Impact of neurological impairment, depression, cognitive function and coping on quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis: A relative importance analysis

Multiple Sclerosis

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1468-1472

  Fernández Jiménez, Eduardo ^a   Arnett, Peter A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive function; coping; depression; Expanded Disability Status Scale; multiple sclerosis; predictive model; quality of life measures; relative importance; relative weight

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY FASTSCREEN; COGNITION; COGNITION ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; DEPRESSION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE DURATION; EXPANDED DISABILITY STATUS SCALE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE ASSESSMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PREDICTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION DISORDERS; COMPLICATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; COGNITION DISORDERS; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84985994163     PISSN: 13524585     EISSN: 14770970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1352458514562439     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Benedict RHB, Wahlig E, Bakshi R, et al. Predicting quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Accounting for physical disability, fatigue, cognition, mood disorder, personality and behavior change. J Neurol Sci 2005; 231: 29-34.
2. Spain LA, Tubridy N, Kilpatrick TJ, et al. Illness perception and health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2007; 116: 293-299.
3. Fruehwald S, Loeffler-Stastka H, Eher R, et al. Depression and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2001; 104: 257-261.
4. Tonidandel S, LeBreton JM,. Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. J Bus Psychol 2011; 26: 1-9.
5. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 121-127.
6. Arnett PA, Higginson CI, Randolph JJ,. Depression in multiple sclerosis: Relationship to planning ability. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2001; 7: 665-674.
7. Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ,. FIRE: An SPSS program for variable selection in multiple linear regression analysis via the relative importance of predictors. Behav Res Methods 2011; 43: 1-7.
8. Baumstarck K, Simeoni MC, Reuter F, et al. Cognitive function and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: A cross-sectional study. BMC Neurol 2011; 11: 17.
9. Rosti E, Mantynen A, Koivisto K, et al. Neuropsychological rehabilitation has beneficial effects on perceived cognitive deficits in multiple sclerosis during nine-month follow-up. J Neurol Sci 2013; 334: 154-160.
10. Higginson CI, Arnett PA, Voss WD,. The ecological validity of clinical tests of memory and attention in multiple sclerosis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2000; 15: 185-204.