Toward a framework for action research in information systems studies

Information Technology & People

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 148-176

  Lau, Francis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Action research; Assessment; Information systems; Methodology; Quality; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986083413     PISSN: 09593845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09593849910267206     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Argyris, C., Putnam, R. and Smith, D.M. (1985), Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
2. Argyris, C. and Schon, D.A. (1989), “Participatory action research and action science compared”, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 612-23.
3. Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M. and Nielsen, P.A. (1998), “Making academic research more relevant”, Communications of ACM.
4. Baburoglu, O.N. and Ravn, I. (1992), “Normative action research”, Organization Studies, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 19-34.
5. Badham, R., Couchman, P. and Little, S. (1995), “Getting smart: developing an action research approach to the integrated management of technical and organizational innovation”, Human Systems Management, Vol. 14, pp. 91-104.
6. Banville, C. and Landry, M. (1989), “Can the field of MIS be disciplined”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 48-60.
7. Baskerville, R. (1993), “Semantic database prototypes”, Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 119-44.
8. Baskerville, R.L. and Stage, J. (1996), “Controlling prototype development through risk analysis”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 481-501.
9. Baskerville, R.L. and Wood-Harper, T. (1996), “A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research”, Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 11, pp. 235-46.
10. Baskerville, R.L. and Wood-Harper, T. (1998), “Diversity in information systems action research methods”, European Journal of Information Systems.
11. Baskerville, R., Myers, M., Nielsen, P.A. and Wood-Harper, T. (1997), “Panel – the impact of action research on information systems”, in Lee, A., Liebenau, J. and DeGross, J. (Eds) Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Chapman & Hall, London, p. 69.
12. Benbasat, I. (1985), “An analysis of research methodologies”, in MacFarlan, W. (Ed.), The Information Systems Research Challenge, Proceedings of Harvard Business School Colloquium, HBS Press, Boston, MA, pp. 47-85.
13. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K. and Mead, M. (1987), “The case research strategy in studies of information systems”, MIS Quarterly, September, pp. 369-86.
14. Blennerhassett, E. (1988), “Research report: management learning groups – a lesson in action”, Journal of European Information Technology, Vol. 12 No. 8, pp. 5-12.
15. Brown, L.D. and Tandon, R. (1983), “Ideology and political economy in inquiry: action research and participatory research”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 277-94.
16. Brown, L.D. (1993), “Social change through collective reflection with Asian non-governmental development organizations”, Human Relations, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 249-74.
17. Calabrese, A.M. and Acker, S.R. (1987), Information System Design: A Case Study in the Generation of Innovations, Meeting of the Human Communication Technology Interest Group, International Communication Association, Montreal.
18. Candlin, D.B. and Wright, S. (1992), “Managing the introduction of expert systems”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 46-59.
19. Cassell, C., Fitter, M., Fryer, D. and Smith, L. (1988), “The development of computer applications by non-employed people in community settings”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 61, pp. 89-102.
20. Cassell, C. and Fitter, M. (1992), “Responding to a changing environment”, in Hosking, D.M. and Anderson, N. (Eds), Organizational Change and Innovation – Psychological Perspectives and Practices in Europe, Routledge, London, pp. 288-304
21. Checkland, P. (1991), “From framework through experience to learning: the essential nature of action research”, in Nissen, H.E., Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (Eds), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, IFIP, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. North-Holland, pp. 397-403.
22. Chisholm, R.F. and Elden, M. (1993), “Features of emerging action research”, Human Relations, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 275-98.
23. Covaleski, M.A., Dirsmith, M.W. and Jablonsky, S.F. (1985), “Traditional and emergent theories of budgeting: an empirical analysis”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 4, pp. 277-300.
24. Crowther, W. (1985), Considering Complex Objectives and Scarce Resources in Information Systems Analysis, ASIS Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV.
25. de Cock, C. (1994), “Action research: in search of a new epistemology?”, International Journal of Management, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 791-7.
26. Earl, M.J. (1978), “Prototype systems for accounting, information and control”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 161-70.
27. Engelstad, P.H. and Gustavsen, B. (1993), “Swedish network development for implementing national work reform strategy”, Human Relations, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 219-48.
28. Fox, W.M. (1995), “Sociotechnical system principles and guidelines: past and present”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 91-105.
