Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative Success in Foot and Ankle Patients

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 911-918

  Ho, Bryant ^a   Houck, Jeff R ^b   Flemister, Adolph S ^a   Ketz, John ^a   Oh, Irvin ^a   Digiovanni, Benedict F ^a   Baumhauer, Judith F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

foot and ankle surgery; patient reported outcomes; predictive outcome; PROMIS; shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ACHILLES DEBRIDEMENT; ACHILLES TENDINITIS; ADULT; ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY; ANKLE INSTABILITY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CURRENT PROCEDURAL TERMINOLOGY; DEBRIDEMENT; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; FLATFOOT CORRECTION; FOLLOW UP; FOOT SURGERY; HALLUX RIGIDUS; HALLUX VALGUS; HALLUX VALGUS CORRECTION; HUMAN; ICD-9; LIGAMENT SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL FUNCTION PAIN INTERFERENCE AND DEPRESSION SCORE; POSTERIOR TIBIAL TENDON DYSFUNCTION; POSTOPERATIVE DEPRESSION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; ANKLE; FOOT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANKLE; FOOT; HUMANS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84986193771     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: 19447876     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1071100716665113     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Beckenkamp PR, Lin CW, Chagpar S, et al.Prognosis of physical function following ankle fracture: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 44 (11): 841-851, B842.
2. Beckenkamp PR, Lin CW, Engelen L, Moseley AM., Reduced physical activity in people following ankle fractures: a longitudinal study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016; 46 (4): 235-242.
3. Berliner JL, Brodke DJ, Chan V, SooHoo NF, Bozic KJ., Can preoperative patient-reported outcome measures be used to predict meaningful improvement in function after TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016.
4. Berliner JL, Brodke DJ, Chan V, SooHoo NF, Bozic KJ., John Charnley Award: preoperative patient-reported outcome measures predict clinically meaningful improvement in function after THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474 (2): 321-329.
5. Choi SW, Schalet B, Cook KF, Cella D., Establishing a common metric for depressive symptoms: linking the BDI-II, CES-D, and PHQ-9 to PROMIS depression. Psychol Assess. 2014; 26 (2): 513-527.
6. Gortmaker S, Hosmer D, Lemeshow S., Applied logistic regression. Contemp Sociol. 1994; 23: 159.
7. Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Brodsky JW, et al.Psychometric comparison of the PROMIS physical function CAT with the FAAM and FFI for measuring patient-reported outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35 (6): 592-599.
8. Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Latt LD, et al.Validation of PROMIS (R) Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471 (11): 3466-3474.
9. Hung M, Franklin JD, Hon SD, et al.Time for a paradigm shift with computerized adaptive testing of general physical function outcomes measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35 (1): 1-7.
10. Hung M, Nickisch F, Beals TC, et al.New paradigm for patient-reported outcomes assessment in foot & ankle research: computerized adaptive testing. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33 (8): 621-626.
11. Hunt KJ, Alexander I, Baumhauer J, et al.The Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Outcomes Research (OFAR) network: feasibility of a multicenter network for patient outcomes assessment in foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35 (9): 847-854.
12. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW., Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003; 41 (5): 582-592.
13. Papuga MO, Beck CA, Kates SL, Schwarz EM, Maloney MD., Validation of GAITRite and PROMIS as high-throughput physical function outcome measures following ACL reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2014; 32 (6): 793-801.
14. Papuga MO, Mesfin A, Molinari R, Rubery PT., Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function and Pain CAT instruments with Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in Spine Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016.
15. Strong B, Ho B, Houck J, et al.t al. Defining standard patient reported outcomes using PROMIS after primary total knee replacement. Paper presented at: Academy Health Annual Research Meeting; 2016; Boston, MA.
16. Wong SE, Zhang AL, Berliner JL, Ma CB, Feeley BT., Preoperative patient-reported scores can predict postoperative outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25 (6): 913-919.
17. Yost KJ, Eton DT, Garcia SF, Cella D., Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64 (5): 507-516.