A review of the literature for the jubilee project: (jisc user behaviour in information seeking: longitudinal evaluation of electronic information services)

New Review of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 81-114

  Banwell, Linda ^a   Gannon‐Leary, Pat ^a  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986052012     PISSN: 13614533     EISSN: 17407834     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13614539909516791     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. JISC Monitoring and Evaluating User Behaviour in Information Seeking and Use of Information Technology and Information Services in UK HE Circular 1/99 24 February http://www.jisc.ac.uk/pub99/c01 99.html (http://www.jisc.ac.uk/pub99/c01 99.html)
2. IMPEL2 Project. 1998. Impact on People of Electronic Libraries: IMPEL Guides. http://ilm.ac.uk/impel
3. DAY, J., EAST, H., and STONE, P., Use and users of networked information, JISC/CEI. discussion paper. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/pub98/user behave.html
4. BANWELL, L., DAY, J., and RAY, K., Managing Organisational Change in the Hybrid Library, UNN School of Information Studies. (Forthcoming)
5. HyLIFE: the Hybrid Library of the Future. http://www.unn.nc.uk/‐xcu2/hylife/(http://www.unn.nc.uk/‐xcu2/hylife/)
6. DAY, J.M., WALTON, G., BENT, M., CURRY, S., EDWARDS, C., and JACKSON, M., Higher education, teaching, learning and the electronic library: a review of the literature for the IMPEL2 project: monitoring organisational and cultural change. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 2131–204.
7. JISC Committee on Electronic Information (CEI) Content Working Group An Integrated Information Environment For Higher Education: Developing The Distributed, National Electronic Resource (DNER). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/cei/dner colpol.html (http://www.jisc.ac.uk/cei/dner colpol.html)
8. ARTS AND HUMANITIES DATA SERVICE http://ahds.ac.uk/(http://ahds.ac.uk/)
9. BIDS web site http://www.bids.ac.uk/info.htm (http://www.bids.ac.uk/info.htm)
10. BUBL web site http://www.buhl.ac.uk (http://www.buhl.ac.uk)
11. SOSIG web site http://www.sosig.ac.uk (http://www.sosig.ac.uk)
12. JISC web site http://www.jisc.ac.uk (http://www.jisc.ac.uk)
13. GREENSTEIN, D., and TRANT, J., 1996. AHDS: Arts and Humanities Data Service. Ariadne, http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue4/ahds/intro.html
14. EAST, H., SHEPPARD, E., and JEAL, Y., 1995. A huge leap forward: a quantitative and qualitative examination of the development of access to database services by British Universities, 1988–1994, British Library Research and Development Report No. 6202 London: British Library.
15. PINHELD, S., 1998. The use of BIDS ISI in a research university: a case study of the University of Birmingham. Program, 32(3) July: 225–40.
16. MACLEOD, R., and KERR, L., 1998. The EEVL approach to providing a subject based information gateway for engineers. Program, 32(3): 205–23.
17. EEVL web site http://www.eevl.ac.uk (http://www.eevl.ac.uk)
18. ADAM web site http://www.adam.ac.uk (http://www.adam.ac.uk)
19. OMNI web site http://www.omni.ac.uk (http://www.omni.ac.uk)
20. KING, I., and MOFFAT, M., 1996. Evaluation of the EEVL Pilot Service. http://www.eevl.ac.uk/evaluation/report.html
21. FORD, B.J., and JACOBS, S.J., 1997. “ Academic libraries ”. In Librarianship and information work worldwide 1996/97, Edited by: Line, M., Mackenzie, G., and Feather, J., 56–89. East Grinstead: Bowker‐Saur.
22. KANTOR, P.B., October 27–29 1996. Assessing the factors leading to adoption of digital libraries, and growth in their impacts: the Goldilocks principle, October 27–29, Allerton 96: 38th Allerton Institute. http://edfu.lis.uiuc.edu/allerton/96/
23. BRINDLEY, L.J., 1998. The development of JISC strategy on electronic collections. Library Review, 47(516): 271–6.
24. 1993. “ FOLLETT REPORT ”. In Report of the Joint Funding Councils’ Libraries Review Group, Bristol: HEFCE.
