Born in the USA: How a Broken Maternity System Must Be Fixed to Put Women and Children First

Born in the USA: How a Broken Maternity System Must Be Fixed to Put Women and Children First

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-295

  Wagner, Marsden ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986265088     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (357)

1. FDA Drug Information Sheet, "Misoprostol (Marketed as Cytotec)," May 2005, posted at www.Druginfo@cder.fda.gov.
2. M. Plaut, M. Schwartz, and S. Lubarsky, "Uterine Rupture Associated with the Use of Misoprostol in the Gravid Patient with a Previous Cesarean Section," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 180, no. 6 (1999): 1535-40.
3. H. Blanchette, S. Nayak, and S. Erasmus, "Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravaginal Misoprostol with Those of Dinoprostone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor in a Community Hospital," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 180, no. 6 (1999): 1543-50.
4. H. Goer, The Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth (New York: Penguin Putnam, 1999).
5. World Health Organization, Having a Baby in Europe (Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 1985).
6. A National Survey of Obstetric Practices, published October 24, 2002, by the Maternity Center Association of New York City (now named Childbirth Connection).
7. S. Daniels and L. Andrews, "The Shadow of the Law: Jury Decisions in Obstetrics and Gynecology Cases," in Medical Professional Liability and the Delivery of Obstetrical Care, ed. V. P. Rostow and R. J. Bulger (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1989), 2:161-91.
8. J. B. Gould, C. Qin, and G. Chavez, "Time of Birth and the Risk of Neonatal Death," Obstetrics and Gynecology 106 (2005): 352-58.
9. Daniels and Andrews, "Shadow of the Law."
10. M. Enkin et al., "Social and Professional Support in Childbirth," in A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 247- 54.
11. S. Flynn, "Continuity of Care during Pregnancy and Birth: Effects on Outcome," Journal of Family Practice 5 (1985): 375-80.
12. www.acog.org.
13. Goer, Thinking Woman's Guide, pp. 85-98.
14. Enkin et al., Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, p. 388.
15. Goer, Thinking Woman's Guide, pp. 49-74.
16. B. Leighton and S. Halpern, "The Effects of Epidural Anesthesia on Labor, Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 186 (2002): 569-77.
17. Goer, Thinking Woman's Guide, pp. 126-48.
18. K. Hartmann et al., "Outcomes of Routine Episiotomy: A Systematic Review," Journal of the American Medical Association 293 (2005): 2141-48.
19. "Mothering Perinatal Healthcare Index," Mothering 68 (Fall 1993): 44-45.
20. Safe Motherhood: Preventing Pregnancy-Related Illness and Death (Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001).
21. www.cdc.gov/nchs/birth.
22. M. MacDorman and G. Singh, "Midwifery Care, Social and Medical Risk Factors, and Birth Outcomes in the USA," Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 52 (1998): 310-17.
23. M. Wagner, "A Global Witch Hunt," Lancet 346 (1995): 1020-22.
24. www.motherfriendly.org.
25. J. Murphy- Lawless, Reading Birth and Death: A History of Obstetric Thinking (Cork, Ireland: Cork University Press, 1998).
26. V. Turner, The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure; The Lewis Henry Morgan Lectures (London: Routledge & K. Paul, 1969).
27. J. Moseley et al., "A Controlled Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the Knee," New England Journal of Medicine 347, no. 2 (2002): 81-88.
28. M. Wagner, "Critique of British Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report of Oct 2001," MIDIRS Journal 12, no. 3 (2002): 366-70.
29. Dateline NBC, November 4, 2001.
30. M. McCarthy, "US Maternal Death Rates Are on the Rise," Lancet 348 (1996): 394.
31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), "Safe Motherhood: Preventing Pregnancy-Related Illness and Death," Obstetrics and Gynecology 88 (2001): 61-67.
32. McCarthy, "US Maternal Death Rates Are on the Rise".
33. G. L. Rubin et al., "Maternal Death after Cesarean Section in Georgia," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 139 (1981): 681-85.
34. I. M. Gaskin, Ina May's Guide to Natural Childbirth (New York: Bantam Books, 2003), pp. 282-84.
35. A. Panting-Kemp et al., "Maternal Deaths in an Urban Perinatal Network: 1992-1998," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 183 (2000): 1207-12.
36. K. Johnson and B. Daviss, "Outcomes of Planned Home Births with Certified Professional Midwives: Large Prospective Study in North America," British Medical Journal 330 (June 2005): 1416.
37. P. Murphy et al., "Outcomes of Intended Home Births in Nurse- Midwifery Practice: A Prospective Descriptive Study," Obstetrics and Gynecology 92, no. 3 (1998): 461-70.
38. P. Stephenson et al., Alternative Birth Centers in Illinois: A Resource Guide for Policy Makers (Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Research on Women and Gender, and the Health and Medicine Policy and Research Group, 1995).
39. J. Rooks et al., "The National Birth Center Study," New England Journal of Medicine 321 (1989): 1804-11.
40. M F. Greene, "Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Revisited," New England Journal of Medicine 351, no. 25 (2004): 2647-49.
41. M. Landon et al. (NIH), "Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor with Prior Cesarean Section," New England Journal of Medicine 351, no. 25 (2004): 2655-59.
42. "Labor and Birth after Previous Cesarean," chapter 38, posted on www.nichd.nih.gov.
