Long-term results with hydroflex and dynaflex penile prostheses: Device survival comparison to multicomponent inflatables

Journal of Urology

Volumn 155, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 1621-1623

  Wilson, Steven K ^a   Cleves, Mario ^a   Delk II, John R ^a  

^a Southwest Impotency Center   (United States)

Author keywords

impotence; penile erection; penile prosthesis; penis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPOTENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PENIS PROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 0029991492     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66145-7     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Mulcahy, J. J.: The Hydroflex penile prosthesis. Urol. Clin. N. Amer., 16: 33, 1989.
2. Fishman, I. J.: Experience with the Hydroflex penile prosthesis. Sem. Urol., 4: 239, 1986.
3. Kabalin, J. N. and Kessler, R.: Experience with the Hydroflex penile prosthesis. J. Urol., 141: 58, 1989.
4. Mulcahy, J. J.: The Hydroflex self-contained inflatable prosthesis: experience with 100 patients. J. Urol., 140: 1422, 1988.
5. Riehmann, M., Gasser, T. C. and Bruskewitz, R. C.: The Hydroflex penile prosthesis: a test case for the introduction of new urological technology. J. Urol., 149: 1304, 1993.
6. Wilson, S. K. and Delk, J. R., II: Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J. Urol., 153: 659, 1995.