Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1287-1304

  Yarali, Hakan ^a,b   Polat, Mehtap ^b   Mumusoglu, Sezcan ^a   Yarali, Irem ^b   Bozdag, Gurkan ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Anatolia Women's Health Center   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Assisted reproduction; Endometrial preparation; Frozen embryo replacement; Meta analysis; Thawed embryo transfer

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN; GONADOTROPIN; LETROZOLE; PROGESTERONE;

ENDOMETRIAL THICKNESS; ENDOMETRIUM; FROZEN EMBRYO REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LIVE BIRTH; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; CRYOPRESERVATION; DRUG EFFECTS; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; META ANALYSIS; NIDATION; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES;

CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GONADOTROPINS; HUMANS; LIVE BIRTH; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PROGESTERONE;

EID: 84983499055     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0787-0     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. D’Angelo A. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention strategies: cryopreservation of all embryos. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28(6):513–8. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1265679.
2. Taylor TH, Patrick JL, Gitlin SA, Michael Wilson J, Crain JL, Griffin DK. Outcomes of blastocysts biopsied and vitrified once versus those cryopreserved twice for euploid blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(1):59–64. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.001.
3. Bourgain C, Devroey P. The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9(6):515–22.
4. European IVFMC, European Society of Human R, European IVFMC, European Society of Human R, Embryology, Kupka MS, D’Hooghe T, Ferraretti AP, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):233–48. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev319.
5. Kupka MS, Ferraretti AP, de Mouzon J, Erb K, D’Hooghe T, Castilla JA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHREdagger. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(10):2099–113. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu175.
6. CDC. Assisted reproductive technology, National summary report. 2013.
7. Glujovsky D, Dominguez M, Fiszbajn G, Papier S, Lavolpe M, Sueldo C. A shared egg donor program: which is the minimum number of oocytes to be allocated? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(3):263–7. doi:10.1007/s10815-010-9511-7.
8. Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AE, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(5):458–70. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt030.
9. Andersen AG, Als-Nielsen B, Hornnes PJ, Franch AL. Time interval from human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) injection to follicular rupture. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(12):3202–5.
10. Park SJ, Goldsmith LT, Skurnick JH, Wojtczuk A, Weiss G. Characteristics of the urinary luteinizing hormone surge in young ovulatory women. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):684–90. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.045.
11. Bjuresten K, Landgren BM, Hovatta O, Stavreus-Evers A. Luteal phase progesterone increases live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):534–7. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.019.
12. Fauser BC, de Jong D, Olivennes F, Wramsby H, Tay C, Itskovitz-Eldor J, et al. Endocrine profiles after triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist after cotreatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix during ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(2):709–15. doi:10.1210/jcem.87.2.8197.
13. Casper RF, Yanushpolsky EH. Optimal endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer cycles: window of implantation and progesterone support. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):867–72. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.006.
14. Eftekhar M, Rahsepar M, Rahmani E. Effect of progesterone supplementation on natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Fertil Steril. 2013;7(1):13–20.
15. Dal Prato L, Borini A, Cattoli M, Bonu MA, Sciajno R, Flamigni C. Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer with or without pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(5):956–60.
16. van de Vijver A, Polyzos NP, Van Landuyt L, De Vos M, Camus M, Stoop D, et al. Cryopreserved embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: is GnRH agonist down-regulation necessary? Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(5):588–94. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.005.
17. Van der Auwera I, Meuleman C, Koninckx PR. Human menopausal gonadotrophin increases pregnancy rate in comparison with clomiphene citrate during replacement cycles of frozen/thawed pronucleate ova. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(8):1556–60.
18. Peeraer K, Couck I, Debrock S, De Neubourg D, De Loecker P, Tomassetti C, et al. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a natural or mildly hormonally stimulated cycle in women with regular ovulatory cycles: a RCT. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(11):2552–62. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev224.
19. Ezoe K, Daikoku T, Yabuuchi A, Murata N, Kawano H, Abe T, et al. Ovarian stimulation using human chorionic gonadotrophin impairs blastocyst implantation and decidualization by altering ovarian hormone levels and downstream signaling in mice. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20(11):1101–16. doi:10.1093/molehr/gau065.
20. Horcajadas JA, Minguez P, Dopazo J, Esteban FJ, Dominguez F, Giudice LC, et al. Controlled ovarian stimulation induces a functional genomic delay of the endometrium with potential clinical implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(11):4500–10. doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0588.
21. Glujovsky D, Pesce R, Fiszbajn G, Sueldo C, Hart RJ, Ciapponi A. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD006359. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006359.pub2.
22. El Bahja D. Frozen embryo transfer protocol: does spontaneous cycle give good results? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012.