43. Rita Rubin, "Battle Lines Drawn over C-Sections," USA Today, August 24, 2005.
44. M. McMahon, "Comparison of a Trial of Labor with an Elective Second Cesarean Section," New England Journal of Medicine 335, no. 10 (1996): 689-95.
45. S. Chauhan et al., "Cesarean Section for Suspected Fetal Distress: Does the Decision-Incision Time Make a Difference?" Journal of Reproductive Medicine 42, no. 6 (1997): 347-52.
46. J. Miller and J. Petrie, "Development of Practice Guidelines," Lancet 355, no. 9198 (2000): 82-83.
47. www.now.org.
48. "Clinical Guidelines for Maternity Care," posted on www.aafp.org.
49. R. Hall et al., "Oral versus Vaginal Midoprostol (Cytotec) for Labor Induction," Obstetrics and Gynecology 99 (2002): 1044-48.
50. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health, "Ethical Aspects Regarding Cesarean Delivery for Nonmedical Reasons," International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 64 (1999): 317-22.
51. W. Harer, "Patient Choice Cesarean," American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Review 5, no. 2 (2000): 16-20.
52. V. Iovine, The Girlfriends' Guide to Pregnancy (New York: Pocket Books, 1995), pp. 217-18.
53. W. B. Harer, "Patient Choice Cesarean," American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Review 5, no. 2 (2000): 12-16.
54. www.cdc.gov/nchs/birth
55. M. Hurst and P. Summary, "Childbirth and Social Class: The Case of Cesarean Section," Social Science and Medicine 18 (1984): 621-31.
56. M. Wagner, Pursuing the Birth Machine: The Search for Appropriate Birth Technology (London: ACE Graphics, 1994), pp. 186-88.
57. M. Wagner, "Choosing Caesarean Section," Lancet 356 (2000): 1677-80.
58. World Health Organization, "Having a Baby in Europe," Public Health in Europe 26 (1985): 85.
59. M. Enkin et al., A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 271.
60. H. Goer, The Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth (New York: Penguin Putnam, 1999), pp. 85-98.
61. B. Backie and J. Nackling, "Term Prediction in Routine Ultrasound Practice," Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 73 (1994): 113-18.
62. Wagner, Pursuing the Birth Machine, pp. 186-88.
63. P. Stephenson, International Differences in the Use of Obstetrical Interventions (Copenhagen: World Health Organization European Regional Office, 1992), pp. 6-10.
64. Susan Brink, "Too Posh to Push? Cesarean Sections Have Spiked Dramatically. Progress or Convenience?" U.S. News and World Report, August 5, 2002, pp. 42-43.
65. G. Feldman and J. Freiman, "Prophylactic Cesarean Section at Term?" New England Journal of Medicine 312, no. 19 (1985): 1264-67.
66. B. Sachs, M. Castro, and F. Frigoletto, "The Risk of Lowering the Cesarean- Delivery Rate," New England Journal of Medicine 140 (1999): 54-57.
67. J. Brody, "Warning on Drop in Cesarean Births: 4 Top Specialists Challenge Government's Goal, Citing Dangers," New York Times, January 7, 1999.
68. K. Springer, "The Right to Choose. Cesarean Sections Are on the Rise Again. Public-Health Officials Want to Limit Them, but Many Patients and Doctors Are Resisting," Newsweek, December 4, 2000, pp. 73-74.
69. M. Greene, "Vaginal Delivery after Cesarean Section-Is the Risk Acceptable?" New England Journal of Medicine 345 (2001): 54-55.
70. Enkin et al., Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth.
71. Goer, Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth.
72. Wagner, Pursuing the Birth Machine.
73. G. Buchsbaum et al., "Urinary Incontinence in Nulliparous Women and Their Parous Sisters," Obstetrics and Gynecology 106 (2005): 1259-65.
74. M. Hall and S. Bewley, "Maternal Mortality and Mode of Delivery," Lancet 354 (1999): 776.
75. U.K. Department of Health, Why Mothers Die: Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths (London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1999).
76. G. C. S. Smith et al., "Cesarean Section and Risk of Unexplained Stillbirth in Subsequent Pregnancy," Lancet 362 (2003): 1779-84.
77. E. Hemminki et al., "Long-Term Effects of Cesarean Sections: Ectopic Pregnancies and Placental Problems," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 174, no. 5 (1996): 1569-75.
78. A. Kolaas et al., "Is Planned Caesarean Section Better than Planned Vaginal Delivery for the Child?" submitted for publication, 2005.
79. O. Hjalmarson, "Epidemiology of Neonatal Disorders of Respiration," International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 7, supplement 1 (1991).
80. J. Lomas and M. Enkin, "Variations in Operative Delivery Rates," in Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, ed. I. Chalmers, M. Enkin, and M. Keirse (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).
81. Harer, "Patient Choice Cesarean."
82. Water: The Need to Humanize Birth," International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 75, supplement (2001): s25-37.
83. J. Potter et al., "Unwanted Caesarean Sections among Public and Private Patients in Brazil: A Prospective Study," British Medical Journal 323 (2001): 1155-58.
84. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health, "Ethical Aspects Regarding Cesarean Delivery for Nonmedical Reasons," International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 64 (1999): 317-22.
85. World Health Organization, "Appropriate Technology for Birth," Lancet 2, no. 8452 (1985): 436-37.
86. F. Notzon, "International Differences in the Use of Obstetric Interventions," Journal of the American Medical Association 263, no. 24 (1990): 3286- 91.
