD. (1992). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, First Edition. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
196. OECD. (1995). Canberra Manual: The Measurement of Human Resources Devoted to S&T. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/kilavuzlar/Canberra.pdf [December 2012].
197. OECD. (2002). Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/document/6/0,374, en_2649_34451_33828550_1_1_1_1,00.html [December 2012].
198. OECD. (2006). KISA: Innovation and Knowledge-Intensive Service Activities. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
199. OECD. (2007). Working Party of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/science/innovationinsciencetechnologyandindustry/38235147.pdf [January 2013].
200. OECD. (2008). Compendium of Patent Statistics 2008. Available: http://www.oecd.org/science/innovationinsciencetechnologyandindustry/37569377.pdf [March 2012].
201. OECD. (2009). Innovation in Firms: A Microeconomic Perspective. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.keepeek.com/oecd/media/science-and-technology/innovation-in-firms_9789264056213-en [January 2013].
202. OECD. (2010). Measuring Innovation: A New Perspective. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/document/22/0,3746,en_41462537_41454856_44979734_1_1_1_1,00.html [December 2011].
203. OECD. (2011). OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Scoreboard 2011: Innovation and Growth in Knowledge Economies. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/document/10/0,3746,en_2649_33703_39493962_1_1_1_1,00.html#toc [December 2012].
204. OECD. (2012a). New Sources of Growth Knowledge-Based Capital Driving Investment and Productivity in the 21st Century. Interim project findings. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/science/innovationinsciencetechnologyandindustry/50498841.pdf [November 2012].
205. OECD. (2012b). Main Science and Technology Indicators (MSTI). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/science/innovationinsciencetechnologyandindustry/mainscienceandtechnologyindicatorsmsti20122edition.htm [January 2013].
206. OECD. (2012c). Knowledge Networks and Markets in the Life Sciences. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
207. OECD. (2013a). Knowledge Flows in the Innovation System: Selected Indicators and Key Trends. IPR strategies and policies in the era of knowledge networks and markets (KNM), OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry (OECD DSTI).
208. OECD. (2013b). Metadata Application. Available: http://webnet.oecd.org/rd_gbaord_metadata/Default.aspx [December 2012].
209. OECD-Eurostat. (1997). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Second Edition. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
210. OECD-Eurostat. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Third Edition. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
211. OECD-Eurostat. (2008). Manual on Business Demography Statistics. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
212. Offit, P.A. (2005). Why are pharmaceutical companies gradually abandoning vaccines? Health Affairs 24(3):622-630. Available: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/24/3/622.full.html [May 2013].
213. Okubo, S. (2012). Payments and Receipts for R&D Services: Outsourcing US R&D. Paper presented to the Panel on Developing Science, Technology, and Innovation Indicators for the Future, Washington, DC.
214. Online Computer Library Center. (2012). OCLC WorldCat and Dissertations and Theses (WorldCatDissertations). Available: http://www.oclc.org/support/documentation/firstsearch/databases/dbdetails/details/WorldCatdissertations.htm [December 2012].
215. The Partnership for a New American Economy and The Partnership for New York City. (2012). Not Coming to America: Why the U.S. Is Falling Behind in the Global Race for Talent. Available: http://www.renewoureconomy.org/sites/all/themes/pnae/not-coming-to-america.pdf [December 2011].
216. Patterson. (2009). Article-level Metrics at PLoS-Addition of Usage Data. Available: http://blogs.plos.org/plos/2009/09/article-level-metrics-atplos-addition-of-usage-data/ [November 2012].
217. Payne, G.T., C.B. Moore, S.E. Griffis, and C.W. Autry. (2011). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management 37(2):491-520.
218. Pece, C. (2012). NCSES Administrative Records Project (ARP). Presented to the Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
219. Petersen, D.R., and N. Ahmad. (2007). High-Growth Enterprises and Gazelles-Preliminary and Summary Sensitivity Analysis. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/4/39639605.pdf [December 2011].
