Cell types differ in global coordination of splicing and proportion of highly expressed genes

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Trakhtenberg, Ephraim F ^a   Pho, Nam ^b   Holton, Kristina M ^b   Chittenden, Thomas W ^b   Goldberg, Jeffrey L ^c   Dong, Lingsheng ^b  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GLIA; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ALTERNATIVE SPLICING; ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MICE, TRANSGENIC; NEUROGLIA; NEURONS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84985027782     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep32249     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Konishi, T. A thermodynamic model of transcriptome formation. Nucleic Acids Res 33, 6587-6592, doi: 10.1093/nar/gki967 (2005).
2. Pérez-Ortín, J. E., Alepuz, P., Chávez, S. & Choder, M. Eukaryotic mRNA decay: methodologies, pathways, and links to other stages of gene expression. J Mol Biol 425, 3750-3775, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.02.029 (2013).
3. Miller, C. et al. Dynamic transcriptome analysis measures rates of mRNA synthesis and decay in yeast. Mol Syst Biol. 7, 458, doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.112 (2011).
4. Schwalb, B. et al. Measurement of genome-wide RNA synthesis and decay rates with Dynamic Transcriptome Analysis (DTA). Bioinformatics 28, 884-885, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts052 (2012).
5. Sun, M. et al. Comparative dynamic transcriptome analysis (cDTA) reveals mutual feedback between mRNA synthesis and degradation. Genome Res 22, 1350-1359, doi: 10.1101/gr.130161.111 (2012).
6. Dori-Bachash, M., Shema, E. & Tirosh, I. Coupled evolution of transcription and mRNA degradation. PLoS Biol 9, e1001106, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001106 (2011).
7. Rabani, M. et al. Metabolic labeling of RNA uncovers principles of RNA production and degradation dynamics in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 29, 436-442, doi: 10.1038/nbt.1861 (2011).
8. Amorim, M. J., Cotobal, C., Duncan, C. & Mata, J. Global coordination of transcriptional control and mRNA decay during cellular differentiation. Mol Syst Biol 6, 380, doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.38 (2010).
9. Dölken, L. et al. High-resolution gene expression profiling for simultaneous kinetic parameter analysis of RNA synthesis and decay. RNA 14, 1959-1972, doi: 10.1261/rna.1136108 (2008).
10. Lin, C. Y. et al. Transcriptional amplification in tumor cells with elevated c-Myc. Cell 151, 56-67, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.026 (2012).
11. Nie, Z. et al. c-Myc is a universal amplifier of expressed genes in lymphocytes and embryonic stem cells. Cell 151, 68-79, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.033 (2012).
12. Upender, M. B. et al. Chromosome transfer induced aneuploidy results in complex dysregulation of the cellular transcriptome in immortalized and cancer cells. Cancer Res 64, 6941-6949, doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0474 (2004).
13. Trakhtenberg, E. F. et al. Regulating Set-β's Subcellular Localization Toggles Its Function between Inhibiting and Promoting Axon Growth and Regeneration. J Neurosci. 34, 7361-7374, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3658-13.2014 (2014).
14. Zhang, Y. et al. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 34, 11929-11947, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014 (2014).
15. Paralkar, V. R. et al. Lineage and species-specific long noncoding RNAs during erythro-megakaryocytic development. Blood 123, 1927-1937, doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-12-544494 (2014).
16. An, X. et al. Global transcriptome analyses of human and murine terminal erythroid differentiation. Blood 123, 3466-3477, doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-548305 (2014).
17. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc 7, 562-578, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 (2012).
18. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol 31, 46-53, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2450 (2013).
19. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9, 357-359, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 (2012).
20. McIntyre, L. M. et al. RNA-seq: technical variability and sampling. BMC Genomics 12, 293, doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-293 (2011).
21. Tarazona, S., García-Alcalde, F., Dopazo, J., Ferrer, A. & Conesa, A. Differential expression in RNA-seq: a matter of depth. Genome Res 21, 2213-2223, doi: 10.1101/gr.124321.111 (2011).
22. Wagner, G. P., Kin, K. & Lynch, V. J. Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples. Theory Biosci. 131, 281-285, doi: 10.1007/s12064-012-0162-3 (2012).
23. Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K. & Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11, R14, doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14 (2010).
24. Oshlack, A. & Wakefield, M. J. Transcript length bias in RNA-seq data confounds systems biology. Biol Direct 4, 14, doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-4-14 (2009).
25. Rapaport, F. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 14, R95, doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r95 (2013).
26. Jiao, X. et al. DAVID-WS: a stateful web service to facilitate gene/protein list analysis. Bioinformatics 28, 1805-1806, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts251 (2012).
27. Huang, d. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4, 44-57, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 (2009).
28. Welch, J. J. et al. Global regulation of erythroid gene expression by transcription factor GATA-1. Blood 104, 3136-3147, doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1603 (2004).
29. Lovén, J. et al. Revisiting global gene expression analysis. Cell 151, 476-482, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.012 (2012).
30. Jiang, L. et al. Synthetic spike-in standards for RNA-seq experiments. Genome Res 21, 1543-1551, doi: 10.1101/gr.121095.111 (2011).
31. Pronk, C. J. et al. Elucidation of the phenotypic, functional, and molecular topography of a myeloerythroid progenitor cell hierarchy. Cell Stem Cell 1, 428-442, doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.07.005 (2007).
32. Trakhtenberg, E. F. et al. The N-terminal Set-β Protein Isoform Induces Neuronal Death. J Biol Chem 290, 13417-13426, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.633883 (2015).
33. Harrow, J. et al. GENCODE: producing a reference annotation for ENCODE. Genome Biol 7 Suppl 1, S4.1-9, doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s4 (2006).
34. Hsu, F. et al. The UCSC Known Genes. Bioinformatics 22, 1036-1046, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl048 (2006).
35. DeLuca, D. S. et al. RNA-SeQC: RNA-seq metrics for quality control and process optimization. Bioinformatics 28, 1530-1532, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts196 (2012).
36. de Hoon, M. J., Imoto, S., Nolan, J. & Miyano, S. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics 20, 1453-1454, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth078 (2004).
37. Saldanha, A. J. Java Treeview-extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20, 3246-3248, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth349 (2004).