A formative evaluation of customized pamphlets to promote physical activity and symptom self-management in women with multiple sclerosis

Health Education Research

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 883-896

  Plow, Matthew ^a   Bethoux, Francois ^b   Mai, Kimloan ^b   Marcus, Bess ^c  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, RELAPSING-REMITTING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, RELAPSING-REMITTING; PAMPHLETS; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84985905517     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyu034     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Online Prevalence Data. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2005.
2. Rimmer JH. Exercise and physical activity in persons aging with a physical disability. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2005; 16: 41-56.
3. Rimmer JH, Riley B, Wang E et al. Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. Am J Prev Med 2004; 26: 419-25.
4. Cohen DJ, Balasubramanian BA, Isaacson NF et al. Coordination of health behavior counseling in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9: 406-15.
5. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 2003; 27(Suppl 3): S227-32.
6. Kreuter MW, Oswald DL, Bull FC et al. Are tailored health education materials always more effective than non-tailored materials? Health Educ Res 2000; 15: 305-15.
7. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 673-93.
8. Wanyonyi KL, Themessl-Huber M, Humphris G et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of face-to-face communication of tailored health messages: implications for practice. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 85: 348-55.
9. Marcus BH, Bock BC, Pinto BM et al. Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention. Ann Behav Med 1998; 20: 174-80.
10. Marcus BH, Emmons KM, Simkin-Silverman LR et al. Evaluation of motivationally tailored vs. standard self-help physical activity interventions at the workplace. Am J Health Promot 1998; 12: 246-53.
11. Marcus BH, Napolitano MA, King AC et al. Telephone versus print delivery of an individualized motivationally tailored physical activity intervention: project STRIDE. Health Psychol 2007; 26: 401-9.
12. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
13. Prochaska J, Redding C, Evers K. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2008.
14. Marcus B, Forsyth L. Motivating People to be Physically Active. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2009.
15. Ragonese P, Aridon P, Salemi G et al. Mortality in multiple sclerosis: a review. Eur J Neurol 2008; 15: 123-7.
16. Plow M, Bethoux F, McDaniel C et al. Randomized controlled pilot study of customized pamphlets to promote physical activity and symptom self-management in women with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil 2014; 28: 139-48.
17. Patton MQ. Evaluation of program implementation. Eval Stud Rev Annu 1979; 4: 318-45.
18. Stetler CB, Legro MW, Wallace CM et al. The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21(Suppl 2): S1-8.
19. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000; 321: 694-6.
20. Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF et al. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALORE taxonomy. Psychol Health 2011; 26: 1479-98.
21. McMillan L, Moore KA. The development and validation of the impact of multiple sclerosis scale and the symptoms of multiple sclerosis scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 832-41.
22. Tomaszewski G, Callaghan C. Self-management in Theory and Practice: A guide for Healthcare Providers 2009. Available at: http://www.swselfmanagement.ca/smtoolkit/. Accessed: 19 June 2014.
23. Marcus BH, Rossi JS, Selby VC et al. The stages and processes of exercise adoption and maintenance in a worksite sample. Health Psychol 1992; 11: 386-95.
24. Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Rossi JS. Assessing motivational readiness and decision making for exercise. Health Psychol 1992; 11: 257-61.
25. Plow M, Finlayson M, Cho C. Correlates of stages of change for physical activity in adults with multiple sclerosis. Res Nurs Health 2011; 34: 378-88.
26. Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS et al. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exerc Sport 1992; 63: 60-6.
27. Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB et al. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med 1987; 16: 825-36.
28. Plow M, Mathiowetz V, Lowe DA. Comparing individualized rehabilitation to a group wellness intervention for persons with multiple sclerosis. Am J Health Promot 2009; 24: 23-6.
29. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL et al. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract 2001; 4: 256-62.
30. Weiss RS. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International, 1994.
31. Bock BC, Marcus BH, Pinto BM et al. Maintenance of physical activity following an individualized motivationally tailored intervention. Ann Behav Med 2001; 23: 79-87.
32. Dlugonski D, Wojcicki TR, McAuley E et al. Social cognitive correlates of physical activity in inactive adults with multiple sclerosis. Int J Rehabil Res 2011; 34: 115-20.
33. Plow M, Resnik L, Allen SM. Exploring physical activity behaviour of persons with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 1652-65.
34. Kayes NM, McPherson KM, Schluter P et al. Exploring the facilitators and barriers to engagement in physical activity for people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 1043-53.
35. Kayes NM, McPherson KM, Taylor D et al. Facilitators and barriers to engagement in physical activity for people with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative investigation. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 625-42.
36. Becker H, Stuifbergen A. What makes it so hard? Barriers to health promotion experienced by people with multiple sclerosis and polio. Fam Community Health 2004; 27: 75-85.
37. Plow M, Finlayson M, Motl RW et al. Randomized controlled trial of a teleconference fatigue management plus physical activity intervention in adults with multiple sclerosis: rationale and research protocol. BMC Neurol 2012; 12: 122.
38. Buunk AP, Gibbons FX. Social comparison: the end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2007; 102: 3-21.
39. Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Brown SA et al. Meta-analysis of patient education interventions to increase physical activity among chronically ill adults. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 70: 157-72.
40. Lei H, Nahum-Shani I, Lynch K et al. A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2012; 8: 21-48.
41. Levit K, Smith C, Cowan C et al. Trends in U.S. health care spending, 2001. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003; 22: 154-64.
42. Pratt M, Norris J, Lobelo F etal. The cost of physical inactivity: moving into the 21st century. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 171-3.
43. Khan F, Turner-Stokes L, Ng L et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 114.