The National Lung Screening Trial: Results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology

Cancer

Volumn 119, Issue 22, 2013, Pages 3976-3983

  Pinsky, Paul F ^a   Church, Timothy R ^b   Izmirlian, Grant ^a   Kramer, Barnett S ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

computed tomography; histology; lung cancer; screening; sex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NON SMALL CELL CANCER; LUNG SMALL CELL CANCER; LUNG SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SMOKING; SURVIVAL RATE; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; LUNG CANCER; SCREENING; SEX;

AGED; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; RISK FACTORS; SMOKING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84887074565     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28326     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team;, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 395-409.
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Guidelines. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician-gls/f-guidelines.asp#detection. Accessed February 3, 2011.
3. Bach PB, Gould MK,. When the average applies to no one: personalized decision making about potential benefits of lung cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157: 571-573.
4. Pinsky PF, Berg C,. Applying the National Lung Screening Trial eligibility criteria to the US population: what percent of the population and of incident lung cancers would be covered. J Med Screen. 2012; 19: 154-156.
5. Kondo R, Yoshida K, Kawakami S, et al. Different efficacy of CT screening for lung cancer according to histological type: analysis of Japanese-smoker cases detected using a low-dose CT screen. Lung Cancer. 2011; 74: 433-440.
6. Cuffe S, Moua T, Summerfield R, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of small cell lung cancer patients diagnosed during two lung cancer computed tomographic screening programs in heavy smokers. J Thorac Oncol. 2011; 6: 818-822.
7. International Collaboration of Epidemiologic Studies of Cervical Cancer. Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2006; 120: 885-891.
8. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Berg CD, et al. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology. 2011; 258: 243-253.
9. Ou SI, Zell JA,. Carcinoma NOS is a common histologic diagnosis and is increasing in proportion among non-small cell lung cancer histologies. J Thorac Oncol. 2009; 4: 1202-1211.
10. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011; 6: 244-285.
11. Wilson DO, Ryan A, Fuhrman C, et al. Doubling times and CT screen-detected lung cancers in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012; 185: 85-89.
12. Hasegawa M, Sone S, Takashimi S, et al. Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol. 2000; 73: 1252-1259.