220. Phelps, C., R. Heidl, and A. Wadhwa. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management 38(4):1115-1166.
221. Pianta, M. (2005). Innovation and employment. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, eds., pp. 568-598. New York: Oxford University Press.
222. PLOS ONE. (2012). Article-Level Metrics Information. Available: http://www.plosone.org/static/almInfo.action [November 2012].
223. Popp, D. (2010). Innovation and Climate Policy. NBER Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 15673. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15673 [January 2013].
224. Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan, Inc.
225. Priem, J., and K.L. Costello. (2010). How and Why Scholars Cite on Twitter. Available: https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=0ASyDkfrsAcUjZGRmZzc4N2NfMjIwZ2N6NXRrYzg [March 2012].
226. Priem, J., and B.M. Hemminger. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday 15. Available: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2874/2570 [December 2011].
227. ProQuest. (2012). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. Available: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/catalogs/databases/detail/pqdt.shtml [December 2012].
228. Regets, M. (2010). Employment in Science and Engineering Occupations Reached 5.8 Million in 2008. InfoBrief NSF 10-315. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf10315/nsf10315.pdf [January 2013].
229. Rogoff, K. (2011). Processed Food Very Tasty for Producers. Available: http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/industry---insights/economics/processed---food---very---tasty---for---producers [May 2013].
230. Rogoff, K. (2012). Is modern capitalism sustainable? International Economy 26(1):60. Available: http://relooney.fatcow.com/0_New_12809.pdf [December 2012].
231. Romer, P.M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5):S71-S102.
232. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
233. Rosvall, M., and C. Bergstrom. (2008). Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(4):1118-1123. Available: http://octavia.zoology.washington.edu/publications/RosvallAndBergstrom08.pdf [March 2012].
234. The Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, Networks and Nations: Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century. United Kingdom. Available: http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/knowledge-networks-nations/report/ [June 2013].
235. Ruegg, R., and I. Feller. (2003). A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment: Models, Methods, and Findings from ATP's First Decade. Gaithersburg, MD: U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
236. Ryanair. (2010). Ryanair Wins Screenscraper High Court Action. Available: http://www.ryanair.com/en/news/ryanair-wins-screenscraper-highcourt-action [December 2011].
237. Saka, A., M. Igami, and T. Kuwahara. (2010). Science Map 2010: Study on Hot Research Areas (2003-2008) by Bibliometric Method. Japan: National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP), Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT).
238. Sampat, B.N. (2011). The impact of publicly funded biomedical and health research: A review. In National Research Council, Measuring the Impacts of Federal Investments in Research: A Workshop Summary (Appendix D). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
239. Sampat, B.N., and R. Lichtenberg. (2011). What are the respective roles of the public and private sectors in pharmaceutical innovation? Health Affairs 30(2):332-339.
240. Samuelson, P. (1962). The gains from international trade once again. The Economic Journal 72(288):820-829.
241. Saxenian, A. (1996). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
242. Saxenian, A. (2002). Silicon Valley's new immigrant high-growth entrepreneurs. Economic Development Quarterly 16(1):20-31.
243. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). Theory of Economic Development. 1st ed. 1911. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
244. Shachar, A. (2006). The race for talent: Highly skilled migrants and competitive immigration regimes. New York University Law Review 81(1):148-206.
245. Shanks, S., and S. Zheng. (2006). Econometric Modelling of R&D and Australia's Productivity. Available: http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/37183/economicmodelling.pdf [December 2012].
246. Smalheiser, N.R., and V.I. Torvik. (2009). Author Name Disambiguation. Available: http://arrowsmith.psych.uic.edu/arrowsmith_uic/tutorial/ARIST_preprint.pdf [March 2012].
247. Soete, L. (2012). Maastricht Reflections on Innovation. Working Paper No. 2012-001. Maastricht, Netherlands: UNU-MERIT.