25. 1995. HEFC The effective academic library: a framework for evaluating the performance of UK academic libraries: a consultative report to HEFC(E), SHEFC, HEFC(W) and DENI by the Joint Funding Council's Ad Hoc Group on performance indicators for libraries, Bristol: HEFC.
26. MacCOLL, J. (Forthcoming) Great expectations: meeting them, and creating them http://www.unn.ac.uk/∼xcu2/hylife/abstracts.html (http://www.unn.ac.uk/∼xcu2/hylife/abstracts.html)
27. EASON, K. Matching Electronic Journals and Scholarly Practice eLib; Electronic Libraries Programme; JISC; digital libraries; papers; reports UKOLN, University of Bath, 1998 http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/tavistock/eason/eason.doc (http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/tavistock/eason/eason.doc)
28. BANDYOPADHYAY, A., 1997. Internet‐based reference services in medical libraries: a perspective. Internet Reference Services. Quarterly, 2(1): 67–77.
29. URQUHART, C., and CRANE, S., 1994. Nurses’ information seeking skills and perceptions of information sources: assessment using vignettes. Journal of Information Science, 20(4): 237–246.
30. PELZER, N.L., and WIESE, W.H., 1998. Library use and information‐seeking behavior of veterinary medical students revisited in the electronic environment. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86(3) Jul: 346–55.
31. KIRRIEMUIR, J., 1999. OMNI: Accessing the Internet. Ariadne, June http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue20/omni/
32. SMITH, G., 1997. Business librarians embrace the Internet: annual business information resources survey. Business Information Review, 14(1) Mar: 1–14.
33. PEDLEY, P., 1997. The use of online databases and CD‐ROM in law libraries. Business Information Review, 14(1) Mar: 19–26.
34. TOMNEY, H., and BURTON, P.F., 1998. Electronic journals: a case study of usage and attitudes among academics. Journal of Information Science, 24(6): 419–29.
35. SHAW, D., and DAVIS, C.H., 1996. The Modern Language Association: Electronic and Paper Surveys of Computer‐Based Tool Use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(12) December: 932–940.
36. BARTON, J., and BLAGDEN, J., 1998. Academic library effectiveness: a comparative approach, British Library. Research and Innovation Report No. 120 London: British Library.
37. VAN HOUSE, N.A., WEIL, B.T., and MCCLURE, C.R., 1990. Measuring academic library performance: a practical approach, London and Chicago: American Library Association.
38. KING RESEARCH LTD. 1990. Keys to success: performance indicators for public libraries, London: HMSO.
39. POLL, R., and BOEKHORST, P., 1996. TE Measuring quality: international guidelines for performance measurement in academic libraries, New Providence, N.J.: K.G. Saur/Reed Publishing. (IFLA publications 76)
40. INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ORGANISATION ISO 11620. 1995. Information and documentation ‐ library performance indicators, ISO.
41. IFLA. 1995. Measuring quality: international guidelines for performance measurement in academic libraries, IFLA.
42. SALOMON, G., 1991. Transcending the qualitative‐quantitative debate: the analytic and system approaches to educational research. Educational Researcher, 20(6): 10–18.
43. ROSSMAN, G., and WILSON, B., 1991. Numbers and words re‐visited: being “shamelessly eclectic”. Evaluation Review, 9(5): 627–643.
44. MAY, N., 1994. A methodology for the measurement of quality of electronic databases. Proceedings of the 3rd International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) Conference: Knowledge Organization and Quality Management. June20–241994, Copenhagen, Denmark.
45. WILSON, T.D., 1998. EQUIP: a European survey of quality criteria for the evaluation of databases. Journal of Information Science, 24(5): 345–57.
46. MCCLURE, C.R., and LOPATA, C., 1996. Assessing the academic networked environment: strategies and options, Washington, D.C.: Coalition for Networked Information. http://istweb.syr.edu/∼mcclure/network/toc.html
47. BERTOT, J.C., and MCCLURE, C.R., 1997. Impacts of public access to the Internet through Pennsylvania Public Libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 16(4) Dec.: 151–64.
