Concurrent validity of administering the Functional Independence measure (FIM) instrument by interview

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 88, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 766-770

  Young, Yuchi ^a   Fan, Ming Yu ^b   Hebel, J Richard ^c   Boult, Chad ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

FIM; Hip fracture; Interview; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983738664     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: 15377385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181a9f1d6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ™ Instrument), Version 5.1. Buffalo, NY, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1997
2. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, et al. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation, in Fuhrer MJ (ed): Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Baltimore, MD, Paul H. Brookes, 1987, pp 137-47
3. Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The Functional Independence Measure, in MacDowell I, Newell C (eds): Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires, ed 2. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1996, pp 115-21
4. Granger CV, Hamilton BB: The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of first admission for 1991. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:33-8
5. Jensen MP, Abresch RT, Carter GT: The reliability and validity of a self-report version of the FIM instrument in persons with neuromuscular disease and chronic pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:116-22
6. Hershkovitz A, Kalandariov Z, Hermush V, et al: Factors affecting short-term rehabilitation outcomes of disabled elderly patients with proximal hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:916-21
7. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, et al: Functional assessment scales: A study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:870-5
8. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, et al: Performance profiles of the Functional Independence Measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:84-9
9. Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, et al: A validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:531-6
10. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, et al: The Functional Independence Measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987;1:6-18
11. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, et al: Functional assessment scales: A study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:133-8
12. Disler PB, Roy CW, Smith BP: Predicting hours of care needed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:139-43
13. Rockwood K, Stolee P, Fox RA: Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1113-8
14. Di Scala C, Grant CC, Brooke MM, et al: Functional outcome in children with traumatic brain injury: Agreement between clinical judgment and the Functional Independence Measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992;71:145-8
15. Pollak N, Rheault W, Stoecker JL: Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1056-61
16. Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, et al: The Functional Independence Measure: A comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil 1995;17:10-4
17. Masedo AI, Hanley M, Jensen MP, et al: Reliability and validity of a self-report FIM (FIM-SR) in persons with amputation or spinal cord injury and chronic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:167-76
18. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, et al: The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: A quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1226-32
19. Daving Y, Andrén E, Nordholm L, et al: Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:301-10
20. Smith PM, Illig SB, Fiedler RC, et al: Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessment using the Functional Independence Measure in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:431-5
21. Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, et al: The Functional Independence Measure: Tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101-8
22. Beloosesky Y, Grinblat J, Epelboym B, et al: Dementia does not significantly affect complications and functional gain in elderly patients operated on for intracapsular hip fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001;121:257-60
23. Heruti RJ, Lusky A, Barell V, et al: Cognitive status at admission: Does it affect the rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients with hip fracture? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:432-36
24. Goldstein FC, Strasser DC, Woodard JL, et al. Functional outcome of cognitively impaired hip fracture patients on a geriatric rehabilitation unit. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:35-42
25. Mortifee PR, Busser J, Anton HA: The performance of a limited set of items from the Functional Independence Measure for use in acute trauma care and rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:436-9
26. Weh L, Ramb JF: Functional Independence Measure as a predictor of expected rehabilitation outcome in patients with total endoprosthesis replacement and after apoplectic infarct. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1992;130:333-8