Evaluation of the Endorsement of the STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA) statement on the reporting quality of published genetic association studies

Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 399-404

  Nedovic, Darko ^a,b   Panic, Nikola ^a,c   Pastorino, Roberta ^a   Ricciardi, Walter ^a   Boccia, Stefania ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NI   (Serbia)

^c University Clinical Hospital Center Dragisa Misovic Dedinje   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Genetic association studies; Genetics and heredity; Quality; STREGA

Indexed keywords

CHECKLIST; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENETICS; HEREDITY; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; STANDARDS;

GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH REPORT;

EID: 84986243890     PISSN: 09175040     EISSN: 13499092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20150173     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Network THGE. HuGE Navigator. The Human Genome Epidemiology Network 2014 [cited 2014 30.04.2014].
2. von Elm E, Egger M. The scandal of poor epidemiological research. BMJ. 2004;329:868-9.
3. Little J, Higgins JP, Ioannidis JP, Moher D, Gagnon F, von Elm E, et al. STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA)-an extension of the STROBE statement. Genet Epidemiol. 2009;33:581-98.
4. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344-9.
5. Moher D, Simera I, Schulz KF, Hoey J, Altman DG. Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research. BMC Med. 2008;6:13.
6. Altman DG, Moher D. [Developing guidelines for reporting healthcare research: scientific rationale and procedures]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:8-13.
7. Pocock SJ, Collier TJ, Dandreo KJ, de Stavola BL, Goldman MB, Kalish LA, et al. Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice. BMJ. 2004;329:883.
8. Gluud LL. Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:493-501.
9. Yesupriya A, Evangelou E, Kavvoura FK, Patsopoulos NA, Clyne M, Walsh MC, et al. Reporting of human genome epidemiology (HuGE) association studies: an empirical assessment. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:31.
10. Rennie D. How to report randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:649.
11. Alvarez F, Meyer N, Gourraud PA, Paul C. CONSORT adoption and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: a systematic analysis in two dermatology journals. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161:1159-65.
12. Han C, Kwak KP, Marks DM, Pae CU, Wu LT, Bhatia KS, et al. The impact of the CONSORT statement on reporting of randomized clinical trials in psychiatry. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30:116-22.
13. Kane RL, Wang J, Garrard J. Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:241-9.
14. Poorolajal J, Cheraghi Z, Irani AD, Rezaeian S. Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement. Epidemiol Health. 2011;33:e2011005.
15. Bastuji-Garin S, Sbidian E, Gaudy-Marqueste C, Ferrat E, Roujeau JC, Richard MA, et al. Impact of STROBE statement publication on quality of observational study reporting: interrupted time series versus before-after analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64733.
16. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
17. Panic N, Leoncini E, de Belvis G, Ricciardi W, Boccia S. Evaluation of the Endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83138.
18. Weiss ST. Association studies in asthma genetics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:2014-5.
19. Crossman D, Watkins H. Jesting Pilate, genetic case-control association studies, and Heart. Heart. 2004;90:831-2.
20. Rebbeck TR, Martínez ME, Sellers TA, Shields PG, Wild CP, Potter JD. Genetic variation and cancer: improving the environment for publication of association studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1985-6.
21. Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI. What makes a good genetic association study? Lancet. 2005;366:1315-23.
22. Manly KF. Reliability of statistical associations between genes and disease. Immunogenetics. 2005;57:549-58.
23. Hall IP, Blakey JD. Genetic association studies in Thorax. Thorax. 2005;60:357-9.
24. Boccia S, De Feo E, Galli P, Gianfagna F, Amore R, Ricciardi G. A systematic review evaluating the methodological aspects of meta-analyses of genetic association studies in cancer research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(11):765-75.