48. BANE, A. F., and MILHEIM, W.D., 1995. Internet Insights: How Academics Are Using the Internet. Computers In Libraries, 15(2) February: 32–37.
49. BARBUTO, D., and CEVALLOS, E., 1991. End User Searching: Program Review and Future Prospects. RQ, 31(2) Winter: 214–227.
50. BROPHY, P., and WYNNE, P.M., 1997. Management information systems and performance measurement for the electronic library: eLib supporting study (MIEL2) final report, Preston: university of Central Lancashire Centre for Research in Library & Information Management. http://www.uko1n.ac.uk/dlis/mode1s/studies
51. DAY, J., 1997. Managing change in information and library services. Information Professional, 1(9): 27–30. 1997
52. VAN HOUSE, N.A., User Needs Assessment and Evaluation for the Berkeley Electronic Environmental Library Project. Proceedings of Digital Libraries: The Second Annual Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries Texas A&M University 1995. pp. 71–76. http://csdl.tamu.edu/DL95/papers/vanhouse/vanhouse.html
53. MARSHALL, C., 1995. “ Who are the users and what are they doing in the library? ”. In Allerton 95 http://edfu.lis.uiuc.edu/al1erton/95/s5/marsha11.htm1
54. MURRAY, E.H., 1990. “ Sample topic: student nonuse of library literature on CD‐ROM ”. In Evaluation and library decision making, Edited by: Hernon, P., and McClure, C.R., 185–198. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
55. HYLAND, P., and WRIGHT, L., 1995. Profile of Patrons and Their Use of CD‐ROM Databases in an Academic Library. The Australian Library Journal, 44 May: 90–100.
56. SEIDEN, P., SZYMBORSKI, K., and NORELLI, B., 1997. Undergraduate Students in the Digital Library: Information Seeking Behavior in an Heterogeneous Environment. Contributed paper, ACRL National Conference. 1997. http://www.ala.org/acr1/paperhtm/c26.htm1
57. RAY, K., and DAY, J., 1998. Student attitudes towards electronic information resources. Working paper. Information research: an electronic journal, 4(2) October http://www.shef.ac.uk/∼is/pub1ications/infres/papers54.htm1
58. RAY, K.S., 1997. Student attitudes towards the use of electronic sources of information at Sunderland University, University of Northumbria at Newcastle. School of Information Studies. MA Dissertation
59. EVANS, L., and KEERAN, P., 1995. Beneath the Tip of the Iceberg: Expanding Students’ Information Horizons. Research Strategies, 13(4) Fall: 235–244.
60. HE, P.W., and JACOBSON, T.E., 1996. What Are They Doing with the Internet? A Study of User Information Seeking Behavior. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 1(1): 31–51.
61. MCCARTHY, C.A., KRAUSSE, S.C., and LANE, A.A., 1997. Expectations and Effectiveness Using CD‐ROMs: What Do Patrons Want and How Satisfied Are They?. College & Research Libraries, 58 March: 128–142.
62. SCHMID, T. D., and DAVIS, E.B., 1991. CD‐ROM Use in a Science Library. Science & Technology Libraries, 12(2) Winter: 29–41.
63. ALLEN, G., 1990. Database Selection by Patrons Using CD‐ROM. College & Research Libraries, 51 January: 69–75.
64. CLARK, K.E., and GOMEZ, J., 1990. Faculty Use of Databases at Texas A&M University. RQ, Winter: 241–8.
65. MEHTA, U., and YOUNG, V.E., 1995. Use of Electronic Information Resources: A Survey of Science and Engineering Faculty. Science and Technology Libraries, 15(3): 43–54.
66. BARRY, C.A., and SQUIRES, D., Why the move from traditional information‐seeking to the electronic library is not straightforward for academic users: some surprising findings. Online Information 95: 19th Online Information Meeting proceedings. December5–71995, London. Edited by: Raitt, D.I., and Jeapes, B., pp. 177–87. Oxford and New Jersey: Learned Information (Europe) Ltd.
