Research degree examining: Quality issues of principle and practice

Quality Assurance in Education

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 55-63

  Powell, Stuart ^a   Green, Howard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diversity; National curriculum; Qualifications; Research methods; United Kingdom; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986131245     PISSN: 09684883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09684880310471470     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. CVCP (1993), Handbook for External Examiners in Higher Education, Universities Staff Development Unit, Sheffield.
2. Cryer, P. and Mertens, P. (2003), “The PhD examination: Support and training for supervisors and examiners”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 91-98.
3. Delamont, S., Atkinson, P. and Parry, O. (2000), The Doctoral Experience: Success and Failure in Graduate School, Falmer, London.
4. Denicolo, P. (2003), “Assessing the PhD: A constructive view of criteria”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 83-90.
5. Grabbe, L.L. (2003), “The trials of being a PhD external examiner”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 127-32.
6. Hartley, J. and Jory, S. (2000), ’‘Lifting the veil on the viva: The experiences of psychology PhD candidates in the UK”, Psychology Teaching Review, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 76-90.
7. HEFCE (2003), “Improving standards in postgraduate research degree programmes”, HEFCE, informal consultation, London.
8. Jackson, C. and Tinkler, P. (2000), “Examining the doctorate: Institutional policy and the PhD examination process in Britain”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 167-80.
9. Jackson, C. and Tinkler, P. (2001), “Back to basics: A consideration of the purposes of the PhD viva”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 351-62.
10. Johnston, S. (1997), “Examining the examiners: An analysis of examiners’ reports on doctoral theses”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 333-48.
11. Joyner, R.W. (2003), “The selection for external examiners for research degrees”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 122-6.
12. Mertens, P. (2001), ’‘Training and accreditation programme for postgraduate supervisors (TAPPS)”, BBSRC Business, April.
13. Morley, L., Leonard, D. and David, M. (2002), “Variations in vivas: Quality and equality in British PhD assessments”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 263-73.
14. Morley, L., Leonard, D. and David, M. (2003), “Quality and equality in British PhD assessment”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 63-71.
15. Murray, R. (2003), “Student questions and their implications for the viva”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 108-12.
16. Powell, S.D. and McCauley, C. (2002), “Research degree examining – common principles and divergent practices”, Quality Assurance in Education (Special Edition “Standards and the Doctoral Award”), Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 104-16.
17. Powell, S.D. and McCauley, C. (2003), “The process of examining research degrees: Some issues of quality”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 72-82.
18. QAA (1999), Code of Practice for the Assurance of Academic Quality and Standards in Higher Education: Postgraduate Research Programmes, QAA, London.
19. QAA (2000), Code of Practice for the Assurance of Academic Quality and Standards in Higher Education: Assessment of Students, QAA, London.
20. Taylor, L. (2001), Times Higher Education Supplement, 23 March.
21. Trafford, V. (2003), “Questions in doctoral vivas: Views from the inside”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 113-21.
22. Trafford, V.N. and Leshem, S. (2002a), “Starting at the end to undertake doctoral research: Predictable questions as stepping stones”, Higher Education Review, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 43-61.
23. Trafford, V.N. and Leshem, S. (2002b), “Anatomy of a doctoral viva”, Journal of Graduate Education, Vol. 3, pp. 33-41.
24. UCoSDA/BPS (1995), Guidelines for the Assessment of the PhD in Psychology and Related Disciplines, Universities’ and Colleges’ Staff Development Agency, Sheffield.
25. Wallace, S. (2003), “Figuratively speaking: Six accounts of the PhD viva”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 99-107.