Blood sampling - Two sides to the story

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 59, Issue , 2017, Pages 234-242

  Pickup, Laura ^a   Atkinson, Sarah ^a   Hollnagel, Erik ^b   Bowie, Paul ^c,d   Gray, Sandra ^e   Rawlinson, Sam ^f   Forrester, Kate ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b Center for Quality Improvement   (Denmark)

^c NHS EDUCATION FOR SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^e SCOTTISH NATIONAL BLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

^f East of Scotland Blood Transfusion Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blood sampling; Resilience; Wrong blood in tube

Indexed keywords

HOSPITALS;

BLOOD SAMPLING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; FUNCTIONAL RESONANCE ANALYSIS METHODS (FRAM); MULTI METHODS; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES; RESILIENCE; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; WORKING ENVIRONMENT;

BLOOD;

BLOOD SAMPLING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; ERGONOMICS; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PHYSICIAN; PILOT STUDY; SAFETY; SCOTLAND; STAFF; WORK ENVIRONMENT; BIOENGINEERING; DEVICES; MEDICAL ERROR; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; WORKLOAD; WORKPLACE;

BLOOD SPECIMEN COLLECTION; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; HOSPITALS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; PATIENT SAFETY; PILOT PROJECTS; WORKLOAD; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84987942334     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.027     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bolton-Maggs, P.H.B., Poles, D., Watt, A., et al. On behalf of the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) steering group. 2013 Annu. SHOT Rep., 2014, 1–197.
2. British Committee for Standards in Haematology, Guideline on the Administration of Blood Components. 2012 http://www.bcshguidelines.com/documents/Admin_blood_components_bcsh_05012010.pdf (accessed 02.02.15.).
3. Callum, J.L., Lin, Y., Lima, A.P., et al. Transitioning from ‘blood’ safety to ‘transfusion’ safety: addressing the single biggest risk of transfusion. ISBT Sci. Ser. 6 (2011), 96–104.
4. Carayon, P., Schoofs Hundt, A., Karsh, B.-T., et al. Work System design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual. Saf. Healthc. 15 (2006), 50–58.
5. Cottrell, S., Watson, D., Eyre, T.A., et al. Interventions to reduce wrong blood in tube errors in transfusion: a systematic review. Transfus. Med. Rev. 27 (2013), 197–205.
6. Davies, A., Staves, J., Kay, J., et al. End-to-end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknesses. Transfusion 46 (2006), 352–364.
7. Dekker, S., Resilience engineering: chronicling the emergence of confused consensus. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Leveson, N., (eds.) Resilience Engineering, Concepts and Precepts, 2006, 77–92.
8. Department of Health, An Organisation with a Memory. 2000, The Stationary Office, London, 1–108 http://www.aagbi.org/sites/default/files/An%20organisation%20with%20a%20memory.pdf (accessed 16.02.15.).
9. Department of Health and Design Council, Design for Patient Safety. 2003 www.doh.gov.uk/designforpatientsafety (accessed 26.01.15.).
10. Department of Health, Australia, Reducing Harm in Blood Transfusion Investigating the Human Factors Behind ‘Wrong Blood in Tube’ (WBIT) Events in the Emergency Department. 2013, Department of Health, Australia, 75.
11. Dzik, W.H., Murphy, M.F., Andreu, G., et al. An international study of the performance of sample collection from patients. Vox Sang. 85:1 (2003), 40–47.
12. EN ISO 14971:2000, Medical Devices – Application of Risk Management to Medical devices. 2000.
13. Eurocontrol, From Safety-I to Safety-II: A white paper. Eurocontrol, 32, 2013 https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/nm/safety/safety_whitepaper_sept_2013-web.pdf (accessed 30.10.14.).
14. Eysenck, M.W., Byrne, A., Anxiety and susceptibility to distraction. Pers. Individ. Differ. 13 (1992), 793–798.
15. Eysenck, M.W., Santos, R., Derakshan, R., et al. Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion 7 (2007), 336–353.
16. Folkman, S., Personal control and stress and coping processes: a theoretical analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46:4 (1984), 839–852.
17. Gonzalez-Porras, J.R., Graciani, I.F., Alvarez, M., et al. Tubes for pre transfusion testing should be collected by blood bank staff and hand labelled until the implementation of new technology for improved sample labelling. Results of a prospective study. Vox Sang. 95:1 (2008), 52–56.
18. Health and Safety executive, The Development of a Fatigue/Risk Index for Shiftworkers., 2006, Health and Safety Executive, UK Research report 446.
19. Health and Safety Executive, High Reliability Organisations – A Review of the Literature., 2011 Research report No. RR899.
20. Hollnagel, E., FRAM: the Functional Resonance Analysis Method. 2012, Ashgate, Farnham, UK.
21. Hollnagel, E., Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management. 2014, Ashgate, Farnham, UK.
22. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Wreathall, J., Resilience Engineering in Practice a Guidebook. 2011, Ashgate, Farnham, UK.
23. Hollnagel, E., Braithwaite, J., Wears, R.L., Resilient Health Care. 2013, Ashgate, Farnham, UK:.
24. Kaplan, H.S., Battles, J.B., Vander Schaff, T.W., et al. Identification and classification of the causes of events in transfusion medicine. Transfusion 38 (1998), 1071–1081.
25. Lawton, R., Taylor, N., Clay-Williams, R., et al. Positive deviance: a different approach to achieving patient safety. BMJ Qual. Saf. 0 (2014), 1–4, 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003115.
26. Lumadue, J.A., Boyd, J.S., Ness, P.M., Adherence to a strict specimen-labeling policy decreases the incidence of erroneous blood grouping of blood bank specimens. Transfusion 37 (1997), 1169–1172.
27. Macdonald, W., Bendak, S., Effects of workload level and 8-versus 12-h workday duration on test battery performance. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 26 (2000), 399–416.
28. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis. 1994, SAGE Publications, California.
29. ISO/DIS6385, Ergonomic Principles in the Design of Work Systems. 2014.
30. Quillen, K., Murphy, K., Quality improvement to decrease specimen mislabelling in transfusion medicine. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 130 (2006), 1196–1198.
31. Stainsby, D., ABO incompatible transfusions—experience from the UK Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme: transfusions ABO incompatible. Transfus. Clin. Biol. 12:5 (2005), 385–388.
32. Taylor-Adams, S., Vincent, C., Systems analysis of clinical incidents: the London protocol. Clin. Risk. 10 (2004), 211–220 http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/SystemsAnalysisofClinicalIncidentsTheLondonProtocol.aspx (accessed 26.01.15.).
33. Wallin, O., Söderberg, J., Van Guelpen, B., et al. Blood sample collection and patient identification demand improvement: a questionnaire study of preanalytical practices in hospital wards and laboratories. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 24:3 (2010), 581–591.
34. Woods, D.D., Resilience and the ability to anticipate. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Wreathall, J., (eds.) Resilience Engineering in Practice a Guidebook, 2011, Ashgate, Farnham, UK, 121–126.