Satisfaction assessment with malleable prosthetic implant of Spectra (AMS) and Genesis (Coloplast) models

International Journal of Impotence Research

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 228-233

  Casabe A R ^a,b   Sarotto, N ^a   Gutierrez, C ^a   Bechara, A J ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL DURAND   (Argentina)

^b IME   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANORGASMIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE COMPARISON; EJACULATION DISORDER; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION INVENTORY OF TREATMENT SATISFACTION; EXPECTATION; FOLLOW UP; GENITAL SYSTEM DISEASE ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALLEABLE PENIS PROSTHESIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM SURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PENIS PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PENILE PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MALE;

EID: 84983470430     PISSN: 09559930     EISSN: 14765489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2016.33     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Montorsi F, Adaikan G, Becher E, Giuliano F, Khoury S, Lue TF et al. Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 3572-3588.
2. Vitarelli A, Divenuto L, Fortunato F, Falco A, Pagliarulo V, Antonini G et al. Long term patient satisfaction and quality of life with AMS700CX inflatable penile prosthesis. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2013; 85: 133-137.
3. Rajpurkar A, Dhabuwala CB. Comparison of satisfaction rates and erectile function in patients treated with Sildenafil, intracavernous prostaglandin E1 and penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction in urology practice. J Urol 2003; 170: 159-163.
4. Martinez DR, Terlecki R, Brant W. The evolution and utility of the Small-Carrion prosthesis, its impact, and progression to the modern-day malleable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med 2015; 12(Suppl 7): 423-430.
5. Bertero EB, Antunes D. Surgical treatment of erectile dysfunction. Sex Med Rev 2015; 3: 316-327.
6. Habous M. Malleable (semi-rigid) penile prosthesis. Surgical techniques. J Sex Med 2015; 12: 1984-1988.
7. Wilson SK, Cleves M, Delk JR 2nd. Long term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multicomponent inflatables. J Urol 1996; 5: 1621-1623.
8. Bernal RM, Henry GD. Contemporary patient satisfaction rates for three-piece inflatable penile prostheses. Adv Urol 2012; 2012: 1-5.
9. Althof SE, Corty EW, Levine SB, Levine F, Burnett AL. EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction. Urology 1999; 53: 793-799.
10. Levine L, Estrada C, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability and safety of and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol 2001; 166: 932-937.
11. Trost LW, Baum N, Hellstrom WJ. Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient. J Sex Med 2013; 10: 893-906.
12. Carvalheira A, Santana R, Pereira N. Why are men satisfied or dissatisfied with penile implants? A mixed method study on satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med 2015; 12: 2474-2480.
13. Natali A, Olianas R, Fisch M. Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 1503-1512.
14. Salama N. Satisfaction with the malleable penile prosthesis among couples from the Middle East: is it different from that reported elsewhere? Int J Impot Res 2004; 16: 175-180.
15. Falcone M, Rolle L, Ceruti C, Timpano M, Sedigh O, Preto M et al. Prospective analysis of the surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction rate after the AMS Spectra penile prosthesis implantation. Urology 2013; 82: 373-376.
16. Al Ansari A, Talib R, Canguven O, Shamsodini A. Axial penile rigidity influences patient and partner satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2013; 85: 138-142.
17. Mulhall JP, Ahmed A, Branch J, Parker M. Serial assessment of efficacy and satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol 2003; 169: 1429-1433.
18. Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd. A new treatment for Peyronie's disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1994; 152: 1121-1123.