87. Lomas and Enkin, "Variations in Operative Delivery Rates."
88. Sachs, Castro, and Frigoletto, "Risk of Lowering the Cesarean-Delivery Rate."
89. Wagner, "Fish Can't See Water."
90. A. Betran et al., "Rates of Caesarean Section: Analysis of Global and Regional Estimates and Correlation with Indicators of Reproductive Health System Development," presented at the International Forum on Birth, Rome, June 2005, and accepted for publication in Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology.
91. L. Leeman and R. Leeman, "A Native American Community with a 7% Cesarean Delivery Rate: Does Case Mix, Ethnicity or Labor Management Explain the Low Rate?" Annals of Family Medicine 1 (2003): 36-43.
92. Harer, "Patient Choice Cesarean," p.18.
93. I. M. Gaskin, Ina May's Guide to Childbirth (New York, Bantam Books, 2003), p. 234.
94. Gaskin, Ina May's Guide to Childbirth, pp. 150-66.
95. I. Senden et al., "Labor Pain: A Comparison of Parturients in a Dutch and an American Teaching Hospital," Obstetrics and Gynecology 71 (1988): 4.
96. B. Jordon, Birth in Four Cultures: A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, and the United States (Montreal: Eden Press, 1983).
97. Gaskin, Ina May's Guide to Childbirth, pp. 150-53.
98. Goer, Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth, pp. 125-48.
99. E. Lieberman and C. O'Donoghue, "Unintended Effects of Epidural Anesthesia during Labor," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 186 (2002): 531-68.
100. L. Mayberry and D. Clemmens, "Epidural Analgesia Side Effects, Co-interventions, and Care of Women during Childbirth," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 186 (2002): 581-93.
101. Goer, Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth, pp. 125-47, 264-76.
102. Lieberman et al., "Changes in Fetal Position during Labor and Their Association with Epidural Analgesia," Obstetrics and Gynecology 105, no. 5, part 1 (2005): 974.
103. D. Chestnut et al., "The Influence of Continuous Epidural Bupivacaine Analgesia on the Second Stage of Labor and Methods of Delivery in Nulliparous Women," Anesthesiology 66 (1987): 774-80.
104. C. Stavrou, G. J. Hofmeyr, and A. P. Boezaart, "Prolonged Fetal Bradycardia during Epidural Anesthesia: Incidence, Timing and Significance," South Africa Medical Journal 77 (1990): 66-68.
105. R. Steiger and M. P. Nageotte, "Effects of Uterine Contractility and Maternal Hypotension on Prolonged Decelerations after Bupivacaine Epidural Anesthesia," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 163 (1990): 808-12.
106. J. Eddleston et al., "Comparison of the Maternal and Fetal Effects Associated with Intermittent or Continuous Infusion of Extradural Analgesia," British Journal of Anaesthesia 69 (1992): 154-58.
107. C. M. Sepkoski et al., "The Effects of Maternal Epidural Anesthesia on Neonatal Behavior during the First Month," Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 34 (1992): 1072-80.
108. Goer, Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth, p. 271.
109. S. Boschert, "Anesthesiologists Defend Epidural Safety," Ob.Gyn. News, July 15, 1998, p. 20.
110. M. Wagner, "Episiotomy: A Form of Genital Mutilation," Lancet 353 (1999): 1977-78.
111. M. Chase, "Episiotomy, Once Routine, May Not Ease Delivery and Can Slow Recovery," Wall Street Journal, March 30, 2000, p. A1.
112. S. Thacker and D. Banta, "Benefits and Risks of Episiotomy: An Interpretive Review of the English Language Literature, 1860-1980," Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 38 (1983): 322-38.
113. World Health Organization, "Appropriate Technology for Birth."
114. Chase, "Episiotomy."
115. L. Tarkan, "In Many Delivery Rooms, a Routine Becomes Less Routine," New York Times, February 26, 2002.
116. Listening to Mothers (New York: Maternity Center Association, 2002).
117. B. Jacobson et al., "Opiate Addiction in Adult Offspring through Possible Imprinting after Obstetric Treatment," British Medical Journal 301, no. 6760 (1990): 1067-70.
118. K. Nyberg, "Long-Term Effects of Labor Analgesia," Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 29, no. 3 (2000): 226.
119. Wagner, Pursuing the Birth Machine, pp. 86-92.
120. K. Salvesen et al., "Routine Ultrasonography in Utero and Subsequent Handedness and Neurological Development," British Medical Journal 307 (1993): 159-64.
121. A. Saari-Kemppainen et al., "Ultrasound Screening and Perinatal Mortality," Lancet 336 (1990): 387-91.
122. J. Newnham et al., "Effects of Frequent Ultrasound during Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Lancet 342 (1993): 887-91.
123. B. Ewigman, "Effect of Prenatal Ultrasound on Perinatal Outcome," New England Journal of Medicine 329 (1993): 821-27.
124. Newnham et al., "Effects of Frequent Ultrasound during Pregnancy."
125. H. B. Meire, "The Safety of Diagnostic Ultrasound," British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 94 (1987): 1121-22.
126. R. Salmond, "The Uses and Value of Radiology in Obstetrics," in Antenatal and Postnatal Care, ed. F. Browne, 2nd ed. (London: J. and A. Churchill, 1937).