29. French, W.L. and Bell, C.H. and (1990), Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
30. Gibson, C.F. (1975), “A methodology for implementation research”, in Schultz, R.L. and Slevin, D.P. (Eds), Implementing Operations Research/Management Science, American Elsevier Publishing Co., New York, NY, pp. 53-73.
31. Greenwood, D.J., Whyte, W.F. and Harkavy, I. (1993), “Participatory action research as a process and as a goal”, Human Relations, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 174-92.
32. Hamilton, S. and Ives, B. (1982), “MIS research strategies”, Information and Management, Vol. 5, pp. 339-47.
33. Harris, R.T. (1978), “Improving patient satisfaction through action research”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 382-99.
34. Holsapple, C., Johnson, L., Manakyan, H. and Tanner, J. (1994), “Business computing research journals: a normalized citation analysis”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 131-40.
35. Hult, M. and Lennung, S. (1978), “Towards a definition of action research: a note and bibliography”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 241-50.
36. Jonsson, S. (1991), “Action research”, in Nissen, H.E., Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (Eds), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, IFIP, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. Amsterdam, pp. 371-96.
37. Jonsson, S. and Gronlund, A. (1988), “Life with a sub-contractor: new technology and management accounting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 512-32.
38. Jonsson, S. and Solli, R. (1993), “Accounting talk in a caring setting”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 4, pp. 301-20.
39. Keen, P.G.W. (1991), “Relevance and rigor in information systems research: improving quality, confidence, cohesion and impact”, in Nissen, H.E., Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (Eds), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, IFIP, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. North-Holland, pp. 27-49.
40. Kemmis, S. (1988), “Action research”, in Keeves, J.P. (Ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
41. Kemmis, S. and Giovanna, D.C. (1987), “Emerging and evolving issues of action research praxis: an Australian perspective”, Peabody Journal of Education, Vol. 64 No. 3, pp. 101-30.
42. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1998), “A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems”, MIS Quarterly.
43. Kock, N. (1997), “Negotiating mutually satisfying IS action research topics with organizations: an analysis of Rapoport's initiative dilemma”, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 9 No. 7, pp. 253-62.
44. Kock, N. and McQueen, R.J. (1998), “An action research study of effects of asynchronous groupware support on productivity and outcome quality in process redesign groups”, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 149-68.
45. Kock, N.F., McQueen, R.J. and Scott, J.L. (1997), “Can action research be made more rigorous in a positivist sense? The contribution of an iterative approach”, Journal of Systems & Information Technology, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-24.
46. Lacity, M.C. and Janson, M.A. (1994), “Understanding qualitative data: a framework of text analysis methods”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 137-55.
47. Lau, F. (1997), “A review of action research in information systems studies”, in Lee, A., Liebenau, J. and DeGross, J. (Eds), Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 31-68.
48. Laughlin, R.C. (1987), “Accounting systems in organizational contexts: a case for critical theory”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 479-502.
49. Ledford, G.E. and Mohrman, S.A. (1993), “Self-design for high involvement: a large-scale organizational change”, Human Relations, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 143-74.
50. Lee, A., Liebenau, J. and DeGross, J. (Eds) (1997), Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 31-68.
51. Lee, A.S. (1989), “A scientific methodology for MIS case studies”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 33-50.
52. Levine, H.G. and Rossmoore, D. (1993), “Diagnosing the human threats to information technology implementation: a missing factor in systems analysis illustrated in a case study”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 55-73.
53. Levin, M. (1993), “Creating networks for rural economic development in Norway”, Human Relations, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 193-218.
54. Lewin, K. (1974), “Frontiers in group dynamics I. Concepts, method and reality in social sciences: social equilibria and social change”, Human Relations, Vol. 1, pp. 5-41.
55. Liu, M., Denis, H., Kolodny, H. and Stymne, B. (1990), “Organization design for technological change”, Human Relations, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 7-22.
56. Mansell, G. (1991), “Action research in information systems development”, Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 29-40.
57. Markus, M.L. (1994), “Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice”, Organization Science, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 502-27.
58. Markus, M.L. (1997), “The qualitative difference in information systems research and practice”, in Lee, A., Liebenau, J. and DeGross, J. (Eds), Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 11-27.
59. Markus, M.L. and Robey, D. (1988), “Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research”, Management Science, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 583-98.
