Effects of travel technique and gender on a divided attention task in a virtual environment

3DUI 2010 - IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces 2010, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 27-34

  Suma, Evan A ^a   Finkelstein, Samantha L ^a   Clark, Seth ^a   Goolkasian, Paula ^a   Hodges, Larry F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

H.5.1 Information Interfaces and Presentation : multimedia information systems artificial, augmented, and virtual realities; I.3.6 computer graphics : methodology and techniques interaction techniques; I.3.7 computer graphics : three dimensional graphics and realism virtual reality; Locomotion; Navigation; User study; Virtual environments

Indexed keywords

H.5.1 [INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION]: MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION SYSTEMS - ARTIFICIAL , AUGMENTED , AND VIRTUAL REALITIES; I.3.6 [COMPUTER GRAPHICS]: METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES; I.3.7 [COMPUTER GRAPHICS]: THREE-DIMENSIONAL GRAPHICS AND REALISM; I.3.7 [COMPUTER GRAPHICS]: THREE-DIMENSIONAL GRAPHICS AND REALISM - VIRTUAL REALITY; USER STUDY; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; NAVIGATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; USER INTERFACES;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 77953075605     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/3DUI.2010.5444726     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. http://wiiyourself.gl.tter.org.
2. S. Babu, T. Grechkin, B. Chihak, C. Ziemer, J. Kearney, J. Cremer, and J. Plumert. A virtual peer for investigating social influences on children's bicycling. In IEEE Virtual Reality, pages 91-98, 2009.
3. D. A. Bowman, E. T. Davis, L. F. Hodges, and A. N. Badre. Maintaining spatial orientation during travel in an immersive virtual environment. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 8(6):618-631, 1999.
4. D. A. Bowman, D. Koller, and L. F. Hodges. Travel in immersive virtual environments: An evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pages 45-52, 1997.
5. D. A. Bowman, D. Koller, and L. F. Hodges. A methodology for the evaluation of travel techniques for immersive virtual environments. Virtual Reality, 3(2):120-131, 1998.
6. D. A. Bowman, E. Kruijff, J. J. LaViola, and I. Poupyrev. 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA, 2004.
7. G. Bruder, F. Steinicke, H. Frenz, M. Lappe, and K. H. Hinrichs. Impact of gender on discrimination between real and virtual stimuli. In Workshop on Perceptual Illusions in Virtual Environments, pages 10-15, 2009.
8. S. S. Chance, F. Gaunet, A. C. Beall, and J. M. Loomis. Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 7(2):168-178, 1998. (Pubitemid 128056662) (Pubitemid 128344169)
9. N. Elmqvist, M. E. Tudoreanu, and P. Tsigas. Evaluating motion constraints for 3D wayfinding in immersive and desktop virtual environments. In ACM SIGCHI, pages 1769-1778, 2008.
10. P. Foos and P. Goolkasian. Presentation format effects in a levels-of-processing task. Experimental Psychology, 55(4):215-227, 2008.
11. N. W. Francis and H. Kučera. Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Journal of English Linguistics, 18(1):64-70, 1982.
12. J. Guilford and W. Zimmerman. The Guilford-Zimmerman aptitude survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32:24-34, 1948.
13. V. Interrante, B. Ries, and L. Anderson. Seven league boots: A new metaphor for augmented locomotion through moderately large scale immersive virtual environments. In IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, pages 167-170, 2007.
14. J. J. Feasel, M. Whitton, and J. Wendt. LLCM-WIP: Low-latency, continuous-motion walking-in-place. In IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, pages 97-104, 2008.
15. D. Jeong, C. Lee, G. Jeon, C. Song, S. Babu, and L. Hodges. Differentiation on information gathering ability in real and virtual world. In International Conference on Pacific Graphics, pages 157-159, 2005. Short paper.
16. R. Kennedy, N. Lane, K. Berbaum, and M. Lilienthal. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3):203-220, 1993.
17. S. Lambrey and A. Berthoz. Gender differences in the use of external landmarks versus spatial representations updated by self-motion. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 6(3):1769-1778, 2007.
18. S. Moffata, E. Hampsona, and M. Hatzipantelisa. Navigation in a "virtual" maze: Sex differences and correlation with psychometric measures of spatial ability in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 10(2):73-87, 1998.
19. B. B. Murdock. Item and order information in short-term serial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105(2):191-216, 1976.
20. M. Peters, B. Laeng, K. Latham, M. Jackson, R. Zaiyouna, and C. Richardson. A redrawn Vandenberg & Kuse mental rotations test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28:39-58, 1995.
21. S. Razzaque. Redirected Walking. PhD thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2005.
22. R. A. Ruddle and S. Lessels. For efficient navigational search, humans require full physical movement, but not a rich visual scene. Psychological Science, 17(6):460-465, 2006.
23. R. A. Ruddle and S. Lessels. The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction, 16(1):1-18, 2009.
24. M. C. Schwaiger, T. Thummel, and H. Ulbrich. A 2D-motion platform: The Cybercarpet. In Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pages 415-420, 2007.
25. E. Suma, S. Babu, and L. Hodges. Comparison of travel techniques in a complex, multi-level 3D environment. In IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, pages 147-153, 2007.
26. E. Suma, S. Finkelstein, M. Reid, S. Babu, A. Ulinski, and L. Hodges. Evaluation of the cognitive effects of travel technique in complex real and virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2009. Preprint.
27. R. M. Taylor, T. C. Hudson, A. Seeger, H.Weber, J. Juliano, and A. T. Helser. VRPN: a device-independent, network-transparent VR peripheral system. In ACM Virtual Reality Software & Technology, pages 55-61, 2001.
28. M. Usoh, K. Arthur, M. C. Whitton, R. Bastos, A. Steed, M. Slater, and F. P. Brooks. Walking 〉 walking-in-place 〉 flying, in virtual environments. In ACM SIGGRAPH, pages 359-364, 1999.
29. D. Voyer, S. Voyer, and M. P. Bryden. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2):250-270, 1995.
30. G. Welch and E. Foxlin. Motion tracking: No silver bullet, but a respectable arsenal. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 22(6):24-38, 2002.
31. M. C. Whitton, J. V. Cohn, J. Feasel, P. Zimmons, S. Razzaque, S. J. Poulton, B. McLeod, and J. Frederick P. Brooks. Comparing VE locomotion interfaces. In IEEE Virtual Reality, pages 123-130, 2005.
32. S. D. Young, B. D. Adelstein, and S. R. Ellis. Demand characteristics in assessing motion sickness in a virtual environment: Or does taking a motion sickness questionnaire make you sick? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(3):422-428, 2007.
33. C. A. Zanbaka, B. C. Lok, S. V. Babu, A. C. Ulinski, and L. F. Hodges. Comparison of path visualizations and cognitive measures relative to travel technique in a virtual environment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 11(6):694-705, 2005.