127. J. C. Moir, "The Uses and Value of Radiology in Obstetrics," in Antenatal and Postnatal Care, ed. F. Browne, 9th ed. (London: J. and A. Churchill, 1960).
128. A. Stewart et al., "Malignant Disease in Childhood and Diagnostic Irradiation in Utero," Lancet 2 (1956): 447.
129. Lancet 366, no. 9482 (July 23, 2005): 283.
130. OPRR, Guide to Good Clinical Practice, vol. 3, no. 6, which can be accessed at www.nih.gov.
131. D. Zuckerman, "Hype in Health Reporting," Extra (the magazine of FAIR, the media watchdog group) 15, no. 4 (2004): 8-11.
132. Enkin et al., Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, pp. 487- 507.
133. D. Petiti et al., "In-Hospital Maternal Mortality in the US," Obstetrics and Gynecology 59 (1982): 6-11.
134. D. Petiti et al., "Maternal Mortality and Morbidity in Cesarean Section," Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynecology 28 (2001): 763-68.
135. Wagner, "Choosing Cesarean Section."
136. International Herald Tribune, October 22, 2002.
137. Food and Drug Administration, Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) Data Base, reported on February 21, 2005.
138. F. G. Cunningham et al., Williams Obstetrics, 21st ed. (New York: McGraw- Hill, 2001), p. 447.
139. Cunningham et al., Williams Obstetrics, p. 447.
140. Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Review in Massachusetts: A Bulletin for Health Care Professionals, no. 1, May 2000.
141. W. Rayburn and K. Farmer, "Off Label Prescribing during Pregnancy" Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 24, no. 3 (1997): 471-78.
142. L. Sanchos-Ramos et al., "Labor Induction with the Prostaglandin 1 Methyl Analogue Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin: A Randomized Trial," Obstetrics and Gynecology 91, no. 13 (1993): 401-5.
143. D. Wing and R. Paul, "A Comparison of Differing Dosing Regimens of Vaginally Administered Misoprostol for Preinduction Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 179, no. 1 (1996): 158-64.
144. G. J. Hofmeyr, "Misoprostol Administered Vaginally for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction with a Viable Fetus," Cochrane Library, 2, 1999 (Oxford: Update Software).
145. www .cdc.gov/nchs/birth.
146. Maternity Center Association (now called Childbirth Connection), 281 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10010.
147. D. Wing et al., "Disruption of Prior Uterine Incision Following Misoprostol (Cytotec) for Labor Induction in Women with Previous Cesarean Section," Obstetrics and Gynecology 91, no. 2 (1998): 828-30.
148. Goldberg, A. B., M. B. Greenberg, and P. D. Darney, "Drug Therapy: Misoprostol and Pregnancy," New England Journal of Medicine 344, no. 1 (2001): 38-47.
149. Dateline NBC, November 4, 2001.
150. ACOG Practice Bulletin number 10, "Induction of Labor," November 1999.
151. G. J.. Hofmeyr and A. M. Gulmezoglu, "Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labour (Review)," Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, 2003, art. no. CD000941.
152. Goldberg, Greenberg, and Darney, "Drug Therapy: Misoprostol and Pregnancy."
153. J. Tickner, C. Raffensperger, and N. Myers, The Precautionary Principle in Action: A Handbook, Science and Environmental Health Network, posted at www.biotech-info.net/precautionary.
154. P. Saunders, "Use and Abuse of the Precautionary Principle," submission to U.S. Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy, biotech working group, July 13, 2000, posted on the Web site of the Institute of Science in Society, www.i-sis.org.
155. L. Sanchos-Ramos et al., "Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: A Meta-Analysis," Obstetrics and Gynecology 89 (1997): 633-42.
156. Sanchos-Ramos et al., "Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction," p. 640.
157. R. Hale and S. Zinberg, "Use of Misoprostol in Pregnancy," New England Journal of Medicine 344, no. 1 (2001): 59-60.
158. www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/misoprostol.
159. M. Wagner, "Adverse Events Following Misoprostol Induction of Labor," Midwifery Today 71 (Autumn 2004): 9-12.
160. M. Enkin et al., A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 375.
161. G. Hart, "Induction and Circular Logic," Midwifery Today 63 (Autumn 2002): 24.
162. L. Sanchez-Ramos et al., "Expectant Management versus Labor Induction for Suspected Fetal Macrosomia: A Systematic Review," Obstetrics and Gynecology 100, no. 5, part 1 (2002): 997.
163. Wilkes et al., "Premature Rupture of Membranes" (2004), posted on www .emedicine.com; M. Hannah et al., "Induction of Labor Compared with Expectant Management for Prelabor Rupture of the Membranes at Term," New England Journal of Medicine 334, no. 16 (1996): 1005.
164. J. McClure-Brown, "Postmaturity," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 85 (1963): 573-82.
165. R. L. Williams et al., "Fetal Growth and Perinatal Viability in California," Obstetrics and Gynecology 59 (1982): 624.
166. P. Bergsjo et al., "Comparison of Induced vs. Non-induced Labor in Post-term Pregnancy," Acta Obstetrica Gynecologica 68 (1989): 683-87.
167. D. Weinstein et al., "Expectant Management of Post Term Pregnancy: Observations and Outcome," Journal of Maternal Fetal Medicine 5, no. 5 (1996): 293-97.
168. www .cdc.gov/nchs/birth.
169. Dateline NBC, November 4, 2001.
170. Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC), The National, October 2002.