60. McFarlan, F.W. (Ed.) (1985), The Information Systems Research Challenge, Proceedings of Harvard Business School Colloquium, HBS Press, Boston, MA.
61. McTaggart, R. (1991), “Principles for participatory action research’’, Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 168-87.
62. Mirvis, P.H. and Lawler, E.E. (1983), “Systems are not solutions: issues in creating information systems that account for the human organization”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 8 No. 2/3, pp. 175-90.
63. Mumford, E., Hirschheim, R., Fitzgerald, G. and Wood-Harper, T. (Eds) (1985), Research Methods in Information Systems, Proceedings of IFIP WG 8.2 Colloquium, Manchester, North-Holland.
64. Nissen, H.F., Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (Eds) (1991), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions, IFIP, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. Amsterdam.
65. Ngwenyama, O.K. (1991), “The critical social theory approach to information systems: problems and challenges”, in Nissen, H.E., Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (Eds), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, IFIP, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. Amsterdam, pp. 267-80.
66. Ngwenyama, O.K. (1993), “Developing end-users’ systems development competence – an exploratory study”, Information & Management, Vol. 25, pp. 291-302.
67. Nosek, J.T. and Yaverbaum, G. (1991), “Overcoming obstacles to university and industry synergy in information system education: lessons from action research”, Education for Information, Vol. 9, pp. 3-19.
68. Oakland, J.S. (1986), “Production management and high technology in the United Kingdom”, Engineering Management International, Vol. 3, pp. 269-78.
69. Orlikowski, W.J. (1993), “CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development’’, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 309-40.
70. Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.I. (1991), “Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-28.
71. Pava, C. (1986), “Redesigning sociotechnical systems design: concepts and methods for the 1990s”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 201-21.
72. Peters, M. and Robinson, V. (1984), “The origins and status of action research”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 113-24.
73. Rapoport, R.N. (1970), “Three dilemmas in action research”, Human Relations, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 499-513.
74. Reason, P. (1993), “Three approaches to participative inquiry”, in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, London, pp. 324-39.
75. Revans, R.W. (1980), Action Learning: New Techniques for Management, Blond & Briggs, London.
76. Revans, R.W. (1983a), “Action learning: kindling the touch paper”, Management Decision, Vol. 21, pp. 3-10.
77. Revans, R.W. (1983b), “Action learning: its terms and character”, Management Decision, Vol. 21, pp. 39-50.
78. Revans, R.W. (1983c), “Action learning: the skills of diagnosis”, Management Decision, Vol. 21, pp. 46-54.
79. Rickards, T. (1985), “Making new things happen: an interpretation of observed innovation strategies”, Technovation, Vol. 3, pp. 119-31.
80. Robinson, V.M.J. (1993), “Current controversies in action research”, PAQ, Fall, pp. 263-90.
81. Salmela, H. and Ruohonen, M. (1992), “Aligning DSS development with organization development”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 61, pp. 57-71.
82. Sandberg, A. (1985), “Socio-technical design, trade union strategies and action research”, in Mumford, E. et al. (Eds), Research Methods in Information Systems, IFIP, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. North-Holland, pp. 79-92.
83. Susman, G.I. and Evered, R.D. (1978), “An assessment of the scientific merits of action research”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 582-603.
84. Timpka, T., Sjoberg, C. and Svensson, B. (1995), “The pragmatics of clinical hypermedia: experiences from 5 years of participatory design in the MEDEA project”, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Vol. 46, pp. 175-86.
85. Walsham G. (1993), Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
86. Walsham G. (1995), “The emergence of interpretivism in IS research”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 376-94.
87. Whyte, W.F. (Ed.) (1991), Participatory Action Research, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
88. Wood-Harper, T. (1985), “Research methods in information systems: using action research”, in Mumford, E. et al. (Eds), Research Methods in Information Systems, IFIP, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. North-Holland, pp. 169-91.
89. Wood-Harper, A.T. (1992), “Viewpoint: action research”, Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 2, pp. 235-6.
90. Wood-Harper, A.T. and Flynn, D.J. (1983), “Action learning for teaching information systems”, The Computer Journal, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 79-82.
91. Yin, R.K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, London.
92. Ziegenfuss, J. Jr (1987), “Research information systems are paths to high-quality healthcare”, Health Progress, October, pp. 50-3, 82.