248. Soloveichik, R.H. (2010a). Artistic originals. American Economic Review 100(2):110-114.
249. Soloveichik, R.H. (2010b). Miscellaneous Artwork as a Capital Asset. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
250. Soloveichik, R.H. (2010c). Music as a Capital Asset. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
251. Soloveichik, R.H. (2010d). Theatrical Movies as Capital Assets. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
252. Soloveichik, R.H. (2011a). Research Spotlight: Artistic Originals as Capital Assets. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Available: http://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2011/06%20June/0611_artistic.pdf [April 2012].
253. Soloveichik, R.H. (2011b). Television Programs as Capital Assets. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
254. Solow, R.M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1):65-94.
255. Solow, R.M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39(3):312-320.
256. Solow, R.M. (1994). Perspectives on growth theory. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1):45-54.
257. Stanford News Service. (1995, June 5). Doctorate Surplus in Science, Engineering Is Ongoing. News Release. Available: http://www.stanford.edu/dept/news/pr/95/950605Arc5192.html [December 11, 2011].
258. Stephan, P.E. and S.G. Levin. (2001). Exceptional contributions to U.S. science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated. Population Research and Policy Review 20(1-2):59-79.
259. Stone, A., S. Rose, B. Lal, and S. Shipp. (2008). Measuring Innovation and Intangibles: A Business Perspective. Washington, DC: Science and Technology Policy Institute, Institute for Defense Analyses.
260. Tassey, G. (2011). Beyond the Business Cycle: The Need for a Technology-Based Growth Strategy. Gaithersburg, MD: Economic Analysis Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
261. Tett, G. (2009). Fool's Gold: The Inside Story of J.P. Morgan and How Wall St. Greed Corrupted Its Bold Dream and Created a Financial Catastrophe. New York: Free Press.
262. Thomson Reuters. (2012). Web of Science. Available: http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science:products/a-z/web_of_science/ [December 2012].
263. Tödtling, F., and M. Trippl. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34(8):1203-1219.
264. Travis, I. (2013). Association for Information Science and Technology. Bulletin, editor's desktop. April/May. Available: http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Apr-13/AprMay13_Editor.html [July 2013].
265. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1978). Recommendation Concerning the International Standardization of Statistics on Science and Technology. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Available: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Libary/Documents/STSManual78_en.pdf [January 2013].
266. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1984). UNESCO Manual for Statistics on Scientific and Technological Activities. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Available: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/STSManual84_en.pdf [December 2012].
267. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2010). 2010 Survey of Current Business. Research and Development Satellite Account Update: Estimates for 1959-2007. Available: http://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2010/12%20December/1210_r-d_text.pdf [March 2012].
268. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011a). The Future of Producing Social and Economic Statistical Information, Part I. Available: http://blogs.census.gov/directorsblog/2011/09/the-future-of-producing-social-and-economicstatistical-information-part-i.html [December 2011].
269. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011b). The Future of Producing Social and Economic Statistical Information, Part II. Available: http://directorsblog.blogs.census.gov/2011/09/20/the-future-of-producing-social-and-economicstatistical-information-part-ii/ [December 2011].
270. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011c). The Future of Producing Social and Economic Statistical Information, Part III. Available: http://directorsblog.blogs.census.gov/2011/10/18/the-future-of-producing-social-and-economicstatistical-information-part-iii/ [December 2011].
271. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). U.S. Census Return Rate Challenge (Visualization Competition). Available: https://www.kaggle.com/c/us-censuschallenge [December 2012].
272. U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). American Community Survey. Available: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/sample_size_and_data_quality/ [December 2012].
273. U.S. Department of Commerce. (2011). 2010 Business R&D and Innovation Survey. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvyindustry/about/brdis/surveys/srvybrdis_2010.pdf [December 2011].
274. U.S. Department of Commerce. (2012). 2011 Business R&D and Innovation Survey. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvyindustry/about/brdis/surveys/srvybrdis_2011.pdf [December 2012].
275. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2011a). H-1B Specialty Occupations, DOD Cooperative Research and Development Project Workers, and Fashion Models. Available: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=73566811264a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=73566811264a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD [January 2012].
276. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2011b). Appendix Table 3-19. Occupations of New H1B Visa Recipients: FY 2009. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/append/c3/at03-19.pdf [January 2013].
277. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2012). Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers, Fiscal Year 2011. Annual report to Congress, October 1, 2010-September 30, 2011. Available: http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resources/Reports%20and%20Studies/H-1B/h1b-fy-11-characteristics.pdf [July 2013].
278. U.S. Department of Labor. (2012a). OFLC Case Disclosure Data. Available: http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/quarterlydata.cfm [November 2012].
279. U.S. Department of Labor. (2012b). OFLC Annual Report, October, 1 2010-September 30, 2011. Available: http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/2011AR_FINAL.pdf [July 2013].
280. U.S. House of Representatives. (2010). America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010. Available: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr5116enr/html/BILLS-111hr5116enr.htm [January 2013].
281. The University of Chicago. (2013). Population Research Center. Available: http://popcenter.uchicago.edu/data/ [December 2012].
282. Updegrove, A. (2012). A Trip through the Looking Glass: Valuing Standards (and SEPs). Presented at OECD's Workshop on A Policy Framework for Knowledge-Based Capital, Washington, DC. Available: http://www.oecd.org/sti/industryandglobalisation/Updegrove.pdf [December 2012].
283. Van Reenen, J. (1997). Employment and technical innovation: Evidence from U.K. manufacturing firms. Journal of Labor Economics 15(2):255-284.
284. van Rooijen-Horsten, M., D. Van den Bergen, M. de Haan, A. Klinkers, and M. Tanriseven. (2008). Intangible Capital in the Netherlands: Measurement and Contribution to Economic Growth. Discussion Paper No. 08016. The Hague: Statistics Netherlands.
285. Wadhwa, V. (2009). Foreign-Born Entrepreneurs: An Underestimated American Resource. Available: http://www.kauffman.org/uploaded Files/WadhwaTBook09.pdf [July 2013].
286. Wehrmeyer, W., A. Clayton, and K. Lum. (2002). Foresighting for development. Journal of Corporate Environmental Strategy and Practice 37(2):24-36.
287. Weinstein, E. (unpublished). How and Why Government, Universities, and Industry Create Domestic Labor Shortages of Scientists and High-Tech Workers. Available: http://users.nber.org/~peat/PapersFolder/Papers/SG/NSF.html [December 2011].
288. West, J., and C. Bergstrom. (2010). How to improve the use of metrics. Nature 465:870-872.
289. Wikipedia. (2012). Crowdsourcing. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Crowdsourcing [December 2012].
290. Wildavsky, B. (2010). The Great Brain Race: How Global Universities Are Reshaping the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
291. Wilkinson, L., and M. Friendly. (2009). The history of the cluster heat map. American Statistician 63(2):179-184.
292. Willett, W., J. Heer, and A. Agrawala. (2012). Strategies for crowdsourcing social data analysis. In ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 227-236. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Available: http://bid.berkeley.edu/files/papers/CrowdAnalytics-CHI2012(Preprint).pdf [December 2012].
293. Williams, D. (2013). Explaining rising nonresponse rates in cross-sectional surveys. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645(1):36-59.
294. The World Bank. (1997). Expanding the Measure of Wealth: Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Development. Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs Series No. 17. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
295. Young, F.W. (2013). Multidimensional Scaling. Available: http://forrest.psych.unc.edu/teaching/p208a/mds/mds.html [January 2013].
296. Young, F.W., and R.M. Hamer. (1987). Multidimensional Scaling: History, Theory, and Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
297. Zucker, L., and M.R. Darby. (2011). Legacy and new databases for linking innovation to impact. In The Science of Science Policy: A Handbook, K.H. Fealing, J. Lane, J.H. Marburger, III, and S. Shipp, eds. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
298. Zucker, L.G., M.R. Darby, and J. Fong. (2011). Communitywide Database Designs for Tracking Innovation Impact: COMETS, STARS, and Nanobank. NBER Working Paper No. 17404. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w17404 [December 2011].