Development of practice guidelines

Lancet

Volumn 355, Issue 9198, 2000, Pages 82-83

  Miller, Juliet ^a   Petrie, James ^a  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NOTE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0034620231     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)90326-4     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Institute of Medicine. Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington DC: National Academic Press, 1992.
2. National Health and Medical Research Council. A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Canberra: NHMRC, 1999.
3. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN guidelines: an introduction to SIGN methodology for the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Edinburgh: SIGN, 1999 ( www.sign.ac.uk ).
4. Leape L.L., Park R.E., Kahan J.P., Brook R.H. Group judgement of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition. Qual Assur Health Care. 4:1992;151-159.
5. Antman E.M., Lau J., Kupelnick B., Mosteller F., Chalmers T.C. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and recommendations of clinical experts: treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 268:1992;240-248.
6. Guyatt G.H., Sackett D.L., Sinclair J.C.et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX: a method for grading health care recommendations. JAMA. 274:1995;1800-1804.
7. The AGREE Collaborative Group. Guideline development in Europe: an international comparison. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (in press).