Measurement, management and the digital library

Library Review

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 138-141

  Barton, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Digital libraries; Library management; Performance measures

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986052183     PISSN: 00242535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00242530410526538     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Association of Research Libraries (2003), available at: www.arl.org/stats/ (accessed 20 October 2003).
2. Banwell, L., Day, J. and Ray, K. (1999), “ Managing organisational change in the hybrid library ”, Final Report, 1999, available at: www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/ukoln/hybrid-moc/hybrid.html (accessed 20 October 2003).
3. Barton, J. and Blagden, J. (1998), Academic Library Effectiveness: A Comparative Approach, British Library Research and Innovation Centre, London.
4. COUNTER (2003), available at: www.projectcounter.org/ (accessed 20 October 2003).
5. Creaser, C. (Ed.) (2003), As Others See Us: Benchmarking in Practice, LISU, Loughborough.
6. EQUINOX (2002), available at: http://equinox.dcu.ie/ (accessed 20 October 2003).
7. EVALUEd (2003), available at: www.cie.uce.ac.uk/evalued/ (accessed 20 October 2003).
8. Ford, G. (2002), “ Strategic uses of evaluation and performance measurement ”, Proceedings of the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, 12-16 August 2001, ARL, Washington, DC.
9. George, C. (2002), “ Library web user survey – designing online access ”, Proceedings of the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, 12-16 August 2001, ARL, Washington, DC.
10. Hiller, S. (2002), “ Listening to our library users: 2001 survey results ”, Library Directions, Winter 2002, available at: www.lib.washington.edu/about/libdirections/ldwin02-web2.pdf (accessed 20 October 2003).
11. Hiller, S. (2003), “ But what does it mean? Using statistical data for decision making in academic libraries ”, in Creaser, C. (Ed.), Statistics in Practice – Measuring and Managing, LISU, Loughborough.
12. IFLA Statistics and Evaluation Section (2003), available at: www.ifla.org/VII/s22/ss.htm (accessed 20 October 2003).
13. JUBILEE (2002), available at: http://online.northumbria.ac.uk/faculties/art/information_studies/imri/jubilee/ (accessed 20 October 2003).
14. Lakos, A. (2002), “ Culture of assessment as a catalyst for organizational culture change in libraries ”, Proceedings of the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, 12-16 August 2001, ARL, Washington, DC.
15. LISU (2003), available at: www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/dils/lisu/lisuhp.html (accessed 20 October 2003).
16. Mundt, S. (2002), “ Surveying users of electronic library services by telephone ”, Proceedings of the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, 12-16 August 2001, ARL, Washington, DC.
17. Self, J. and Hiller, S. (2002), “ A decade of user surveys: utilizing and assessing a standard assessment tool to measure library performance at the University of Virginia and University of Washington ”, Proceedings of the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, 12-16 August 2001, ARL, Washington, DC.
18. Stein, J. (2003), “ Measurement-based change in libraries: case studies from an academic library ”, in Creaser, C. (Ed.), Statistics in Practice – Measuring and Managing, LISU, Loughborough.
19. Thebridge, S. et al. (2002), Final analysis of the digital library questionnaire (UK HEIs), Digital Library Questionnaire (UK HEIs), available at: www.cie.uce.ac.uk/evalued/Library/Paper1_Qu Analysis.pdf (accessed 20 October 2003).
20. Winkworth, I. (2001), “ Innovative United Kingdom approaches to measuring service quality ”, Library Trends, Vol. 49 No. 4.