171. CBS Boston affiliate evening news segment, 2005.
172. I. M. Gaskin, Ina May's Guide to Natural Childbirth (New York: Bantam Books, 2003), pp. 280-84.
173. H. Goer, Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth (New York: Penguin Putnam, 1999), pp. 60-65.
174. "Cytotec: Dangerous Experiment or Panacea?" posted on www.salon.com, July 11, 2000.
175. P. Stephenson and M. Wagner, Tough Choices: In Vitro Fertilization and the Reproductive Technologies (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993).
176. J. Rooks, Midwifery and Childbirth in America (Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1997).
177. E. Declercq, "The Trials of Hanna Porn: The Campaign to Abolish Midwifery in Massachusetts," American Journal of Public Health 84, no. 6 (1994): 1022-28.
178. J. van Olphen-Fehr, Diary of a Midwife: The Power of Positive Childbearing (Westport, Conn.: Bergin & Garvey, 1998).
179. P. Vincent, Baby Catcher: Chronicles of a Modern Midwife (New York: Scribner, 2002).
180. www.motherfriendly.org.
181. E. J. Lehrman, "Nurse-Midwifery Practice: A Descriptive Study of Prenatal Care," Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 26, no. 3 (1981): 27-41.
182. Lehrman, "Nurse-Midwifery Practice".
183. B. K. Cypress, Office Visits by Women: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (Hyattsville, Md.: National Center for Health Statistics, 1980).
184. M. MacDorman and G. Singh, "Midwifery Care, Social and Medical Risk Factors, and Birth Outcomes in the USA," Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 52, no. 5 (1998): 310-17.
185. M. Wagner, "Midwifery in the Industrialized World," Journal of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada 20, no. 13 (1998): 1225-34.
186. M. Wagner, Pursuing the Birth Machine: The Search for Appropriate Birth Technology (London: ACE Graphics, 1994), pp. 150-53.
187. Maternity Center Association (now called Childbirth Connection), 281 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10010. www .childbirthconnection.org.
188. Wagner, "Midwifery in the Industrialized World."
189. www.cdc.gov/nchs.
190. Doulas of North America (DONA) at www .dona.org.
191. D. Korte, "Midwives on Trial," Mothering, Fall 1995, p. 54.
192. ACOG Statement of Policy, "Lay Midwifery," February 2006.
193. Wagner, "Global Witch Hunt."
194. W. H. Pearse, past president of ACOG, wrote in the ACOG publication Obstetrics and Gynecology News 1, no. 1 (1977).
195. P. Warrick, "Midwives to Leave Home: Denied Malpractice Insurance, Women Who Assist Home Births Face Two Choices: Go Establishment, or Go Underground," Los Angeles Times, April 28, 1992).
196. G. Judson, "An American Midwife on Trial: With Less Footing Than a Stork, She Fights to Deliver in the Home," New York Times, November 4, 1995.
197. Van Olphen-Fehr, Diary of a Midwife, pp. 8, 218.
198. D. Korte, "Midwives on Trial," Mothering, Fall 1995, pp. 53-59.
199. J. Mitford, "Teach Midwifery, Go to Jail," San Francisco Chronicle, October 21, 1990.
200. ACOG Statement of Policy as issued by the Executive Board, May 1975.
201. C. Burnett et al., "Home Delivery and Neonatal Mortality in North Carolina," Journal of the American Medical Association 244 (1980): 2741-45.
202. S. J. Meyers et al., "Unlicensed Midwifery Practice in Washington State," American Journal of Public Health 80 (1990): 726-28.
203. ACOG, Guidelines for Perinatal Care (Washington, D.C.: ACOG, 2002), pp. 125-26.
204. R. S. McElvaine, Eve's Seed: Biology, the Sexes, and the Course of History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001).
205. McElvaine, Eve's Seed.
206. J. P. Rooks et al., "Outcomes of Care in Birth Centers: The National Birth Center Study," New England Journal of Medicine 321, no. 26 (1989): 1804-11.
207. E. Feldman and M. Hurst, "Outcomes and Procedures in Low Risk Births: A Comparison of Hospital and Birth Centre Settings," Birth and Family Journal 14, no. 1 (1987): 7-10.
208. G. Baruffi et al., "Investigation of Institutional Differences in Primary Cesarean Birth Rates," Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 35, no. 35 (1990): 274-81.
209. U. Waldenstrom and C. Nilsson, "Women's Satisfaction with Birth Centre Care: A Randomized Controlled Study," Issues in Perinatal Care 20, no. 1 (1993): 3-13.
210. Stephenson et al., Alternative Birth Centers in Illinois.
211. G. Judson, "An American Midwife on Trial: With Less Footing Than a Stork, She Fights to Deliver in the Home," New York Times, November 4, 1995.
212. A. Durand, "The Safety of Home Birth: The Farm Study," American Journal of Public Health 82 (1992): 450-53.
213. W. Schramm et al., "Neonatal Mortality in Missouri Home Births," American Journal of Public Health 77, no. 8 (1987): 930-35.
214. M.W. Hinds, G. H. Bergeisen, and D. T. Allen, "Neonatal Outcome in Planned vs. Unplanned Out-of-Hospital Births in Kentucky," Journal of the American Medical Association 253, no. 11 (1985): 1578- 82.
215. P. A. Murphy and J. Fullerton, "Outcomes of Intended Home Births in Nurse-Midwifery Practice: A Prospective Descriptive Study," Obstetrics and Gynecology 92, no. 3 (1992): 461-70.
