Computer-based assessment in education

Educational and Child Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 58-74

  Singleton, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84985901102     PISSN: 02671611     EISSN: 23968702     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bartram, D. (1994). Computer-based assessment. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 31-69.
2. British Psychological Society (BPS) (1995). Psychological testing: A user's guide. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
3. British Psychological Society (BPS) (1999) Guidelines for the development and use of computer-based assessments. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
4. Bull, J. (1994). Computer-based assessment: some issues for consideration. Active Learning, 1, 18-21.
5. Cisero, C. A., Royer, J. M., Marchant, H. G. & Jackson, S. J. (1997) Can the computer-based academic assessment system (CAAS) be used to diagnose reading disability in college students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 599-620.
6. College Board (1995) Accuplacer 5.0 for Windows. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
7. Crook, C. (1994) Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.
8. Crook, C. and Steele, J. (1987). Self-selection of simple computer activities by infant school pupils. Educational Psychology, 7, 23-32.
9. Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297-1326.
10. Dimock, P. H. & Cormier, P. (1991). The effects of format differences and computer experience on performance and anxiety on a computer-administered test. Measurement and evaluation in counselling and development, 24, 119-126.
11. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C. & Burley, J. (1997). British picture vocabulary scale (2nd ed.). Windsor, Berks: NFER-Nelson.
12. Durndell, A. (1991). The persistence of the gender gap in computing. Computers and Education, 16, 283-287.
13. Elliott, C. D., Smith, P. & McCulloch, K. (1996). British ability scales (2nd ed.). Windsor, Berks: NFERNelson.
14. Evans, L. D., Tannehill, R. & Martin, S. (1995). Children's reading skills: A comparison of traditional and computerised assessment. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 27, 162-165.
15. French, C. (1986). Microcomputers and psychometric assessment. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 14(1), 33-45.
16. French, C. & Beaumont, J. G. (1990). A clinical study of the automated assessment of intelligence by the Mill Hill Vocabulary Test and the Standard Progressive Matrices test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 129-140.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. & Hamlett, C. (1993). Technological advances linking the assessment of students' academic proficiency to instructional planning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 49-62.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. & Hasselbring, T. S. (1987). Using computers with curriculumbased monitoring: Effects on teacher efficiency and satisfaction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8, 14-27.
19. Godfrey Thompson Unit (1993). Edinburgh Reading Tests. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
20. Greenwood, C. R. & Rieth, H. R. (1994). Current dimensions of technology-based assessment in special education. Exceptional Children, 61(2), 105-113.
21. Hagues, N. & Courtenay, D. (1993) NFER-NELSON Verbal Reasoning Test Series. Windsor, Berks: NFER-Nelson.
22. Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985) Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
23. Horne, J. K., Singleton, C. H. & Thomas, K. V. (1999). LASS secondary computerised assessment system. Beverley, East Yorkshire: Lucid Creative Limited.
24. Hughes, M., Brackenridge, A., & Macleod, H. (1987). Children's ideas about computers. In J. Rutkowska and C. Crook (Eds.), Computers, cognition and development. Chichester: Wiley.
25. Maguire, K. B., Knobel, M. L. M., Knobel, B. L. & Sedlacek, L. G. (1991). Computer-adapted PPVT-R: A comparison between standard and modified versions within an elementary school population. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 199-205.
26. Martin, T. A. & Wilcox, K. L. (1989). Hypercard administration of a block-design task. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 21, 312-15.
27. McCullough, C. S. and Wenck, L. S. (1984). Current microcomputer applications in school psychology. School Psychology Review, 13, 429-439.
28. Miller, L. DeJean, J. and Miller, R. (2000). The literacy learning curriculum and use of an integrated learning system. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 123-135.
29. Moore, N. C., Summer, K. R. and Bloor, R. N. (1984). Do patients likes psychometric testing by computer? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 875-877.
30. Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix Analogies Test. New York: Psychological Corporation.
31. National Council for Educational Technology (NCET) (1994). Using IT for assessment: Going forward. Coventry: National Council for Educational Technology.
32. National Council for Educational Technology (NCET) (1995). Using IT for assessment: Case studies reports. Coventry: National Council for Educational Technology.
33. National Council for Educational Technology (NCET) (1996). Integrated learning systems: Report of phase II of the pilot evaluation of ILS in the UK. Coventry: National Council for Educational Technology.
34. Olsen, J. B. (1990). Applying computerized adaptive testing in schools. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 23, 31-38.
