Predicting discourse connectives for implicit discourse relation recognition

Coling 2010 - 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 1507-1514

  Zhou, Zhi Min ^a   Xu, Yu ^a   Niu, Zheng Yu ^b   Lan, Man ^c   Su, Jian ^c   Tan, Chew Lim ^d  

^a EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Toshiba China R and D Center   (China)

^c INSTITUTE FOR INFOCOMM RESEARCH   (Singapore)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASELINE SYSTEMS; F-SCORE; LANGUAGE MODEL; STATE OF THE ART; TREEBANKS;

ALGORITHMS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 80053408995     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. J. Baldridge and A. Lascarides. 2005. Probabilistic head-driven parsing for discourse structure. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning.
2. L. Carlson, D. Marcu, and Ma. E. Okurowski. 2001. Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory. Proceedings of the Second SIG dialWorkshop on Discourse and Dialogue.
3. B. Dorr. LCS Verb Database. Technical Report Online Software Database, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 2001.
4. R. Girju. 2003. Automatic detection of causal relations for question answering. In ACL 2003 Workshops.
5. S. Blair-Goldensohn. 2007. Long-Answer Question Answering and Rhetorical-Semantic Relations. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia Unviersity.
6. M. Lapata and A. Lascarides. 2004. Inferring Sentence-internal Temporal Relations. Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Assocation of Computational Linguistics.
7. Z.H. Lin, M.Y. Kan and H.T. Ng. 2009. Recognizing Implicit Discourse Relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank. Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on EMNLP.
8. D. Marcu and A. Echihabi. 2002. An Unsupervised Approach to Recognizing Discourse Relations. Proceedings of the 40th ACL.
9. E. Pitler, A. Louis, A. Nenkova. 2009. Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text. Proceedings of the 47th ACL.
10. E. Pitler and A. Nenkova. 2009. Using Syntax to Disambiguate Explicit Discourse Connectives in Text. Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers.
11. M. Porter. 1980. An algorithm for suffix stripping. In Program, vol. 14, no. 3, pp.130-137.
12. R. Prasad, N. Dinesh, A. Lee, E. Miltsakaki, L. Robaldo, A. Joshi, B.Webber. 2008. The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. Proceedings of LREC'08.
13. M. Saito, K.Yamamoto, S.Sekine. 2006. Using Phrasal Patterns to Identify Discourse Relations. Proceeding of the HLTCNA Chapter of the ACL.
14. R. Soricut and D. Marcu. Sentence Level Discourse Parsing using Syntactic and Lexical Information. Proceedings of HLT/NAACL 2003.
15. C. Sporleder and A. Lascarides. 2008. Using automatically labelled examples to classify rhetorical relations: an assessment. Natural Language Engineering, Volume 14, Issue 03.
16. P.J. Stone, J. Kirsh, and Cambridge Computer Associates. 1966. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT Press.
17. B.Wellner, J. Pustejovsky, C. H. R. S., A. Rumshisky. 2006. Classification of discourse coherence relations: An exploratory study using multiple knowledge sources. Proceedings of the 7th SIGDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue.
18. F. Wolf, E. Gibson, A. Fisher, M. Knight. 2005. The Discourse GraphBank: A database of texts annotated with coherence relations. Linguistic Data Consortium.