216. O. Olsen, "Meta-Analysis of the Safety of Home Birth," Birth 24, no. 1 (1997): 4-16.
217. J. Pang et al., "Outcomes of Planned Home Births in Washington State: 1989-1996," Obstetrics and Gynecology 100, no. 2 (2002): 253-59.
218. Pang et al., "Outcomes of Planned Home Births in Washington," p. 257.
219. Meyers et al., "Unlicensed Midwifery Practice in Washington State."
220. Pang et al., "Outcomes of Planned Home Births in Washington," p. 257.
221. Burnett et al., "Home Delivery and Neonatal Mortality in North Carolina."
222. L. Cawthon, Planned Home Births: Outcomes among Medicaid Women in Washington State, Report 7.93 (Olympia, Wash.: Office of Research and Data Analysis, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, 1996).
223. Pang et al., "Outcomes of Planned Home Births in Washington State," p. 255.
224. O. Olsen, "Meta-Analysis of the Safety of Home Birth."
225. Pang et al., "Outcomes of Planned Home Births in Washington State," p. 259.
226. New York Times, reprinted in the International Herald Tribune, October 3, 2002.
227. K. Johnson and B. Daviss, "A Prospective Study of Planned Home Births by Certified Professional Midwives in North America," British Medical Journal 330, no. 7505 (2005): 1416.
228. J. P. Bruner, S. B. Drummond, A. L. Meenan, and I. M Gaskin, "All-Fours Maneuver for Reducing Shoulder Dystocia during Labor," Journal of Reproductive Medicine 43 (1998): 439-43.
229. W. H. Pearse, past president of ACOG, wrote in the ACOG publication Obstetrics and Gynecology News 1, no. 1 (1977).
230. P. Warrick, "Midwives to Leave Home: Denied Malpractice Insurance, Women Who Assist Home Births Face Two Choices: Go Establishment, or Go Underground," Los Angeles Times, April 28, 1992).
231. J. van Olphen-Fehr, Diary of a Midwife: The Power of Positive Childbearing (Westport, Conn.: Bergin & Garvey, 1998), p. 116.
232. P. Vincent, Baby Catcher: Chronicles of a Modern Midwife (New York: Scribner, 2002).
233. Van Olphen-Fehr, Diary of a Midwife, pp. 155-62.
234. ACOG news release, "Home Births Double Risk of Newborn Death," July 31, 2002.
235. Reuters News Service, "Neonates More Likely to Die If Born at Home or If Home Delivery Was Attempted," August 2, 2002.
236. John O'Neil, "Vital Signs: At Risk, Weighing Odds and Babies," New York Times, August 6, 2002.
237. Johnson and Daviss, "Prospective Study of Planned Home Births with Certified Professional Midwives," posted at www.bmj .com.
238. Web site www.cdc.gov/nchs.
239. ACOG news release, "Nation's Obstetrical Care Endangered by Growing Liability Insurance Crisis," May 6, 2002.
240. ACOG news release, "Nation's Obstetrical Care Endangered by Growing Liability Insurance Crisis."
241. P. E. Steiner and C. C. Lushbaugh, "Maternal Pulmonary Embolism by Amniotic Fluid as a Cause of Obstetric Shock and Unexpected Deaths in Obstetrics," Journal of the American Medical Association 117 (1941): 1245-54, 1341-45.
242. T. Chard and M. Richards, Benefits and Hazards of the New Obstetrics (London: Heinemann, 1977).
243. F. Geoghegan and M. O'Driscoll, "Amniotic Fluid Embolism," Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire 71 (1964): 673.
244. M. Gregory and E. Clayton, "Amniotic Fluid Embolism," Obstetrics and Gynecology 42 (1973): 236.
245. M. Morgan, "Amniotic Fluid Embolism," Anaesthesia 34 (1979): 20-32.
246. S. Clark, "New Concepts of Amniotic Fluid Embolism: A Review," Obstetric and Gynecology Survey 45 (1990): 360-68.
247. ACOG, Prolog: Obstetrics, 3rd ed. (Washington, D.C.: ACOG, 1993), p. 94.
248. M. Wagner, "Off-Label Use of Drugs in Obstetrics-A Cautionary Tale," British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 112 (2005): 266-68.
249. S. L. Clark et al., "Amniotic Fluid Embolism: Analysis of the National Registry," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 172 (1995): 1158-67.
250. F. Cunningham et al., Williams Obstetrics, 20th ed. (Stamford, Conn.: Appleton & Lange, 1997).
251. Cunningham et al., Williams Obstetrics, p. 792.
252. ACOG, Prolog: Obstetrics, 4th ed. (Washington, D.C.: ACOG, 1998), p. 99.
253. R.W. Martin, "Amniotic Fluid Embolism," Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 39 (1996): 101-6.
254. ACOG Practice Bulletin number 10, "Induction of Labor," November 1999.
255. D. Wing and R. A. Paul, "A Comparison of Differing Dosing Regimes of Vaginally Administered Misoprostol for Preinduction Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 175 (1996): 158-64.
256. Wagner, "Adverse Events Following Misoprostol Induction of Labor".
257. www.fda.gov/medwatch.
258. www.pfizer.com.
259. M. Friedman, "(Searle) Manufacturer's Warning Regarding Unapproved Uses of Misoprostol," New England Journal of Medicine 344 (2001): 61.