35. School Cuurriculum and Assessment Authority (SCAA) (1996). Desirable outcomes for children's learning on entering compulsory education. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
36. School Cuurriculum and Assessment Authority (SCAA) (1997) The National Framework for Baseline Assessment: Criteria and procedures for Accreditation of Baseline Assessment Schemes. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
37. Scott, T., Cole, M. & Engel, M. (1992). Computers and education: Acultural constructivist perspective. Review of Research in Education, 18, 191-251.
38. Singleton, C. H. (1997). Computerised assessment of reading. In J. R. Beech and C. H. Singleton (Eds.), The psychological assessment of reading (pp.257-278). London: Routledge.
39. Singleton, C. H. & Horne, J. K. (in press). Computerised baseline assessment of mathematics. Educational Research and Evaluation.
40. Singleton, C. H., Horne, J. K. & Thomas, K. V. (1999). Computerised baseline assessment. Journal of Research in Reading, 22(1), 67-80.
41. Singleton, C. H., Horne, J. K. & Vincent, D. (1995). Implementation of a computer-based system for the diagnostic assessment of reading. Unpublished Project Report to the National Council for Educational Technology. Hull: Department of Psychology, University of Hull.
42. Singleton, C. H. & Thomas, K. V. (1994). Computerised screening for dyslexia. In C. H. Singleton (Ed.), Computers and dyslexia: Educational applications of new technology (pp.172-184). Hull: Dyslexia Computer Resource Centre, University of Hull.
43. Singleton, C. H., Thomas, K. V. & Horne, J. K. (1998). CoPS baseline assessment system. Beverley, East Yorkshire: Lucid Research Limited.
44. Singleton, C. H., Thomas, K. V. & Horne, J.K. (2000). Computer-based cognitive assessment and the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 158-180.
45. Singleton, C. H., Thomas, K. V. & Leedale, R. C. (1996). Lucid CoPS Cognitive Profiling System Beverley, East Yorkshire: Lucid Research Limited.
46. Singleton, C. H., Thomas, K. V., Leedale, R. C. & Horne, J. K. (in press). Lucid Adult Dyslexia Screening (LADS). Beverley, East Yorkshire: Lucid Creative Limited.
47. Skinner, H. A. and Allen, B. A. (1983). Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug and tobacco use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 267-275.
48. Smith, P. and Hagues, N. (1993). NFER-NELSON Non-verbal Reasoning Test Series. Windsor, Berks: NFER-Nelson.
49. Stephens, D. (1994). Using computer-assisted assessment: time saver or sophisticated distraction? Active Learning, 1, 11-15.
50. Thomas, K. V., Singleton, C. H. & Horne, J. K. (2001). LASS Junior Computerised Assessment System. Beverley, East Yorkshire: Lucid Creative Limited.
51. Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. & France, N. (1989). Cognitive Abilities Test (2nd ed.). Windsor, Berks: NFER-Nelson.
52. Tymms, P. (1999) Baseline assessment, value added and the prediction of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 22(1), 27-36.
53. Underwood, J. (2000). A comparison of two types of computer support for reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 136-148.
54. Underwood, J., Cavendish, S., Dowling, S., Fogelman, K. and Lawson, T. (1994). Integrated learning systems in UK schools. Coventry: National Council for Educational Technology.
55. Underwood, J., Cavendish, S., Dowling, S. and Lawson, T. (1996). Integrated learning systems: A study of sustainable gains in UK Schools. Coventry: National Council for Educational Technology.
56. Wade, B. and Moore, M. (1993). The test's the thing: Viewpoints of students with special educational needs. Educational Studies, 19(2), 181-191.
57. Watkins, M. W. and Kush, J. C. (1988). Assessment of academic skills of learning disabled students with classroom microcomputers. School Psychology Review, 17(1), 81-88.
58. Wesson, C., Fuchs, L. S., Tindal, G., Mirkin, P. and Deno, S. (1986). Facilitating the efficiency of ongoing curriculum-based measurement. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9, 166-172.
59. Wilson, S. L., Thompson, J. A. and Wylie, G. (1982) Automated psychological testing for the severely physically handicapped. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 291-296.
60. Wood, D., Underwood, J. and Avis, P. (1999). Integrated learning systems in the classroom. Computers and Education, 33(2/3), 91-108.
61. Woodward, J. and Rieth, H. (1997). A historical review of technology research in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67(4), 503-536.