23. Yishia D. Do we need to artificially prepare the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer in normal cycling women? A controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:112.
24. Belaisch-Allart J. Clinical management of a frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycle. Abstracts of the 10th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE Brussels. 1994:138-9.
25. Gonzales J. Natural cycle and hormonal replacement in FET: implantation and pregnancy rates. Abstract Book of the 48th Meeting of the American Fertility Society. 1992:42.
26. Cattoli M. Arandomized prospective studyon cryopreserved-thawedembryo transfer: natural versus homrone replacement cycles. Abstracts of the 10th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE Brussels. 1994;356:139.
27. Alama P. Higher ongoing pregnancy rates in blastocyst transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in natural cycles than in hormone replacement therapy cycles. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:161.
28. Dolan P. Natural cycles and estrogen/progestone induced cycles produce an equallly receptive endometrium for implantation of cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) 1991:16.
29. Lee S. Comparison of clinical outcome of frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles between natural and artificial (hormone-treated) cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:217.
30. Spandorfer S. Blastocyst frozen embryo transfer (FET): comparison of outcome with replacement in natural or programmed/medicated cycle. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:154.
31. Azimi Nekoo E, Chamani M, Shahrokh Tehrani E, Hossein Rashidi B, Davari Tanha F, Kalantari V. Artificial endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer with or without pretreatment with depot gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist in women with regular menses. J Fam Reprod Health. 2015;9(1):1–4.
32. Kawamura T, Motoyama H, Yanaihara A, Yoramitsu TAA, Karasawa K, et al. Clinical outcomes of two different endometrial preparation methods for cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in patients with a normal menstrual cycle. Reprod Med Biol. 2007;6(1):53–7.
33. Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2054–8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036.
34. Weissman A, Horowitz E, Ravhon A, Steinfeld Z, Mutzafi R, Golan A, et al. Spontaneous ovulation versus HCG triggering for timing natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(4):484–9. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.004.
35. Chang EM, Han JE, Kim YS, Lyu SW, Lee WS, Yoon TK. Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes: cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(4):369–74. doi:10.1007/s10815-010-9530-4.
36. Tomas C, Alsbjerg B, Martikainen H, Humaidan P. Pregnancy loss after frozen-embryo transfer—a comparison of three protocols. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1165–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1058.
37. Weissman A, Levin D, Ravhon A, Eran H, Golan A, Levran D. What is the preferred method for timing natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer? Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(1):66–71.
38. Levron J, Yerushalmi GM, Brengauz M, Gat I, Katorza E. Comparison between two protocols for thawed embryo transfer: natural cycle versus exogenous hormone replacement. Gynecol Endocrinol: Off J Int Soc Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(7):494–7. doi:10.3109/09513590.2014.900032.
39. Loh SK, Leong NK. Factors affecting success in an embryo cryopreservation programme. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1999;28(2):260–5.
40. Morozov V, Ruman J, Kenigsberg D, Moodie G, Brenner S. Natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer may improve pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24(4):119–23. doi:10.1007/s10815-006-9100-y.
41. Orvieto R, Feldman N, Lantsberg D, Manela D, Zilberberg E, Haas J. Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer—can we improve cycle outcome? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(5):611–5. doi:10.1007/s10815-016-0685-5.
42. Veleva Z, Orava M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2425–31. doi:10.1093/humrep/det251.
43. Xiao Z, Zhou X, Xu W, Yang J, Xie Q. Natural cycle is superior to hormone replacement therapy cycle for vitrificated-preserved frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2012;58(2):107–12. doi:10.3109/19396368.2011.646047.
44. Mounce G, McVeigh E, Turner K, Child TJ. Randomized, controlled pilot trial of natural versus hormone replacement therapy cycles in frozen embryo replacement in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):915–20. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1131. e1.
45. Tanos V, Friedler S, Zajicek G, Neiger M, Lewin A, Schenker JG. The impact of endometrial preparation on implantation following cryopreserved-thawed-embryo transfer. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1996;41(4):227–31.
46. al-Shawaf T, Dave R, Harper J, Linehan D, Riley P, Craft I. Transfer of embryos into the uterus: how much do technical factors affect pregnancy rates? J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993;10(1):31–6.
47. Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Hunter HR, Fitzgerald CT, Horne G, Pease EE, et al. Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):603–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.015.
48. Hill MJ, Miller KA, Frattarelli JL. A GnRH agonist and exogenous hormone stimulation protocol has a higher live-birth rate than a natural endogenous hormone protocol for frozen-thawed blastocyst-stage embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of 1391 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):416–22. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.027.
49. Queenan Jr JT, Veeck LL, Seltman HJ, Muasher SJ. Transfer of cryopreserved-thawed pre-embryos in a natural cycle or a programmed cycle with exogenous hormonal replacement yields similar pregnancy results. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(3):545–50.
50. Groenewoud ER, Cohlen BJ, Al-Oraiby A, Brinkhuis EA, Broekmans FJ, de Bruin JP, et al. A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2016. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew120.
51. Givens CR, Markun LC, Ryan IP, Chenette PE, Herbert CM, Schriock ED. Outcomes of natural cycles versus programmed cycles for 1677 frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(3):380–4.
