Using environmental DNA to detect an endangered crayfish Cambaroides japonicus in streams

Conservation Genetics Resources

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 231-234

  Ikeda, Kousuke ^a   Doi, Hideyuki ^b   Tanaka, Kazunori ^a   Kawai, Tadashi ^c   Negishi, Junjiro N ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HYOGO   (Japan)

^c Hokkaido Wakkanai Fisheries Experiment Station   (Japan)

Author keywords

Lotic system; Real time PCR; Species detection; Species specific primers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983504605     PISSN: 18777252     EISSN: 18777260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12686-016-0541-z     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA et al (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55(4):1–12. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
2. Deiner K, Walser J-C, Mächler E, Altermatt F (2015) Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA. Biol Conserv 183:53–63. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.018
3. Dejean T, Valentini A, Miquel C et al (2012) Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. J Appl Ecol 49:953–959. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02171.x
4. Doi H, Uchii K, Takahara T et al (2015) Use of droplet digital PCR for estimation of fish abundance and biomass in environmental DNA surveys. PLoS ONE 10:e0122763. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122763
5. Foote AD, Thomsen PF, Sveegaard S et al (2012) Investigating the potential use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for genetic monitoring of marine mammals. PLoS ONE 7:e41781. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041781
6. Goldberg CS, Pilliod DS, Arkle RS, Waits LP (2011) Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using Rocky Mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders. PLoS ONE 6:e22746. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022746
7. Kawai T, Nakata K, Hamano T (2002) Temporal changes of the density in two crayfish species, the native Cambaroides japonicus (De Haan) and the alien Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana), in natural habitats of Hokkaido, Japan. Freshw Crayfish 13:198–206
8. Lodge DM, Turner CR, Jerde CL et al (2012) Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA. Mol Ecol 21:2555–2558. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x
9. Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Takahara T et al (2012) Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA. Limnology 13:193–197
10. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
11. Schmidt BR, Kéry M, Ursenbacher S, Hyman OJ, Collins JP (2013) Site occupancy models in the analysis of environmental DNA presence/absence surveys: a case study of an emerging amphibian pathogen. Methods Ecol Evol 4:646–653. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12052
12. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Doi H (2013) Using environmental DNA to estimate the distribution of an invasive fish species in ponds. PLoS ONE 8:e56584. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056584
13. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL et al (2012a) Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Mol Ecol 21:2565–2573. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x
14. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL et al (2012b) Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. PLoS ONE 7:e41732. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041732
15. Tréguier A, Paillisson J-M, Dejean T et al (2014) Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in freshwater ponds. J Appl Ecol 51:871–879. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12262
16. Uchii K, Doi H, Minamoto T (2016) A novel environmental DNA approach to quantify the cryptic invasion of non-native genotypes. Mol Ecol Resour 16:415–422. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12460