Syllabus development in new south wales: Curriculum control and its impact on teachers

Curriculum Perspectives

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 50-54

  Harris, Catherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84988292040     PISSN: 01597868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ahonen, S. (2000). Politics of identity through history curriculum: Narratives of the past for social exclusion or inclusion? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(2), 179-194.
2. Ftailey, B. (2000). The impact of mandated change on teachers. In N. Bascia & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), The sharp edge of educational change: Teaching, leading and the realities of reform (pp.112-118). London: Routledge Falmer.
3. Hoard of Studies. (2001a). The Office of the Board of Studies NSW. Retrieved from http://www.boardofsludicgjısw.odu,au/aajnain/function2.html
4. Board of Studies. (2001b). Personal communique with Betty Fletcher on 3 April 2001.
5. Board of Studies. (2001c). The Board's new syllabus development process. Sydney: Author.
6. Bradley Commission on History in Schools. (1988). Building a history curriculum: Guidelines for teaching history in schools. Washington, DC: Educational Excellence Network.
7. Cornbleth, C. (1990). Curriculum in context. Hants, UK: Falmer Press.
8. Department of Education and Training NSW. (2001). Retrieved from http://www.detnsw.edu.au/abontus.htm
9. Eltis, K. (1995). Focus on learning:Report of the review of outcomes and profiles in New South Wales schooling. Sydney; Depanment of Education and Training.
10. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer.
11. Hall, R. (1997). The dynamics of coping with curriculum change. Curriculum Perspectives, 7(1), 31-44
12. Hilferty, F. (2000, December 2-6). Subject associations: Tribal cliques or unifying networks? Paper presented at the annual Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Sydney.
13. History Teachers Association. (1998, August 29). Where's history going? Newsletter.
14. Landman, J. (2000). A state mandated curriculum, a high-stakes test: Four varied high school history departments' responses to a very new policy context. Unpublished dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
15. McNeil, L, (1986). Contradictions of control: School structures and school knowledge. Ncav York: Routledge &JCPauL
16. Phillips, R. (1998). Contesting the past, constructing the future—History, identity and politics in schools. British Journal of Educational Studies, 46(1), 40-53.
17. Reynolds, R. (2000, December 2-6). A model for researching syllabus development and curricidum change. Paper presented at the annual Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Sydney.
18. Schrag, F. (1992). Conceptions of knowledge. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook on research on curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
19. Seixas, P. (1993). Parallel crises: History and the social studies curriculum in the US. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(3), 235-250.
20. Simpson, L (2000, December 2-6). The nature and purpose of history education in schools. Paper presented aL the annual Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Sydney.
21. Taylor, T. (2000). The future of the past: Ftnal report of the national inquiry into school history. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
22. Young, C. (1998). Recasting history: For better or for worse? Public History Review, 9 18.
23. Young, M.F.D. (Ed.). (3971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: ColIier-MacmiHan.