The chairman's statement in Malaysian companies: A test of the obfuscation hypothesis

Asian Review of Accounting

Volumn 14, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 49-65

  Smith, Malcolm ^a   Jamil, Anita ^b   Chik Johari, Yang ^b   Ahmar Ahmad, Syahrul ^b  

^a EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Communication processes; Corporate communications; Malaysia; Narratives; Regulation, Financial performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986169738     PISSN: 13217348     EISSN: 17588863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13217340610729464     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abrahamson, E. and Amir, E. (1996), “The information content of the president's letter to shareholders”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 1157-82.
2. Abrahamson, E. and Park, C. (1994), “Concealment of negative organizational outcomes: an agency theory perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 1302-34.
3. Baker, H.H. III and Kare, D.D. (1992), “Relationship between annual report readability and corporate financial performance”, Management Research News, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 1-4.
4. Bowman, E.H. (1984), “Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk”, Interfaces, Vol. 14, January-February, pp. 61-71.
5. Chang, L.S. and Most, K.S. (1981), “An international comparison of investor uses of financial statements”, International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 19, Fall, pp. 19-27.
6. Clatworthy, M. and Jones, M.J. (2001), “The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 311-26.
7. Cooke, T.E. and Parker, R.H. (1994), Financial Reporting in the West Pacific Rim, Routledge, London.
8. Courtis, J. (1995), “Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 4-17.
9. Courtis, J.K. (1998), “Annual report readability variability: test of the obfuscation hypothesis”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 459-71.
10. Courtis, J.K. (2004), “Corporate report obfuscation: artifact or phenomenon?”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 291-312.
11. Day, J.F. (1986), “The use of annual reports by UK investment analysts”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 16 No. 64, pp. 295-307.
12. Deloitte's Consulting (2003), Bullfighter, Deloitte Touche Tomatsu, Sydney.
13. Flesch, R. (1974), The Art of Readable Writing, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
14. Hassan, S. and Courtis, J.K. (2001), “A comparison of the readability levels of the chairman's address of the Shari'ah Islami'ah approved and non-Shari'ah Islam'ah approved companies”, Accounting, Commerce & Finance: The Islamic Perspective Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 65-97.
15. Healy, P. and Palepu, K. (1993), “The effect of firms' financial disclosure strategies on stock prices”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 7, pp. 1-11.
16. Jones, M.J. (1988), “A longitudinal study of the readability of the chairman's narratives in the corporate reports of a UK company”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 18 No. 72, pp. 297-305.
17. Jones, M.J. (1994), “A comment to contextualize performance and readability: a comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations”, Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 225-30.
18. Jones, M.J. and Shoemaker, P.A. (1994), “Accounting narratives: a review of empirical studies of content and readability”, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 13, pp. 142-84.
19. Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (2001), Practice Note No. 4, Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange, Kuala Lumpur.
20. Lee, T.A. and Tweedie, D.P. (1981), The Institutional Investor and Financial Information, The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW), London.
21. Ross, S.P. (1977), “The determination of financial structure: the incentive signaling approach”, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 23-40.
22. Rutherford, B.A. (2003), “Obfuscation, textual complexity and the role of regulated narrative accounting disclosure in corporate governance”, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 187-210.
23. Saadouni, B. and Simon, J. (2004), “Methods used by Thai and Malaysian security analysts to appraise ordinary shares”, Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 25-56.
24. Saudagaran, S.M. and Diva, J.G. (2000), “The institutional environment of financial reporting regulation in ASEAN”, International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 1-26.
25. Smith, M. (2004), “Financial flatulence”, CPA Journal, February, pp. 50-2.
26. Smith, M. and Taffler, R.J. (1992), “The chairman's statement and corporate financial performance”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 75-90.
27. Smith, M. and Taffler, R.J. (2000), “The chairman's statement: a content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 624-46.
28. Staw, B., McKechnie, P. and Puffer, S. (1983), “The justification of organizational performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, pp. 501-24.
29. Subramanian, R., Insley, R.G. and Blackwell, R.D. (1993), “Performance and readability: a comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporation”, Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 49-61.
30. Sydserff, R. and Weetman, P. (1999), “A texture index for evaluating accounting narratives: an alternative to readability formulas”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 459-88.
31. Watts, R. and Zimmerman, J. (1986), Positive Accounting Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
32. Smith, J. and Smith, N.P. (1971), “Readability: a measure of the performance of the communication function of financial reporting”, Accounting Review, Vol. 46, pp. 552-61.