A texture index for evaluating accounting narratives: An alternative to readability formulas

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 459-488

  Sydserff, Robin ^a   Weetman, Pauline ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Company reports; Language; Narratives

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986038332     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09513579910283503     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ASB (1993), Operating and Financial Review, Statement, Accounting Standards Board.
2. Aerts (1994), “On the use of accounting logic as an explanatory category in narrative accounting disclosures”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 19 Nos. 4/5, pp. 337-53.
3. Allard, L. and Ulatowska, H.K. (1991), “Cohesion in written narrative and procedural discourse of fifth-grade children”, Linguistics and Education, Vol. 3, pp. 63-79.
4. Baker, H.E. and Kare, D.D. (1992), “Relationship between annual report readability and corporate financial performance”, Management Research, Vol. 15, pp. 1-4.
5. Bryan, S.H. (1997), “Incremental information content of required disclosures contained in management discussion and analysis”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 285-301.
6. Cameron, C.A., Lee, K., Webster, S., Munro, K., Hunt, A.K. and Linton, M.J. (1995), “Text cohesion in children's narrative writing”, Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 16, pp. 257-69.
7. Carter, R., Goddard, A., Reah, D., Sanger, K. and Bowring, M. (1997), Working with Texts: A Core Book for Language Analysis, Routledge, London and New York, NY.
8. Courtis, J.K. (1995), “Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 4-17.
9. Courtis, J.K. (1998), “Annual report readability variability: tests of the obfuscation hypothesis”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 459-71.
10. Day, J. (1986), “The use of annual reports by UK investment analysts”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 16 No. 64, pp. 295-307.
11. de Beaugrande, R. and Dressler, W. (1981), Introduction to Text Linguistics, Longman, London and New York, NY.
12. Dreyer, L.G. (1984), “Readability and responsibility”, Journal of Reading, January, pp. 334-8.
13. Fairclough, N. (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis, Longman, London and New York, NY.
14. Giles, T. (1990), “The readability controversy: a technical writing review”, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 131-8.
15. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985), An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Edward Arnold, London.
16. Halliday, M.A.K. (1987), “Spoken and written modes of meaning”, in Horowitz, R. and Samuels, S.J. (Eds.), Comprehending Oral and Written Language, Academic, New York, NY,pp. 55-82.
17. Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1976), Cohesion in English, Longman, London.
18. Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1989), Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Hasan, R. (1984), “Coherence and cohesive harmony”, in Flood, J. (Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension, International Reading Association, Delaware, pp. 189-219.
20. Hatch, E. (1992), Discourse and Language Education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Hoey, M. (1991), Patterns of Lexis in Text, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
22. Holland, J. (1998), “Private voluntary disclosure, financial intermediation and market efficiency”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 25 Nos. 1/2, pp. 29-68.
23. Hopwood, A.G. (1996), “Making visible and the construction of visibilities: shifting agendas in the design of the corporate report: introduction”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 55-6.
24. Jones, M.J. (1988), “A longitudinal study of the readability of the chairman's narratives in the corporate reports of a UK Company”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 18 No. 72, pp. 297-305.
25. Jones, M.J. (1994), “A comment to contextualise ‘performance and readability: a comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations”, Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 225-30.
26. Jones, M.J. (1997), “Methodological themes. Critical appraisal of the cloze procedure's use in the accounting domain”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 105-28.
27. Jones, M.J. and Shoemaker, P.A. (1994), “Accounting narratives: a review of empirical studies of content and readability”, The Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 13, pp. 142-84.
28. Lovejoy, K.B. (1991), “Cohesion and information strategies in academic writing: analysis of passages in three disciplines”, Linguistics and Education, Vol. 3, pp. 315-43.
29. Lovejoy, K.B. and Lance, D.M. (1991), “Information management and cohesion in the study of written discourse”, Linguistics and Education, Vol. 3, pp. 251-73.
30. McCarthy, M. (1991), Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Marston, C.L. and Shrives, P.J. (1991), “The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: a review article”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 23, pp. 195-210.
32. Martindale, B.C., Koch, B.S. and Karlinsky, S.S. (1992), “Tax law complexity: the impact of style”, The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 29 No 4, pp. 383-400.
33. Means, T.L. (1981), “Readability: an evaluation criterion of stockholder reaction to annual reports”, The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 24, pp. 19-27.
34. Neuner, J.L. (1987), “Cohesive ties and chains in good and poor freshmen essays”, Research in the Teaching of English, Vol. 21, pp. 92-102.
35. Nunan, D. (1993), Introducing Discourse Analysis, Penguin Books, London.
36. Peterson, C. and Dodsworth, P. (1991), “A longitudinal analysis of young children's cohesion and noun specification in narratives”, Journal of Child Language, Vol. 18, pp. 397-415.
37. Roseberry, R.L. (1995), “A texture index: measuring texture in discourse”, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 205-23.
38. Schriver, K.A. (1989), “Evaluating text quality: the continuum from text-focused to reader-focused methods”, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 238-55.
39. Scinto, L.F.M. (1984), “The architectonics of text produced by children and the development of higher cognitive functions”, Discourse Processes, Vol. 7, pp. 371-418.
40. Scinto, L.F.M. (1986), Written Language and Psychological Development, Academic, New York, NY.
41. Siegel, S. and Castellan, N.J. (1988), Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
42. Smith, M. and Taffler, R. (1992a), “The chairman's statement and corporate fnancial performance”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 32, pp. 75-90.
43. Smith, M. and Taffler, R. (1992b), “Readability and understandability: different measures of the textual complexity of accounting narrative”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 84-98.
44. Smith, M. and Taffler, R. (1995), “The incremental effect of narrative accounting information in corporate annual reports”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 1195-210.
45. Smith, M. and Taffler, R. (1997), “The president's letter and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy”, Manuscript, City University Business School, London.
46. Stevens, K.T., Stevens, K.C. and Stevens, W.P. (1992), “Measuring the readability of business writing: the cloze procedure versus readability formulas”, The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 29, pp. 367-82.
47. Stoddart, S. (1991), Texts and Texture: Patterns of Cohesion, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
48. Stotsky, S. (1983), “Types of lexical cohesion: implications for developing a vocabulary of academic discourse”, College Composition and Communication, Vol. 37, pp. 276-93.
49. Subramanian, R., Insley, R.G. and Blackwell, R.D. (1993), “Performance and readability: a comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations”, The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 30, pp. 49-61.
50. van Dijk, T. (1988), News as Discourse, Blackwell, Oxford.
51. Virtanen, T. (1992), “Issues of text typology: narrative – a ‘basic’ type of text?”, Text, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 293-310.
52. Weber, R.P. (1990), Basic Content Analysis (2nd ed.), Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-049, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
53. Weetman, P. and Collins, B. (1996), Operating and Financial Review: Experiences and Exploration, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Edinburgh.
54. Weetman, P., Collins, B. and Davie, E. (1994), Operating and Financial Review: Views of Analysts and Institutional Investors, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Edinburgh.
55. Winter, E. (1979), Replacement of a fundamental function of the sentence in context, Forum Linguisticum, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 95-133.
56. Witte, S.P. and Faigley, L. (1981), “Coherence, cohesion and writing quality”, College Composition and Communication, Vol. 32, pp. 189-204.