260. M. Wagner, "From Caution to Certainty: Hazards in the Formation of Evidence- Based Practice. A Case Study on Evidence for an Association between the Use of Uterine Stimulant Drugs and Amniotic Fluid Embolism," Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 19, no. 2 (2005): 173-76.
261. M. Kramer et al., "Amniotic Fluid Embolism and Medical Induction of Labor," accepted for publication in The Lancet.
262. S. Daniels and L. Andrews, "The Shadow of the Law: Jury Decisions in Obstetrics and Gynecology Cases," in Medical Professional Liability and the Delivery of Obstetrical Care, ed. V. P. Rostow and R. J. Bulger (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1989), 2:161-93.
263. B. Sachs, M. Castro, and F. Frigoletto, "The Risks of Lowering the Cesarean- Delivery Rate," New England Journal of Medicine 340, no. 1 (1999): 54-57.
264. Sachs, Castro, and Frigoletto, "Risks of Lowering the Cesarean-Delivery Rate."
265. ACOG news releases: "ACOG Statement on Senate Failure to Pass Liability Reform," April 7, 2004.
266. "Medical Liability Pressures Hurt Career Satisfaction among Ob-Gyns," April 30, 2004.
267. "Medical Liability Survey Reaffirms More Ob/Gyns Are Quitting Obstetrics," July 16, 2004.
268. "ACOG's Red Alert on Ob/Gyn Care Reaches 23 States," August 26, 2004
269. "Statement Regarding Medical Liability Reform by ACOG President," March 15, 2005.
270. "ACOG Endorses Bipartisan Legislation, 'Fair and Reliable Medical Justice Act,'" July 1, 2005.
271. "Wisconsin Supreme Court Ruling Eliminating Caps on Non-economic Damages Will Have Devastating Consequences," July 14, 2005.
272. "Statement of ACOG on the State of the Union Address," February 1, 2006.
273. P. Baker, "Bush Campaigns to Curb Lawsuits: President Says 'Junk' Litigation Is Driving Small-Town Doctors Out of Business," Washington Post, January 6, 2005.
274. J. Queenam, "Professional Liability: Our Role and Responsibility," Obstetrics and Gynecology 100, no. 2 (2002): 217-18.
275. ACOG news release, "Medical Liability Survey Reaffirms More Ob/Gyns Are Quitting Obstetrics."
276. ACOG news release, "ACOG news release, "Statement of ACOG on the State of the Union Address."
277. Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), "Safe Motherhood: Preventing Pregnancy-Related Illness and Death," Obstetrics and Gynecology 88 (2001): 61-67.
278. M. McCarthy, "US Maternal Death Rates Are on the Rise," Lancet 348 (1996): 394.
279. G. L. Rubin et al., "Maternal Death after Cesarean Section in Georgia," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 139 (1981): 681-85.
280. ACOG editorial, "Use of Misoprostol in Pregnancy," New England Journal of Medicine 344, no. 1 (2001): 59-60.
281. K. Prown, "Childbirth and the Law," posted at www.birthpolicy.org.
282. www.dgcenter.org/acp/pdf/psda.pdf.
283. www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/consumer/patient/patient.htm.
284. www.forensic-sych.com/articles/artmedmal.html.
285. K. Prown, "Childbirth and the Law," posted at www.birthpolicy.org.
286. ACOG, "Ethical Principles" section of "Surgery and Patient Choice," in Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2nd ed. (Washington, D.C.: ACOG, 2004), posted at www.acog.org/from_home/publications/ethics/.
287. ACOG Committee Opinion number 306, "Informed Refusal," Obstetrics and Gynecology 104 (2004): 1465-66, available for download (for a fee) at www.greenjournal.org/cgi/reprint/104/6/1465.
288. "Jehovah's Witnesses, Pregnancy, and Blood Transfusions: A Paradigm for the Autonomy Rights of All Pregnant Women," posted at www.aslme.org/ aslmesecure/shop/show_product.php?prod_id = 500.
289. ACOG news release, "Nation's Obstetrical Care Endangered by Growing Liability Insurance Crisis."
290. www.motherfriendly.org.
291. E. K. Adams et al., "Transitions in Insurance Coverage from before Pregnancy through Delivery in Nine States," Health Affairs Journal 22, no. 1 (2003): 219-29.
292. www.cdc.gov/nchs.
293. A. Enthoven, "Employment-Based Health Insurance Is Failing: Now What?" Health Affairs Journal,Web exclusive, May 28, 2003.
294. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), "Safe Motherhood: Preventing Pregnancy- Related Illness and Death," Obstetrics and Gynecology 88 (2001): 61- 67.
295. M. McCarthy, "US Maternal Death Rates Are on the Rise," Lancet 348 (1996): 394.
296. G. L. Rubin et al., "Maternal Death after Cesarean Section in Georgia," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 139 (1981): 681- 85.
297. www.fda.gov.
298. U. Reinhardt et al., "U.S. Health Care Spending in an International Context," Health Affairs Journal 23, no. 3 (2004): 10-25.
299. G. Anderson et al., "It's the Price, Stupid: Why the United States Is So Different from Other Countries," Health Affairs Journal 22, no. 3 (2003): 89-105.
300. www.cdc.gov; www.nih.gov.
301. www.who.int/reproductive-health.
