Improving implicit discourse relation recognition through feature set optimization

SIGDIAL 2012 - 13th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 108-112

  Park, Joonsuk ^a   Cardie, Claire ^a  

^a School of Operations Research and Information Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

F1 SCORES; FEATURE COMBINATION; FEATURE SETS; PERFORMANCE GAIN; SYSTEMATIC STUDY;

FEATURE EXTRACTION;

EID: 84987948019     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Steven Bird. 2006. Nltk: the natural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive presentation sessions, COLING-ACL '06, pages 69-72, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Sasha Blair-Goldensohn, Kathleen McKeown, and Owen Rambow. 2007. Building and refining rhetoricalsemantic relation models. In HLT-NAACL, pages 428-435.
3. G. John, R. Kohavi, and K. Pfleger. 1994. Irrelevant Features and the Subset Selection Problem. In W. Cohen and H. Hirsh, editors, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 121-129. Morgan Kaufmann.
4. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, pages 423-430.
5. Beth Levin and Harold Somers. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University Of Chicago Press.
6. Ziheng Lin, Min-Yen Kan, and Hwee Tou Ng. 2009. Recognizing implicit discourse relations in the penn discourse treebank. In EMNLP, pages 343-351.
7. Annie Louis, Aravind K. Joshi, Rashmi Prasad, and Ani Nenkova. 2010. Using entity features to classify implicit discourse relations. In SIGDIAL Conference, pages 59-62.
8. Daniel Marcu and Abdessamad Echihabi. 2002. An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations. In ACL, pages 368-375.
9. M. Marcus, M. Marcinkiewicz, and B. Santorini. 1993. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
10. Emily Pitler, Mridhula Raghupathy, Hena Mehta, Ani Nenkovak, Alan Lee, and Aravind K. Joshi. 2008. Easily identifiable discourse relations. In COLING (Posters), pages 87-90.
11. Emily Pitler, Annie Louis, and Ani Nenkova. 2009. Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text. In ACL/AFNLP, pages 683-691.
12. Rashmi Prasad, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee, Eleni Miltsakaki, Livio Robaldo, Aravind Joshi, and Bonnie Webber. 2008. The penn discourse treebank 2.0. In Bente Maegaard Joseph Mariani Jan Odjik Stelios Piperidis Daniel Tapias Nicoletta Calzolari (Conference Chair), Khalid Choukri, editor, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), Marrakech, Morocco, may. European Language Resources Association (ELRA). http://www.lrecconf. org/proceedings/lrec2008/.
13. P J Stone, D C Dunphy, M S Smith, and D M Ogilvie. 1966. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis, volume 08. MIT Press.
14. Ben Wellner, Lisa Ferro, Warren R. Greiff, and Lynette Hirschman. 2006. Reading comprehension tests for computer-based understanding evaluation. Natural Language Engineering, 12(4):305-334.
15. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In HLT/EMNLP.
16. Zhi-Min Zhou, Yu Xu, Zheng-Yu Niu, Man Lan, Jian Su, and Chew Lim Tan. 2010. Predicting discourse connectives for implicit discourse relation recognition. In COLING (Posters), pages 1507-1514.