A similarity-based framework for the alignment of an ontology for remote sensing

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 96, Issue , 2016, Pages 202-207

  Farah, Mohamed ^a   Nefzi, Hafedh ^a   Farah, Imed Riadh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANOUBA   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Dimensionality reduction; Ontology alignment; Ontology conceptualization; Ordinal regression model; Remote sensing; Similarity measures

Indexed keywords

REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS;

DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; GLOBAL SIMILARITY; ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT; ONTOLOGY BUILDING; ORDINAL REGRESSION; RANKING MODEL; SEMANTIC RESOURCES; SIMILARITY MEASURE;

REMOTE SENSING;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 84984823915     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.08.018     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Banerjee, A., Pedersen, T., 2003. Extended gloss overlaps as a measure of semantic relatedness. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 805–810.
2. Blaschke, T., Hay, G.J., Kelly, M., Lang, S., Hofmann, P., Addink, E., Feitosa, R.Q., van der Meer, F., van der Werff, H., van Coillie, F., Tiede, D., Geographic object-based image analysis – towards a new paradigm. {ISPRS} J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 87 (2014), 180–191.
3. Charlet, J., Szulman, S., Aussenac-Gilles, N., Nazarenko, A., Hernandez, N., Nadah, N., Sardet, E., Delahousse, J., Téguiak, H.V., Baneyx, A., 2010. DaFOE: Une Plateforme pour Construire des Ontologies à partir de Textes et de Thésaurus. In: Extraction et Gestion des Connaissances, pp. 631–632.
4. COGIT-IGN. FusionTopoCarto2 Ontology 〈 http://geonto.lri.fr/ressources_fichiers/FusionTopoCarto2.owl〉.
5. Durand, N., Derivaux, S., Forestier, G., Wemmert, C., Gancarski, P., Boussaid, O., Puissant, A., 2007. Ontology-based object recognition for remote sensing image interpretation. In: IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Greece, pp. 472–479.
6. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L., Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R., (eds.) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web, 2002 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference, EKAW 2002, Sigüenza, Spain, October 1–4, 2002, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 166–181.
7. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Sweetening WordNet with DOLCE. AI Mag. 24:3 (2003), 13–24.
8. Gardenfors, P., Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. 2000, Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge.
9. Gentner, D., Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn. Sci. 7 (1989), 155–170.
10. Goldstone, R., Alignment-based nonmonotonicities in similarity. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22 (1996), 988–1001.
11. Hahn, U., Close, J., Graf, M., Transformation direction influences shape similarity judgements. Psychol. Sci., 2009, 447–454.
12. Hamming, R.W., Error detecting and error correcting codes. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 29 (1950), 147–160.
13. Holyoak, K., Koh, K., Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Mem. Cogn. 15:4 (1987), 332–340.
14. Imai, S., Pattern similarity and cognitive transformations. Acta Psychol. 41:6 (1977), 433–447.
15. Jaccard, P., Distribution de la Flore Alpine dans le Bassin des Dranses et dans Quelques Régions Voisines. Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 37 (1901), 241–272.
16. Jacquet Lagreze, E., Siskos, Y., Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: the UTA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10 (1982), 151–164.
17. Janowicz, K. FTT Ontology 〈 http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de/janowicz/downloads/FTT-v01.owl〉.
18. Jaro, M.A., Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1989, 414–420.
19. Joshua, M., Shawn, B., Mark, S., Sergeui, K., Deana, P., Ferdinando, V., 2007. An ontology for describing and synthesizing ecological observation data. In: 5th International Conference on Ecological Informatics, pp. 279–296.
20. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M., 1998. Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. In: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 265–283.
21. Levenshtein, V.I., Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 10 (1966), 707–710.
22. Markman, A.B., Gentner, D., Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cogn. Psychol. 25:4 (1993), 431–467.
23. Nefzi, H., Farah, M., Farah I.R., Solaiman, B., 2014a. A critical analysis of lifecycles and methods for ontology construction and evaluation. In: IEEE 1st International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing, pp. 48–53.
24. Nefzi, H., Farah, M., Farah, I.R., Solaiman, B., 2014b. A reduced set of similarity measures for concept mapping in the ontological enrichment process. In: 5èmes Journèes Francophones sur les Ontologies, Hammamet, Tunisia, pp. 235–246.
25. Rada, R., Mili, H., Bichnell, E., Blettner, M., 1989. Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 17–30.
26. Raskin, R., Pan, M., Knowledge representation in the semantic web for earth and environmental terminology (SWEET). Comput. Geosci. 31:9 (2005), 1119–1125.
27. Sjöberg, L., 1972. A Cognitive Theory of Similarity. Göteborg Psychological Reports. Department of Psychology, University of Göteborg.
28. Tripathi, A., Babaie, H., Developing a modular hydrogeology ontology by extending the sweet upper-level ontologies. Comput. Geosci. 34:9 (2008), 1022–1033.
29. Tversky, A., Gati, I., Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. Psychol. Rev. 89 (1982), 123–154.
30. Wiener-Ehrlich, W.K., Bart, W.M., Millward, R., An analysis of generative representation systems. J. Math. Psychol. 21:3 (1980), 219–246.
31. Wu, Z., Palmer, M., 1994. Verb semantics and lexical selection. In: Proceeding of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Associations for Computational Linguistics, pp. 133–138.