Immersivedeck: A large-scale wireless VR system for multiple users

2016 IEEE 9th Workshop on Software Engineering and Architectures for Realtime Interactive Systems, SEARIS 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages

  Podkosova, Iana ^a   Vasylevska, Khrystyna ^a   Schoenauer, Christian ^a   Vonach, Emanuel ^a   Fikar, Peter ^a   Bronederk, Elisabeth ^a   Kaufmann, Hannes ^a  

^a TU   (Austria)

Author keywords

Computer Graphics I.3.7 : Virtual Reality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

3D INTERACTIONS; IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY; LARGE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; MOTION CAPTURE; MULTIPLE USER; OPTICAL HEADS; PROOF OF CONCEPT; REAL-WORLD OBJECTS;

NETWORK ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 84987936709     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SEARIS.2016.7551581     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. S. S. Chance, F. Gaunet, A. C. Beall, and J. M. Loomis. Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence, 7(2):168-178, 1998.
2. E. Hodgson, E. R. Bachmann, D. Vincent, M. Zmuda, D. Waller, and J. Calusdian. Weavr: A self-contained and wearable immersive virtual environment simulation system. Behavior research methods, 47(1):296-307, 2015.
3. M. Latoschik and W. Stuerzlinger. On the art of the evaluation and presentation of ris-engineering. In Software Engineering and Architectures for Realtime Interactive Systems (SEARIS), 2014 IEEE 7th Workshop on, pages 9-17, March 2014.
4. A. Mossel and H. Kaufmann. Wide area optical user tracking in unconstrained indoor environments. In Proceedings of the The 23rd International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence, pages 108-115. IEEE, 2013.
5. R. A. Ruddle and S. Lessels. The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 16(1):5, 2009.
6. M. Slater, M. Usoh, and A. Steed. Taking steps: The influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 2(3):201-219, Sept. 1995.
7. A. Steed, W. Steptoe, W. Oyekoya, F. Pece, T. Weyrich, J. Kautz, D. Friedman, A. Peer, M. Solazzi, F. Tecchia, M. Bergamasco, and M. Slater. Beaming: An asymmetric telepresence system. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 32(6):10-17, Nov 2012.
8. E. Suma, S. Babu, and L. Hodges. Comparison of travel techniques in a complex, multi-level 3d environment. In 3D User Interfaces, 2007. 3DUI07. IEEE Symposium on, March 2007.
9. E. Suma, S. L. Finkelstein, S. Clark, P. Goolkasian, L. F. Hodges, et al. Effects of travel technique and gender on a divided attention task in a virtual environment. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2010 IEEE Symposium on, pages 27-34. IEEE, 2010.
10. J. Thomas, R. Bashyal, S. Goldstein, and E. Suma. Muvr: A multiuser virtual reality platform. In Virtual Reality (VR), 2014 iEEE, pages 115-116, March 2014.
11. D. Waller, E. Bachmann, E. Hodgson, and A. Beall. The hive: A huge immersive virtual environment for research in spatial cognition. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4):835-843, 2007.