Tweet sentiment analysis with pronoun choice reveals online community dynamics in response to crisis events

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Volumn 480, Issue , 2017, Pages 345-356

  Shaikh, Samira ^a   Feldman, Laurie Beth ^a   Barach, Eliza ^a   Marzouki, Yousri ^b,c  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b QATAR UNIVERSITY   (Qatar)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Big data; Human factors; Natural language; Sentiment analysis; Social media

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); TERRORISM;

ADVERSE EVENTS; INTERNATIONAL SCALE; NATURAL LANGUAGES; NATURALLY OCCURRING; ON-LINE COMMUNITIES; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA DATUM; TERRORIST ATTACKS;

BIG DATA;

EID: 84986192883     PISSN: 21945357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41636-6_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Aragon, C.R., Chen, N-C., Feldman, L.B., Kroll, J.F.: Emoticon and text production in first and second languages in informal text communication. In: Kennedy, W.G., Agarwal, N., Yang, S.J. (eds.) SBP 2014, LNCS 8393, pp. 217-222 (2014)
2. Barberá, J.T., Jost, J.N., Joshua, T., Richard, B.: Tweeting from left to right: is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychol. Sci. 26(10), 1531-1542 (2015a)
3. Barberá, P., Wang, N., Bonneau, R., Jost, J.T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J.: The critical periphery in the growth of social protests. PLoS ONE 10(11), e0143611 (2015). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143611
4. Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A.B., Kuperman, V.: Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behav. Res. Methods 46, 904-911 (2014)
5. Burns, A., Stieglitz, S.: Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: metrics for tweeting activities. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 16, 91-108 (2013)
6. Chung, C. K., Pennebaker, J. W.: The psychological functions of function words. In: Fiedler, K. (ed.) Social Communication (pp. 343-359). Psychology Press, New York, NY (2007)
7. Dubois, E., Gaffney, D.: The Multiple facets of influence: identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on Twitter. Am. Behav. Sci. 58(10), 1260-1277 (2014)
8. Giglietto, F., Lee, Y.: To be or not to be Charlie: Twitter hashtags as a discourse and couter-doscourse in the aftermath of the 2015 Charlie Hebdo shooting in France. In: 5th Workshop on making sense of Microposts (2015)
9. Gustafsson, S.M., Lindholm, T., Sikstrom, S.: Biases in news media as reflected by personal pronouns in evaluative contexts. Soc. Psychol. 45(2), 103-111 (2013)
10. Stefanone, M.A., Lackaff, D., Rosen, D.: Contingencies of self-worth and socialnetworking-site behavior. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14, 41-49 (2011)
11. Trope, Y., Liberman, N.: Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 117, 440-463 (2010)
12. Warriner, A.B., Kuperman, V., Brysbaert, M.: Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behav. Res. Methods 45, 1191-1207 (2013)
13. Xu, W.W. et al.: Predicting Opinion Leaders in Twitter Activism Networks: The Case of the Wisconsin Recall Election. The American behavioural scientist (2014)