52. Hancke K, More S, Kreienberg R, Weiss JM. Patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer have similar live birth rates in spontaneous and artificial cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(5):403–7. doi:10.1007/s10815-012-9724-z.
53. Konc J, Kanyo K, Varga E, Kriston R, Cseh S. The effect of cycle regimen used for endometrium preparation on the outcome of day 3 frozen embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):767–8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.053.
54. Lathi RB, Chi YY, Liu J, Saravanabavanandhan B, Hegde A, Baker VL. Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer using a supplemented natural cycle protocol has a similar live birth rate compared to a programmed cycle protocol. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(7):1057–62. doi:10.1007/s10815-015-0499-x.
55. El-Toukhy T, Taylor A, Khalaf Y, Al-Darazi K, Rowell P, Seed P, et al. Pituitary suppression in ultrasound-monitored frozen embryo replacement cycles. A randomised study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(4):874–9. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh183.
56. Nekoo EA, Chamani M, Tehrani ES, Rashidi BH, Tanha FD, Kalantari V. Artificial endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer with or without pretreatment with depot gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist in women with regular menses. J Fam Reprod Health. 2014;9(1):1–4.
57. Simon A, Hurwitz A, Zentner BS, Bdolah Y, Laufer N. Transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in artificially prepared cycles with and without prior gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist suppression: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(1O):2712–7.
58. Dor J, Rudak E, Davidson A, Levran D, Ben-Rafael Z, Mashiach S. Endocrine and biological factors influencing implantation of human embryos following cryopreservation. Gynecol Endocrinol: Off J Int Soc Gynecol Endocrinol. 1991;5(3):203–11.
59. Imthurn B, Macas E, Rosselli M, Keller PJ. Effect of a programmed short-term stimulation protocol on the replacement of cryopreserved embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13(9):709–12.
60. Li SJ, Zhang YJ, Chai XS, Nie MF, Zhou YY, Chen JL, et al. Letrozole ovulation induction: an effective option in endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(3):687–93. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-3044-0.
61. Yu J, Ma Y, Wu Z, Li Y, Tang L, Li Y, et al. Endometrial preparation protocol of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(1):201–11. doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3396-0.
62. Griesinger G, Weig M, Schroer A, Diedrich K, Kolibianakis EM. Mid-cycle serum levels of endogenous LH are not associated with the likelihood of pregnancy in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles without pituitary suppression. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2589–93. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem207.
63. Groenewoud ER, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ. Spontaneous LH surges prior to HCG administration in unstimulated-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer do not influence pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(2):191–6. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.11.003.
64. Brosens J, Verhoeven H, Campo R, Gianaroli L, Gordts S, Hazekamp J, et al. High endometrial aromatase P450 mRNA expression is associated with poor IVF outcome. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(2):352–6.
65. Madero S, Rodriguez A, Vassena R, Vernaeve V. Endometrial preparation: effect of estrogen dose and administration route on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles with fresh embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2016. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew099.
66. Remohi J, Vidal A, Pellicer A. Oocyte donation in low responders to conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(6):1208–15.
67. van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD009154. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009154.pub3.
68. Haddad G, Saguan DA, Maxwell R, Thomas MA. Intramuscular route of progesterone administration increases pregnancy rates during non-downregulated frozen embryo transfer cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24(10):467–70. doi:10.1007/s10815-007-9168-z.
69. Kaser DJ, Ginsburg ES, Missmer SA, Correia KF, Racowsky C. Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support for day 3 cryopreserved embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1464–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.007.
70. Wang Y, He Y, Zhao X, Ji X, Hong Y, Wang Y, et al. Crinone gel for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomized clinical trial in the Chinese population. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133027. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133027.
71. Shapiro DB, Pappadakis JA, Ellsworth NM, Hait HI, Nagy ZP. Progesterone replacement with vaginal gel versus i.m. injection: cycle and pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients receiving vitrified blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(8):1706–11. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu121.
72. Leonard PH, Hokenstad AN, Khan Z, Jensen JR, Stewart EA, Coddington CC. Progesterone support for frozen embryo transfer: intramuscular versus vaginal suppository demonstrates no difference in a cohort. J Reprod Med. 2015;60(3-4):103–8.
73. El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Khairy M, Sunkara K, Seed P, Khalaf Y, et al. The relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of medicated frozen embryo replacement cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):832–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.031.
74. Gingold JA, Lee JA, Rodriguez-Purata J, Whitehouse MC, Sandler B, Grunfeld L, et al. Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):620–8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.036. e5.
75. Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, et al. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(9):1976–82. doi:10.1093/humrep/den222.
76. Cercas R, Villas C, Pons I, Brana C, Fernandez-Shaw S. Vitrification can modify embryo cleavage stage after warming. Should we change endometrial preparation? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(12):1363–8. doi:10.1007/s10815-012-9881-0.