Stimulating performance-driven behaviour to obtain better results

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 301-316

  de Waal, Andre A ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Behaviour; Performance management; Performance measures

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986146479     PISSN: 17410401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17410400410533890     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ahn, H. (2001), “Applying the balanced scorecard concept: an experience report”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 34, pp. 441-61.
2. American Productivity & Quality Center (1999a), Performance Management: Tapping Your Organization's People Potential, APQC Report, APQC, Houston, TX.
3. American Productivity & Quality Center (1999b), Achieving Organizational Excellence through the Performance Measurement System, APQC Report, APQC, Houston, TX.
4. Ardon, A. (1999), Klantgestuurde Teams, Ontwerp, Besturing en Ontwikkeling, Uitgevery Contact, Amsterdam.
5. Campbell, D., Datar, S., Kulp, S. and Narayanan, V.G. (2002), Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Control System for Monitoring and Revising Corporate Strategy, Harvard NOM Research Paper, No. 02-35, September.
6. Choo, C.W. (2000), “Closing the cognitive gaps: how people process information”, in Marchand, D.A., Davenport, T.H. and Dickson, T. (Eds), Mastering Information Management: Complete MBA Companion in Information Management, Prentice-Hall/Financial Times, Harlow, pp. 245-53.
7. Davenport, T.H. (2000), “Attention: the next information barrier”, in Marchand, D.A., Davenport, T.H. and Dickson, T. (Eds), Mastering Information Management: Complete MBA Companion in Information Management, Prentice-Hall/Financial Times, Harlow, pp. 46-51.
8. de Waal, A.A. (2001), Power of Performance Management: How Leading Companies Create Sustained Value, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
9. de Waal, A.A. (2002), “The role of behavioral factors in the successful implementation and use of performance management systems”, academic dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
10. de Waal, A.A. (2003a), “Behavioral factors important for the successful implementation and use of performance management systems”, Management Decision, Vol. 41 No. 8.
11. de Waal, A.A. (2003b), “Bevorderen van prestatiegericht gedrag”, Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, No. 3.
12. DeBusk, G.K., Brown, R.M. and Killough, L.N. (2003), “Components and relative weights in utilization of dashboard measurement systems like the balanced scorecard”, The Britisch Accounting Review, Vol. 35, pp. 215-31.
13. Economist Intelligence Unit (1994), The New Look of Corporate Performance Measurement, Research Report, Economist Intelligence Unit, London.
14. Euske, K.J., Lebas, M.J. and McNair, C.J. (1993), “Performance management in an international setting”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 4, pp. 275-99.
15. Franco, M. and Bourne, M. (2003), Factors that Play a Role in “Managing through Measures”, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield.
16. Frigo, M. (2000), “Current trends in performance measurement systems”, in Neely, A. (Ed.), Performance Measurement – Past, Present and Future, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield, pp. 153-60.
17. Gelderman, M. (1998), “De mythe van niet-financiële prestatiemeting”, Tijdschrift Controlling, Vol. 12, pp. 34-7.
18. Groot, T.L.C.M., van der Meer-Kooistra, J. and Wouters, M.J.F. (1998), “Dynamiek en dilemma's rond prestatiemeting, van confectie naar maatwerk”, Tijdschrift BedrijfsAdministratie, Vol. 102, pp. 346-9.
19. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
20. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2000), The Strategy-focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
21. Kasurinen, T. (2002), “Exploring management accounting change: the case of balanced scorecard implementation”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 13, pp. 323-43.
22. Krause, O. (2000), “Management knowledge engineering – a toolkit to engineer adaptive management systems”, in Neely, A. (Ed.), Performance Measurement – Past, Present, and Future, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield, pp. 307-14.
23. Lipe, M.G. and Salterio, S.E. (2000), “The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures”, Accounting Review, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 283-98.
24. Malina, M.A. and Selto, F.M. (2000), “Communicating and controlling strategy: an empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard”, paper presented at the AAA Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA, 13-16 August.
25. Marchand, D.A., Davenport, T.H. and Dickson, T. (Eds) (2000), Mastering Information Management: Complete MBA Companion in Information Management, Prentice-Hall/Financial Times, Harlow.
26. Martins, R.A. (2000), “Use of performance measurement systems: some thoughts towards a comprehensive approach”, in Neely, A. (Ed.), Performance Measurement – Past, Present, and Future, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield, pp. 363-70.
27. Massello, C.S. (1999), “How to successfully implement strategic planning”, Journal of Modern Business.
28. Mastenbroek, W.F.G. (1997), Verandermanagement, Holland Business Publications, Heemstede.
29. Merchant, K.A. (1998), Modern Management Control Systems: Text and Cases, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
30. Moon, P. and Fitzgerald, L. (1996), “Delivering the goods at TNT: the role of the performance measurement system”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 7, pp. 431-57.
31. Neely, A. (1998), Measuring Business Performance: Why, What and How, The Economist Books, London.
32. Neely, A. (Ed.) (2000), Performance Measurement – Past, Present, and Future, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield.
33. Neely, A., Gray, D., Kennerly, M. and Marr, B. (2003), Measuring Corporate Management and Leadership Capability, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield.
34. Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R.I. (2000), The Knowing-doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
35. Rigas, J. and Fan, I.S. (2000), “Devising improvement action plans out of performance measurement by an operational model of performance indicators”, in Neely, A. (Ed.), Performance Measurement – Past, Present, and Future, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield, pp. 483-90.
36. Samson, D. and Challis, D. (1999), Patterns of Excellence: The New Principles of Corporate Success, Prentice-Hall/Financial Times, Harlow.
37. Sandt, J., Schaeffer, U. and Weber, J. (2001), “Balanced performance measurement systems and manager satisfaction”, Otto Beisheim Graduate School of Management, Koblenz.
38. Schouten, J. and van Beers, W. (2000), Resultaatgericht Managen, Thema, Zaltbommel.
39. Senge, P.M. (1994), The Fifth Discipline, Currency Doubleday, New York, NY.
40. Simons, R. (1995), Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
41. Simons, R. (2000), Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy: Text and Cases, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
42. Vagneur, K. and Peiperl, M. (2000), “Reconsidering performance evaluative style”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 25.
43. Vosselman, E.G.J. (1999), Accounting en Gedrag: Zichtbare en Onzichtbare Effecten van Management Accounting, Kluwer, Deventer.
44. von Cotta-Schønberg, M. (1995), “Performance measurement in the context of quality management”, key paper presented at the First Northumbria Conference on Performance Measurement.