The Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Outcomes Research (OFAR) Network: Feasibility of a Multicenter Network for Patient Outcomes Assessment in Foot and Ankle

Foot & Ankle International

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 847-854

  Hunt, Kenneth J ^a   Alexander, Ian ^b   Baumhauer, Judith ^c   Brodsky, James ^d   Chiodo, Christopher ^e   Daniels, Timothy ^f   Davis, W Hodges ^g   Deland, Jon ^h   Ellis, Scott ^h   Hung, Man ⁱ   Ishikawa, Susan N ^j   Latt, L Daniel ^k   Phisitkul, Phinit ^l   Soohoo, Nelson Fong ^m   Yang, Arthur ^a   Saltzman, Charles L ⁱ  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^g ORTHOCAROLINA HIP AND KNEE CENTER   (United States)

^h HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^j Campbell Clinic Memphis   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

ankle arthritis; computer adaptive testing; patient reported outcomes; PRO; PROMIS

Indexed keywords

ANKLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT; FOOT DEFORMITIES; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED STATES;

ANKLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOOT; FOOT DEFORMITIES; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84922366364     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1071100714544157     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barske HL, Baumhauer J. Quality of research and level of evidence in foot and ankle publications. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33: 1-6.
2. Broderick JE, Schneider S, Junghaenel DU, Schwartz JE, Stone AA. Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013; 65: 1625-1633.
3. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44: 561-570.
4. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007; 45: S3-S11.
5. Fries J, Rose M, Krishnan E. The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and Internet administration. J Rheumatol. 2011; 38: 1759-1764.
6. Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B. Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011; 13: R147.
7. Glazebrook M, Daniels T, Younger A, et al. Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with end-stage ankle and hip arthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 499-505.
8. Goldberg AJ, Sharp RJ, Cooke P. Ankle replacement: current practice of foot & ankle surgeons in the United Kingdom. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 950-954.
9. Hart DL, Mioduski JE, Stratford PW. Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58: 629-638.
10. Higgins TF, Klatt JB, Beals TC. Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP)—the best available evidence on limb-threatening lower extremity trauma. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010; 41: 233-239.
11. Hsueh IP, Wang WC, Wang CH, et al. A simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement instrument. Phys Ther. 2006; 86: 936-943.
12. Hung M, Clegg DO, Greene T, Saltzman CL. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients. J Orthop Res. 2011; 29: 947-953.
13. Hung M, Nickisch F, Beals TC, Greene T, Clegg DO, Saltzman CL. New paradigm for patient-reported outcomes assessment in foot & ankle research: computerized adaptive testing. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33: 621-626.
14. Hunt K, Hurwit D. Use of patient related outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(16):e118(1-9).
15. Jette AM, Haley SM. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. J Rehabil Med. 2005; 37: 339-345.
16. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26: 968-983.
17. Paxton EW, Inacio M, Slipchenko T, Fithian DC. The Kaiser Permanente national total joint replacement registry. Perm J. 2008; 12: 12-16.
18. Pinsker E, Daniels TR. AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32: 841-842.
19. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 2477-2481.
20. Rankin EA. AJRR: becoming a national US joint registry. Orthopedics. 2013; 36: 175-176.
21. Roder C, Errico TJ, Spivak JM, et al. Hospital for joint diseases participates in international spine registry Spine Tango after successful pilot study. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012; 70: 254-258.
22. Salaffi F, Carotti M, Grassi W. Health-related quality of life in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: comparison of generic and disease-specific instruments. Clin Rheumatol. 2005: 24: 29-37.
23. Saltzman CL, Zimmerman MB, O'Rourke M, Brown TD, Buckwalter JA, Johnston R. Impact of comorbidities on the measurement of health in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 2366-2372.
24. Smith MA, Smith WT. The American Joint Replacement Registry. Orthop Nurs. 2012; 31: 296-299.
25. Wang YC, Hart DL, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. Clinical interpretation of computerized adaptive test outcome measures in patients with foot/ankle impairments. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39: 753-764.
26. Wang YC, Hart DL, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. Clinical interpretation of a lower-extremity functional scale-derived computerized adaptive test. Phys Ther. 2009; 89: 957-968.
27. Zaidi R, Abbassian A, Cro S, et al. Levels of evidence in foot and ankle surgery literature: progress from 2000 to 2010? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 94: e1121-1110.