67. FORSYTH, B., 1997. Academic resistance to technology: redefining the scholar's identity. Research and reflection, 3(1) May http://www.pnnzaga.edu/rr/v3n1/forsvth.httn1
68. BISHOP, A., 1995. Building a University Digital Library: The Need for a User‐Centered Approach, Urbana‐Champaign: University of Illinois. http://anshar.grainger.uiuc.edu/dlisoc/monterey.final copv.html
69. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS DIGITAL LIBRARY INITIATIVE SOCIAL SCIENCE TEAM http://anshar.grainger.uiuc.edu/dlisoc/(http://anshar.grainger.uiuc.edu/dlisoc/)
70. PALMQUIST, R., and KIM, K‐S., 1998. “ Modelling the users of information systems: some theories and methods ”. In Electronic resources: use and user behaviour, Edited by: Iyer, H., 3–25. Haworth Press.
71. JACOBSON, T. L., 1991. Sense‐Making in a Database Environment. Information Processing & Management, 27(6): 647–57.
72. DERVIN, B., 1995. “ The Relationship of User‐Centered Evaluation to Design: Addressing Issues of Productivity and Power ”. In Allerton 95, 37th Allerton Institute. http://edfu.lis.uiuc.edu/allerton/95/s5/dervin.html
73. BROADBENT, M., and LOFGREN, H., 1993. Information delivery: identifying priorities, performance, and value. Information Processing & Management, 29(6) Nov‐Dec: 683–701.
74. PARASURAMAN, A., ZEITHAML, A., and BERRY, L.L., 1985. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4) Fall: 41–50.
75. CAMPBELL, S.J., and DONELLY, M., 1995. A measurement of service. Scottish Libraries, Mar/Apr: 10–11.
76. NITECKI, D.A., Assessment of service quality in academic libraries: focus on the applicability of the SERVQUAL. Proceedings of the 2nd Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services 7 to 11 September 1997. pp. 181–196. Newcastle upon Tyne: Information North.
77. PARKER, S., BANWELL, L., and VINCENT, K., LOGOPLUS: Developing innovative performance measures to investigate the impact of local government reorganisation on public library users and staff. Proceedings of the 2nd Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services 7 to 11 September 1997. pp. 351–356. Newcastle upon Tyne: Information North.
78. HERNON, P., and ALTMAN, E., 1996. Service quality in academic libraries, Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
79. CALVERT, P.J., 1997. Measuring service quality: from theory into practice. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 28(3) Sep: 198–204.
80. REMENYI, D.S.J., and MONEY, A.H., 1994. Service quality and correspondence analysis in determining problems with the effective use of computer services. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(1) Jan: 2–12.
81. BROADBENT, M., Demonstrating information service value to your organization. Online Information 92. Proceedings of the 16th International Online Information Meeting. December8–101992, London. Edited by: Raitt, D.I., pp. 65–83. Oxford and New Jersey: Learned Information (Europe).
82. HERNON, P., and MCCLURE, C.R., 1990. Evaluation and library decision making, Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
83. BORBINHA, J.L.B., and DELGADO, J.C.M., 1996. Networked digital libraries. Microcomputers for Information Management, 13(3–4): 195–215.
84. FINHOLT, T.A., 1995. Research on collaboratories at the University of Michigan Allerton 95 http://edfu.lis.uiuc edu/al1erton/95/s5/finholt.html
85. ROWE, R.R., 1996. The transformation of scholarly communications and the future of serials. Serials Review, 22(2) Summer: 33–43.
86. SMALL, M., 1997. Virtual university libraries: a report of ALIA's 1996 grant study. Australian Library Journal, 46(4) Nov: 409–19.
87. BRENNER, E., 1998. VC conference in Bath, England. Information Today, 15(8) Sep.: 16–17. 58
88. LUBANS, J., 1998. Student use of the internet: creative collaboration among providers and consumers or ‘It's not love, but it's not bad’. New York New Media Association panel presentation. Nov.161998. http://www.lib.duke.edu/staff/orpnztn/lubans/docs/nvnma/nvnma.html