302. Anderson et al., "It's the Price, Stupid."
303. R. Lu and W. Hsiao, "Does Universal Health Insurance Make Health Care Unaffordable? Lesson from Taiwan," Health Affairs Journal 22, no. 3 (2003): 77-88.
304. P. Krugman, "First, Do More Harm" (op-ed), New York Times, January 16, 2006.
305. Meador v. Stahler and Gheridian.
306. www.cdc.gov. Click on HAI.
307. Wagner, "Choosing Caesarian Section."
308. www.cdc.gov. Click on MRSA.
309. A. d'Oliveria et al., "Violence against Women in Health-Care Institutions: An Emerging Problem," Lancet 359 (2002): 1681-85.
310. D'Oliveria et al., "Violence against Women in Health-Care Institutions," p. 1683.
311. Personal communication, Rudy Fedrizzi, M.D., and Heidi Rinehart, M.D., obdocs@bellsouth.net.
312. A. M. Durand, "The Safety of Home Birth: The Farm Study," American Journal of Public Health 82 (1992): 450-53.
313. B. Starfield et al., "The Effects of Specialist Supply on Population's Health: Assessing the Evidence," Health Affairs Journal, Web exclusive, March 15, 2005.
314. J. Queenan, "Professional Liability: Our Role and Responsibility," Obstetrics and Gynecology 100, no. 2 (2002): 217-18.
315. "History Information" on the Web site of the Frontier Nursing Service, at www. frontiernursing.org/history/history.shtm.
316. J. P. Bruner, S. B. Drummond, A. L. Meenan, and I. M Gaskin, "All-Fours Maneuver for Reducing Shoulder Dystocia during Labor," Journal of Reproductive Medicine 43 (1998): 439-43.
317. www.who.int/reproductive-health.
318. P. Krugman, "Pride, Prejudice, Insurance," originally an op-ed piece in the New York Times, reproduced in the International Herald Tribune, November 8, 2005; www.cdc.gov/nchs.
319. A. Betran et al., "Rates of Caesarean Section: Analysis of Global and Regional Estimates and Correlation with Indicators of Reproductive Health System Development," paper presented at the International Forum on Birth, Rome, June 2005, and accepted for publication in Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology.
320. D. Rattner, "Sobre a hipotese de estabilizacao das taxas de cesarea do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil," Rev. Saude Publica 30, no. 1 (1996): 19-33.
321. Secretariat of Health, Sao Paulo State, Brazil, 1999.
322. M. Wagner, "Fish Can't See Water: The Need to Humanize Birth," International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 75, supplement (2001): s25-37.
323. B. Shields, Down Came the Rain: My Journey through Postpartum Depression (New York: Hyperion, 2005).
324. Tom Cruise interview on Today (NBC), June 25, 2005.
325. B. Shields, "War of Words" (op-ed piece), New York Times, July 1, 2005.
326. Dateline NBC, November 4, 2001.
327. www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/misoprostol.
328. B. Tansey, "Ending the Silence: FDA Moves to Warn Patients of Drug's Possible Side Effects," San Francisco Chronicle, June 9, 2005.
329. D. Goodman, "Forced Labor," Mother Jones, January/February 2001, pp. 17- 19.
330. M. MacDorman and G. Singh, "Midwifery Care, Social and Medical Risk Factors, and Birth Outcomes in the USA," Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 52, no. 5 (1998): 310-17.
331. M. Wagner, "The Public Health versus Clinical Approaches to Maternity Services: The Emperor Has No Clothes," Journal of Public Health Policy 19 (1998): 1, 25-35.
332. www.citizen.org/hrg.
333. www.medicalconsumers.org.
334. www.ican-online.org.
335. T. Parker-Pope, "Growing Number of Physicians Warn of Serious Risks from Vaginal Deliveries," Wall Street Journal, June 4, 2002.
336. "Birth Trauma Is Result of Interfering with Nature," letter to the editor, Wall Street Journal, June 25, 2002.
337. www.cfmidwifery.org.
338. www.icea.org.
339. www.motherfriendly.org.
340. www.childbirthconnection.org.
341. www.childbirthconnection.org.
342. "The Nature and Management of Labor Pain," supplement to American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 186, no. 5, part 2 (2002).
343. Maternity Center Association, What Every Pregnant Woman Needs to Know about Cesarean Section (New York: Maternity Center Association, 2004). See www.childbirthconnection.org.
344. www.childbirthconnection.org.
345. Potter et al., "Unwanted Caesarean Sections among Public and Private Patients in Brazil."
346. www.childbirthconnection.org.
347. www.whiteribbonalliance.org.
348. www.motherfriendly.org.
349. www.babyfriendlyusa.org.
350. Wagner, "Public Health versus Clinical Approaches to Maternity Services."
351. D. Rattner, National Ministry of Health of Brazil, Brasilia.
352. Betran et al., "Rates of Caesarean Section."
353. MacDorman and Singh, "Midwifery Care, Social and Medical Risk Factors, and Birth Outcomes in the USA."
354. K. Johnson and B. Daviss, "A Prospective Study of Planned Home Births with Certified Professional Midwives in North America," British Medical Journal 330, no. 7505 (2005): 1416.
355. J. Pang et al., "Outcomes of Planned Home Births in Washington State: 1989-1996," Gynecology and Obstetrics 100, no. 2 (2002): 253-59.
356. www.midirs.org.
357. M. Wagner, "Whose Data Is It Anyway?" Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2 (1988): 7.